mirror of
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea.git
synced 2026-03-12 10:39:38 -05:00
Display a License tab #84
Closed
opened 2025-11-02 03:08:01 -06:00 by GiteaMirror
·
21 comments
No Branch/Tag Specified
main
release/v1.25
release/v1.24
release/v1.23
release/v1.22
release/v1.21
release/v1.20
release/v1.19
release/v1.18
release/v1.17
release/v1.16
release/v1.15
release/v1.14
release/v1.13
release/v1.12
release/v1.11
release/v1.10
release/v1.9
release/v1.8
v1.25.3
v1.25.2
v1.25.1
v1.25.0
v1.24.7
v1.25.0-rc0
v1.26.0-dev
v1.24.6
v1.24.5
v1.24.4
v1.24.3
v1.24.2
v1.24.1
v1.24.0
v1.23.8
v1.24.0-rc0
v1.25.0-dev
v1.23.7
v1.23.6
v1.23.5
v1.23.4
v1.23.3
v1.23.2
v1.23.1
v1.23.0
v1.23.0-rc0
v1.24.0-dev
v1.22.6
v1.22.5
v1.22.4
v1.22.3
v1.22.2
v1.22.1
v1.22.0
v1.23.0-dev
v1.22.0-rc1
v1.21.11
v1.22.0-rc0
v1.21.10
v1.21.9
v1.21.8
v1.21.7
v1.21.6
v1.21.5
v1.21.4
v1.21.3
v1.21.2
v1.20.6
v1.21.1
v1.21.0
v1.21.0-rc2
v1.21.0-rc1
v1.20.5
v1.22.0-dev
v1.21.0-rc0
v1.20.4
v1.20.3
v1.20.2
v1.20.1
v1.20.0
v1.19.4
v1.21.0-dev
v1.20.0-rc2
v1.20.0-rc1
v1.20.0-rc0
v1.19.3
v1.19.2
v1.19.1
v1.19.0
v1.19.0-rc1
v1.20.0-dev
v1.19.0-rc0
v1.18.5
v1.18.4
v1.18.3
v1.18.2
v1.18.1
v1.18.0
v1.17.4
v1.18.0-rc1
v1.19.0-dev
v1.18.0-rc0
v1.17.3
v1.17.2
v1.17.1
v1.17.0
v1.17.0-rc2
v1.16.9
v1.17.0-rc1
v1.18.0-dev
v1.16.8
v1.16.7
v1.16.6
v1.16.5
v1.16.4
v1.16.3
v1.16.2
v1.16.1
v1.16.0
v1.15.11
v1.17.0-dev
v1.16.0-rc1
v1.15.10
v1.15.9
v1.15.8
v1.15.7
v1.15.6
v1.15.5
v1.15.4
v1.15.3
v1.15.2
v1.15.1
v1.14.7
v1.15.0
v1.15.0-rc3
v1.14.6
v1.15.0-rc2
v1.14.5
v1.16.0-dev
v1.15.0-rc1
v1.14.4
v1.14.3
v1.14.2
v1.14.1
v1.14.0
v1.13.7
v1.14.0-rc2
v1.13.6
v1.13.5
v1.14.0-rc1
v1.15.0-dev
v1.13.4
v1.13.3
v1.13.2
v1.13.1
v1.13.0
v1.12.6
v1.13.0-rc2
v1.14.0-dev
v1.13.0-rc1
v1.12.5
v1.12.4
v1.12.3
v1.12.2
v1.12.1
v1.11.8
v1.12.0
v1.11.7
v1.12.0-rc2
v1.11.6
v1.12.0-rc1
v1.13.0-dev
v1.11.5
v1.11.4
v1.11.3
v1.10.6
v1.12.0-dev
v1.11.2
v1.10.5
v1.11.1
v1.10.4
v1.11.0
v1.11.0-rc2
v1.10.3
v1.11.0-rc1
v1.10.2
v1.10.1
v1.10.0
v1.9.6
v1.9.5
v1.10.0-rc2
v1.11.0-dev
v1.10.0-rc1
v1.9.4
v1.9.3
v1.9.2
v1.9.1
v1.9.0
v1.9.0-rc2
v1.10.0-dev
v1.9.0-rc1
v1.8.3
v1.8.2
v1.8.1
v1.8.0
v1.8.0-rc3
v1.7.6
v1.8.0-rc2
v1.7.5
v1.8.0-rc1
v1.9.0-dev
v1.7.4
v1.7.3
v1.7.2
v1.7.1
v1.7.0
v1.7.0-rc3
v1.6.4
v1.7.0-rc2
v1.6.3
v1.7.0-rc1
v1.7.0-dev
v1.6.2
v1.6.1
v1.6.0
v1.6.0-rc2
v1.5.3
v1.6.0-rc1
v1.6.0-dev
v1.5.2
v1.5.1
v1.5.0
v1.5.0-rc2
v1.5.0-rc1
v1.5.0-dev
v1.4.3
v1.4.2
v1.4.1
v1.4.0
v1.4.0-rc3
v1.4.0-rc2
v1.3.3
v1.4.0-rc1
v1.3.2
v1.3.1
v1.3.0
v1.3.0-rc2
v1.3.0-rc1
v1.2.3
v1.2.2
v1.2.1
v1.2.0
v1.2.0-rc3
v1.2.0-rc2
v1.1.4
v1.2.0-rc1
v1.1.3
v1.1.2
v1.1.1
v1.1.0
v1.0.2
v1.0.1
v1.0.0
v0.9.99
Labels
Clear labels
$20
$250
$50
$500
backport/done
💎 Bounty
docs-update-needed
good first issue
hacktoberfest
issue/bounty
issue/confirmed
issue/critical
issue/duplicate
issue/needs-feedback
issue/not-a-bug
issue/regression
issue/stale
issue/workaround
lgtm/need 2
modifies/api
modifies/translation
outdated/backport/v1.18
outdated/theme/markdown
outdated/theme/timetracker
performance/bigrepo
performance/cpu
performance/memory
performance/speed
pr/breaking
proposal/accepted
proposal/rejected
pr/wip
pull-request
reviewed/wontfix
💰 Rewarded
skip-changelog
status/blocked
topic/accessibility
topic/api
topic/authentication
topic/build
topic/code-linting
topic/commit-signing
topic/content-rendering
topic/deployment
topic/distribution
topic/federation
topic/gitea-actions
topic/issues
topic/lfs
topic/mobile
topic/moderation
topic/packages
topic/pr
topic/projects
topic/repo
topic/repo-migration
topic/security
topic/theme
topic/ui
topic/ui-interaction
topic/ux
topic/webhooks
topic/wiki
type/bug
type/deprecation
type/docs
type/enhancement
type/feature
type/miscellaneous
type/proposal
type/question
type/refactoring
type/summary
type/testing
type/upstream
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
No Assignees
