github-starred/gitea
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea.git synced 2026-03-22 22:45:27 -05:00
Code Issues 2.6k Packages Projects Releases 100 Wiki Activity

Grant application for the implementation of federation #7617

New Issue
Open
opened 2025-11-02 07:31:30 -06:00 by GiteaMirror · 11 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 07:31:30 -06:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @pilou- on GitHub (Jul 22, 2021).

Posted on behalf of Loic

Bonjour,

TL;DR: grant application for implementing federation, because it is not making progress (100% transparent)

Despite some interesting discussions late 2020, the magnitude of the effort to move forward with the implementation of federation is apparently too much for the developers currently involved in Gitea. It is best demonstrated by the 5K€ grant earmarked for federation: it did not trigger any proposal. Months ago cjslep suggested applying for a grant (which is an order of magnitude more money) would help and the discussion resumed a week ago.

The conclusion of this conversation was to start working on (i) a generic grant application, (ii) use the material of this generic grant application whenever a call is open that would be a good fit. I will do the legwork, reporting progress here the same day. Full disclosure: although I do not intend to be funded by this grant, it is in sync with the fedeproxy project that I am working on; therefore my interest is not purely altruistic.

The only condition I set for my participation is that the entire process of the grant application is 100% transparent, as well as the work funded by the grant (see the fedeproxy grant to understand exactly what I mean by 100% transparent). @zeripath, cjslep and techknowlogick are aware of this particular requirement and did not raise any concern so far. But if anyone feel like it is too much, please speak up now.

Cheers

Originally created by @pilou- on GitHub (Jul 22, 2021). Posted on behalf of [Loic](https://forum.fedeproxy.eu/t/grant-application-for-federation-in-gitea/284) <hr> Bonjour, TL;DR: grant application for implementing federation, because it is not making progress (100% transparent) Despite some [interesting discussions late 2020](https://discourse.gitea.io/t/forgefed-federation-in-gitea/1157), the magnitude of the effort to move forward with the implementation of federation is apparently too much for the developers currently involved in Gitea. It is best demonstrated by the [5K€ grant](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/14186#issuecomment-875779897) earmarked for federation: it did not trigger any proposal. Months ago [cjslep](https://github.com/cjslep) suggested applying for a grant (which is an order of magnitude more money) would help and [the discussion resumed a week ago](https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/grant-proposal-for-federation-in-gitea/1921). The conclusion of [this conversation](https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/grant-proposal-for-federation-in-gitea/1921) was to start working on (i) a generic grant application, (ii) use the material of this generic grant application whenever a call is open that would be a good fit. I will do the legwork, reporting progress here the same day. Full disclosure: although I do not intend to be funded by this grant, it is in sync with [the fedeproxy project](https://fedeproxy.eu/) that I am working on; therefore my interest is not purely altruistic. The only condition I set for my participation is that **the entire process of the grant application is 100% transparent, as well as the work funded by the grant** (see [the fedeproxy grant to understand exactly what I mean by 100% transparent](https://forum.fedeproxy.eu/t/dapsi-call-deadline-20-01-2021/14)). [@zeripath](https://github.com/zeripath), [cjslep](https://github.com/cjslep) and [techknowlogick](https://github.com/techknowlogick) are aware of this particular requirement and did not raise any concern so far. But if anyone feel like it is too much, please speak up now. Cheers
GiteaMirror added the topic/federation label 2025-11-02 07:31:30 -06:00
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 07:31:30 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@pilou- commented on GitHub (Jul 22, 2021):

Posted on behalf of Loic

Bonjour,

I started working on the generic grant application today and the result is here. You're welcome to participate if you'd like. If you find that mildly exciting I won't be offended: it is quite boring.

As for an actual open call, maybe it would make sense to aim for NGI atlantic call, deadline September 15th, 2021 with a funding range of €25,000 - €75,000. Potential categories that would be a fit are:

  • Topic a: EU – US Experimental Platforms interconnection: this topic invites established designers and facility providers of experimental infrastructures, testbeds, and platforms enabling experimentation in the NGI areas on both sides of the Atlantic to interconnect with each other, to offer their facilities on a continuous basis to its community of experimenters and application developers in other NGI topics.
  • Topic b.3: Service and data portability
  • Topic b.5: Internet data sharing and interoperable services (but that would be streching it too much, IMHO)

That is assuming there exists a counterpart in the US funded by the NSF, which may be a blocker.

Last but not least, there is a licensing question to clarify before moving forward.

I'll resume work here next week.

@pilou- commented on GitHub (Jul 22, 2021): Posted on behalf of [Loic](https://forum.fedeproxy.eu/t/grant-application-for-federation-in-gitea/284/2) <hr> Bonjour, I started working on the generic grant application today and [the result is here](https://demo.hedgedoc.org/K8IDhSxJShOCOWEKILGZeA?view). You're welcome to participate if you'd like. If you find that mildly exciting I won't be offended: it is quite boring. As for an actual open call, maybe it would make sense to aim for [NGI atlantic call](https://ngiatlantic.eu/ngiatlanticeu-4th-open-call), deadline September 15th, 2021 with a funding range of €25,000 - €75,000. Potential categories that would be a fit are: * **Topic a: EU – US Experimental Platforms interconnection:** this topic invites established designers and facility providers of experimental infrastructures, testbeds, and platforms enabling experimentation in the NGI areas on both sides of the Atlantic to interconnect with each other, to offer their facilities on a continuous basis to its community of experimenters and application developers in other NGI topics. * **Topic b.3: Service and data portability** * **Topic b.5: Internet data sharing and interoperable services** (but that would be streching it too much, IMHO) That is assuming there exists a counterpart in the US funded by the NSF, which may be a blocker. Last but not least, there is a [licensing question to clarify](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/14186#issuecomment-884929279) before moving forward. I'll resume work here next week.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 07:31:30 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@pilou- commented on GitHub (Jul 24, 2021):

