github-starred/gitea
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea.git synced 2026-04-24 02:26:09 -05:00
Code Issues 2.6k Packages Projects Releases 100 Wiki Activity

[Feature] Authentication Sources - OAuth2 - Add JWT and PKCE Support #7816

New Issue
Open
opened 2025-11-02 07:37:41 -06:00 by GiteaMirror · 4 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 07:37:41 -06:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @ghost on GitHub (Sep 7, 2021).

Currently authentication sources for OAuth2 only support shared secrets (implicit flow), which is not recommended for security reasons. Recommend implementation of Private Key JWT and/or PKCE for OAuth2 authentication sources.

Originally created by @ghost on GitHub (Sep 7, 2021). Currently authentication sources for OAuth2 only support shared secrets (implicit flow), which is [not recommended for security reasons](https://oauth.net/2/grant-types/implicit/). Recommend implementation of Private Key JWT and/or [PKCE](https://developer.okta.com/blog/2019/08/22/okta-authjs-pkce) for OAuth2 authentication sources.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 07:37:42 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@zeripath commented on GitHub (Sep 7, 2021):

This already exists.

@zeripath commented on GitHub (Sep 7, 2021): This already exists.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 07:37:43 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@ghost commented on GitHub (Sep 7, 2021):

Does it? As far as I can see the latest release only supports client/server secrets for OAuth, which is implicit flow. You're probably thinking of OAuth providers (not sources), which Gitea does support Private Key JWT and PKCE for that.

@ghost commented on GitHub (Sep 7, 2021): Does it? As far as I can see the latest release only supports client/server secrets for OAuth, which is implicit flow. You're probably thinking of OAuth providers (not sources), which Gitea does support Private Key JWT and PKCE for that.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 07:37:43 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@techknowlogick commented on GitHub (Sep 7, 2021):

I've re-opened this, but it may require some changes in https://github.com/markbates/goth upstream before we can support it.

@techknowlogick commented on GitHub (Sep 7, 2021): I've re-opened this, but it may require some changes in https://github.com/markbates/goth upstream before we can support it.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 07:37:43 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@NexZhu commented on GitHub (May 23, 2024):

@techknowlogick Is this supported now?

@NexZhu commented on GitHub (May 23, 2024): @techknowlogick Is this supported now?
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
$20
$250
$50
$500
backport/done
💎 Bounty
docs-update-needed
good first issue
hacktoberfest
issue/bounty
issue/confirmed
issue/critical
issue/duplicate
issue/needs-feedback
issue/not-a-bug
issue/regression
issue/stale
issue/workaround
lgtm/need 2
modifies/api
modifies/translation
outdated/backport/v1.18
outdated/theme/markdown
outdated/theme/timetracker
performance/bigrepo
performance/cpu
performance/memory
performance/speed
pr/breaking
proposal/accepted
proposal/rejected
pr/wip
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 reviewed/wontfix
💰 Rewarded
skip-changelog
status/blocked
topic/accessibility
topic/api
topic/authentication
topic/build
topic/code-linting
topic/commit-signing
topic/content-rendering
topic/deployment
topic/distribution
topic/federation
topic/gitea-actions
topic/issues
topic/lfs
topic/mobile
topic/moderation
topic/packages
topic/pr
topic/projects
topic/repo
topic/repo-migration
topic/security
topic/theme
topic/ui
topic/ui-interaction
topic/ux
topic/webhooks
topic/wiki
type/bug
type/deprecation
type/docs
type/enhancement
type/feature
type/miscellaneous
type/proposal
type/question
type/refactoring
type/summary
type/testing
type/upstream
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/gitea#7816
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?