github-starred/gitea
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea.git synced 2026-03-10 13:56:06 -05:00
Code Issues 2.6k Packages Projects Releases 100 Wiki Activity

Add number of repos for every filter type #967

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-11-02 03:43:35 -06:00 by GiteaMirror · 13 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 03:43:35 -06:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @Morlinest on GitHub (Aug 16, 2017).

Hi, what do you think about little improvement of UI (introduced in #2285):
image

or with grey color

image

Any comment or idea is welcome.

Originally created by @Morlinest on GitHub (Aug 16, 2017). Hi, what do you think about little improvement of UI (introduced in #2285): ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12720041/29363140-15610f5c-828f-11e7-86be-85f1c870c5f2.png) or with grey color ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12720041/29363196-54242e0e-828f-11e7-9c9b-1954cbfa3abc.png) Any comment or idea is welcome.
GiteaMirror added the type/proposaltype/enhancement labels 2025-11-02 03:43:35 -06:00
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 03:43:36 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@lafriks commented on GitHub (Aug 16, 2017):

Grey looks better. Also I think numbers should be lower like it is in my repositories count above.

@lafriks commented on GitHub (Aug 16, 2017): Grey looks better. Also I think numbers should be lower like it is in my repositories count above.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 03:43:36 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Morlinest commented on GitHub (Aug 16, 2017):

@lafriks Like this? Doesn't fit to screen well.

image

@Morlinest commented on GitHub (Aug 16, 2017): @lafriks Like this? Doesn't fit to screen well. ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12720041/29382684-aea7fdfe-82cd-11e7-9a9b-ba66f8ffc5d9.png)
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 03:43:36 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Morlinest commented on GitHub (Aug 16, 2017):

I was looking at github dashboard. They have filters too, but each filter do own search. Our filter only filters result of search "all" repositories. I can rework rest api and add type to query options.

@Morlinest commented on GitHub (Aug 16, 2017): I was looking at github dashboard. They have filters too, but each filter do own search. Our filter only filters result of search "all" repositories. I can rework rest api and add type to query options.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 03:43:37 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@daviian commented on GitHub (Aug 16, 2017):

In my opinion numbers are too much. Why not just greyish the filter which does not have any results, don't disable the button, only greyish to give a visual hint?

@daviian commented on GitHub (Aug 16, 2017): In my opinion numbers are too much. Why not just greyish the filter which does not have any results, don't disable the button, only greyish to give a visual hint?
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 03:43:37 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@lafriks commented on GitHub (Aug 16, 2017):

I also does not like how it looks... Numbers makes interface with too much information. I agree that filters on each tab does need to perform it's own query as otherwise if you could get wrong information about your repositories if you are hitting page size limit

@lafriks commented on GitHub (Aug 16, 2017): I also does not like how it looks... Numbers makes interface with too much information. I agree that filters on each tab does need to perform it's own query as otherwise if you could get wrong information about your repositories if you are hitting page size limit
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 03:43:37 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Morlinest commented on GitHub (Aug 17, 2017):

@daviian @lafriks I agree with you both. I'll try to change search of repositories first, each filter should do own search. Also I have some idea how to make it effective (and after testing on github I found that they had same idea :D)

Edit: Not exactly the same idea (also some bugs there).

@Morlinest commented on GitHub (Aug 17, 2017): @daviian @lafriks I agree with you both. I'll try to change search of repositories first, each filter should do own search. Also I have some idea how to make it effective (and after testing on github I found that they had same idea :D) Edit: Not exactly the same idea (also some bugs there).
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 03:43:37 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Morlinest commented on GitHub (Aug 18, 2017):

I have some updates. First, with #2326 it's possible to do search for each filter, it can looks like this:

  1. Without "counter" (same as now, but with custom search)
    2017-08-18_13-29-12

  2. Without "counter", with additional loader
    2017-08-18_13-26-39

  3. Can be same as 2 or 3, but with count of repositories for actual filter and searchQuery
    image
    image
    image

"Show more repositories" text is shown when actual search hits limit.