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: github-starred/gitea#84
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @give-me-my-toblerone on GitHub (Nov 27, 2016).
Like GitHub does. It shows a tab with the project license, so it's immediate to see what it is
@tboerger commented on GitHub (Nov 27, 2016):
I don't understand what you want to request, please explain it properly.
@thibaultmeyer commented on GitHub (Nov 27, 2016):
Maybe he speak about this?
@tboerger commented on GitHub (Nov 27, 2016):
Ah, that makes more sense.
@lunny commented on GitHub (Nov 27, 2016):
But for a self-hosted server, I seems there is no requirement.
@thibaultmeyer commented on GitHub (Nov 27, 2016):
we are no forced to do something like github who scan repo to determine license. maybe just a selectbox field on repo settings page is enough ?
@tboerger commented on GitHub (Nov 27, 2016):
This is something we can integrate at some point, so I moved it to a future milestone
@bkcsoft commented on GitHub (Nov 28, 2016):
Using something like go-license[1] it'd be fairly simple to implement, just remember to cache the result until the license-file changes (just add another column in the repo-table)
[1] https://github.com/ryanuber/go-license
@thibaultmeyer commented on GitHub (Nov 28, 2016):
yes we could add a new field on repo model and update it at each push / merge event.
@bkcsoft commented on GitHub (Nov 29, 2016):
@0xbaadf00d preferably only update when
LICENSE*have been updated ;)@bamboleeeero-bamboleeeero commented on GitHub (Nov 29, 2016):
@bkcsoft that may not be always he case... some projects use COPYING for instance
@bamboleeeero-bamboleeeero commented on GitHub (Nov 29, 2016):
LICENSE files my also not necessarily contain a single license, but a list of licenses for various components
@bkcsoft commented on GitHub (Dec 2, 2016):
@bamboleeeero-bamboleeeero
How does GitHub handle this?
Same here. How does others handle that?
As I see it, it's a new feature, do the smallest amount of work first then extend on that in a later version :)
@nogweii commented on GitHub (Jan 6, 2017):
Github handles this through the gem licensee.
Github scans the root of a project, and matches the files in that directory against a series of regular expressions with scores. High enough and it's treated as a file that likely contains the license text.
The first license that Licensee detects and knows about is used. A better solution is being discussed at https://github.com/benbalter/licensee/issues/57
@gsantner commented on GitHub (Dec 16, 2017):
I can agree to @bamboleeeero-bamboleeeero - the filename is not always LICENSE. E.g. LICENSE.txt, LICENSE.md, COPYING are often used too
@stale[bot] commented on GitHub (Feb 10, 2019):
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs during the next 2 weeks. Thank you for your contributions.
@lunny commented on GitHub (Mar 17, 2020):
ref. https://github.com/src-d/go-license-detector
@hendrikbl commented on GitHub (Jul 20, 2020):
@lunny Any plans to implement this? The library looks promising.
@lafriks commented on GitHub (Jul 20, 2020):
Library moved to https://github.com/go-enry/go-license-detector
@mxmehl commented on GitHub (May 21, 2021):
May I suggest to also support the more flexible REUSE standard when implementing this important feature?
License detection would become really easy, especially if multiple licenses are in use. All you have to do is fetching the file names from the
LICENSESdirectory. For instance, check this.The files names (without
.txt) indicate the unique SPDX license identifiers, and save everyone from interpreting the often diverging text in files likeLICENSEorCOPYING.@6543 commented on GitHub (Sep 25, 2021):
google did start developing a licence detector: https://github.com/google/licensecheck
@quackerd commented on GitHub (Dec 2, 2022):
Would be very helpful indeed to have a license tab