What do you think guys?

@Morlinest commented on GitHub (Aug 18, 2017): I have some updates. First, with #2326 it's possible to do search for each filter, it can looks like this: 1. Without "counter" (same as now, but with custom search) ![2017-08-18_13-29-12](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12720041/29458187-2bff496e-841e-11e7-87d9-fa3f4cc3957a.gif) 2. Without "counter", with additional loader ![2017-08-18_13-26-39](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12720041/29458186-2bfe0644-841e-11e7-9dd7-a64c559b5557.gif) 3. Can be same as 2 or 3, but with `count` of repositories for actual filter and `searchQuery` ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12720041/29458385-1f5a68aa-841f-11e7-885e-67e8a6f10fa3.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12720041/29458395-2c621ad4-841f-11e7-9d33-4f3b06f15675.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12720041/29458522-e501c3c8-841f-11e7-93e4-f3d417237492.png) "Show more repositories" text is shown when actual search hits `limit`. What do you think guys?
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 03:43:37 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@lafriks commented on GitHub (Aug 18, 2017):

that looks good 👍

@lafriks commented on GitHub (Aug 18, 2017): that looks good :+1:
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 03:43:38 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Morlinest commented on GitHub (Aug 18, 2017):

@lafriks Which one looks best?

  1. With or without additional loader?
  2. With or without number of repositories?
@Morlinest commented on GitHub (Aug 18, 2017): @lafriks Which one looks best? 1. With or without additional loader? 2. With or without number of repositories?
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 03:43:38 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@lafriks commented on GitHub (Aug 18, 2017):

@Morlinest with loader & with total repository count

@lafriks commented on GitHub (Aug 18, 2017): @Morlinest with loader & with total repository count
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 03:43:38 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@daviian commented on GitHub (Aug 20, 2017):

@Morlinest One small approvement would be to show a little spinner (or something else) while searching instead of a zero count ;-)

@daviian commented on GitHub (Aug 20, 2017): @Morlinest One small approvement would be to show a little spinner (or something else) while searching instead of a zero count ;-)
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 03:43:38 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@lafriks commented on GitHub (Aug 20, 2017):

No more spinners, two are already enough :) Just show count label only when data is loaded

@lafriks commented on GitHub (Aug 20, 2017): No more spinners, two are already enough :) Just show count label only when data is loaded
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 03:43:38 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Morlinest commented on GitHub (Nov 4, 2017):

Closed by #2343

@Morlinest commented on GitHub (Nov 4, 2017): Closed by #2343
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
$20
$250
$50
$500
backport/done
💎 Bounty
docs-update-needed
good first issue
hacktoberfest
issue/bounty
issue/confirmed
issue/critical
issue/duplicate
issue/needs-feedback
issue/not-a-bug
issue/regression
issue/stale
issue/workaround
lgtm/need 2
modifies/api
modifies/translation
outdated/backport/v1.18
outdated/theme/markdown
outdated/theme/timetracker
performance/bigrepo
performance/cpu
performance/memory
performance/speed
pr/breaking
proposal/accepted
proposal/rejected
pr/wip
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 reviewed/wontfix
💰 Rewarded
skip-changelog
status/blocked
topic/accessibility
topic/api
topic/authentication
topic/build
topic/code-linting
topic/commit-signing
topic/content-rendering
topic/deployment
topic/distribution
topic/federation
topic/gitea-actions
topic/issues
topic/lfs
topic/mobile
topic/moderation
topic/packages
topic/pr
topic/projects
topic/repo
topic/repo-migration
topic/security
topic/theme
topic/ui
topic/ui-interaction
topic/ux
topic/webhooks
topic/wiki
type/bug
type/deprecation
type/docs
type/enhancement
type/feature
type/miscellaneous
type/proposal
type/question
type/refactoring
type/summary
type/testing
type/upstream
No Label type/enhancement type/proposal
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/gitea#967
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?