Posted on behalf of Loic

@zeripath in the 1.16 plan you write "(It's worth noting that although this may appear orthogonal to things like federation - this is key to making federation possible.)". You mentioned this a few times and I concur: authentication / authorization is a building block of federated activities. Maybe I'm stating the obvious but here it is: if issues were created around that topic that clearly articulate how they are relevant to federation, it would be possible to fund their implementation with the money earmarked for federation. My 2cts ;-)

@pilou- commented on GitHub (Jul 24, 2021): Posted on behalf of [Loic](https://forum.fedeproxy.eu/t/advancing-federation-in-gitea/240/20) --- @zeripath in [the 1.16 plan](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/16429#issuecomment-880042684) you write "(It's worth noting that although this may appear orthogonal to things like federation - this is key to making federation possible.)". You mentioned this a few times and I concur: authentication / authorization is a building block of federated activities. Maybe I'm stating the obvious but here it is: if issues were created around that topic that clearly articulate how they are relevant to federation, it would be possible to fund their implementation with the money earmarked for federation. My 2cts ;-)
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 07:31:31 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@zeripath commented on GitHub (Jul 26, 2021):

I'll try to open appropriate issues as I hit them.

@zeripath commented on GitHub (Jul 26, 2021): I'll try to open appropriate issues as I hit them.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 07:31:31 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@pilou- commented on GitHub (Jul 30, 2021):

Posted on behalf of Loic

Bonjour,

TL;DR: first rough draft of the generic grant application (hedgedoc link), expecting bio from zeripath & cjslep

The essentials of the grant application are ready. It went a lot faster than I expected because it was possible to re-use the work done by @cj. It outlines a sensible development plan and is a good starting point. I've added items that were discussed a few weeks ago such as reviewing Gitea PRs unrelated to federation. Or spending time to care for diversity. This is what makes a healthy Free Software community and any grant application should explicitly add those deliverables to be sustainable.

As discussed before, the ideal applicants for this grant application would be cjslep on the go-fed side of things and zeripath, or another core Gitea developer. Although it may not be possible because they are otherwise busy at the time, it would make for a great example if the draft grant application included a description of their background and motivation. Using my background (3.1 in the fedeproxy grant application) and my motivation (3.2 in the fedeproxy grant application) for inspiration.

When actually applying for a grant, another developer is likely to replace one of them, but only this bio would have to be substituted. And the time spent on the onboarding part of the work plan will have to be adjusted accordingly. But the application would otherwise be the same.

zeripath & cjslep do you feel like you could write down something?

Now that the generic grant application is drafted, my next action item will be to rewrite it entirely so that it can be something convincing to a skilled Free Software Go developer. If it can convince them the project is doable and worth pursuing, that will be a first major milestone. I don't mean the polite: "this is awesome!" answer from a friend 😛 I mean the inspired "interesting" answer from a stranger.

If someone finds the time to read the draft and comment on it, that would be ✨ fantastic.

Cheers

@pilou- commented on GitHub (Jul 30, 2021): Posted on behalf of [Loic](https://forum.fedeproxy.eu/t/grant-application-for-federation-in-gitea/284/5) --- Bonjour, TL;DR: [first rough draft of the generic grant application](https://forum.fedeproxy.eu/uploads/short-url/nKnZOPJDg9LLdh9hXMOQaKKqsN3.md) ([hedgedoc link](https://demo.hedgedoc.org/K8IDhSxJShOCOWEKILGZeA?view)), expecting bio from [zeripath](https://github.com/zeripath) & [cjslep](https://github.com/cjslep) The essentials of the grant application are [ready](https://demo.hedgedoc.org/K8IDhSxJShOCOWEKILGZeA). It went a lot faster than I expected because it was possible to re-use [the work done by @cj](https://discourse.gitea.io/t/forgefed-federation-in-gitea/1157). It outlines a sensible development plan and is a good starting point. I've added items that [were discussed a few weeks ago](https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/grant-proposal-for-federation-in-gitea/1921) such as reviewing Gitea PRs unrelated to federation. Or spending time to care for diversity. This is what makes a healthy Free Software community and any grant application should explicitly add those deliverables to be sustainable. As discussed before, the ideal applicants for this grant application would be [cjslep](https://github.com/cjslep) on the go-fed side of things and [zeripath](https://github.com/zeripath), or another core Gitea developer. Although it may not be possible because they are otherwise busy at the time, it would make for a great example if the draft grant application included a description of their background and motivation. Using my background ([3.1 in the fedeproxy grant application](https://forum.fedeproxy.eu/uploads/short-url/67QsDhlh47dpvuJxZf4hAsffZF9.pdf)) and my motivation ([3.2 in the fedeproxy grant application](https://forum.fedeproxy.eu/uploads/short-url/67QsDhlh47dpvuJxZf4hAsffZF9.pdf)) for inspiration. When actually applying for a grant, another developer is likely to replace one of them, but only this bio would have to be substituted. And the time spent on the **onboarding** part of the work plan will have to be adjusted accordingly. But the application would otherwise be the same. [zeripath](https://github.com/zeripath) & [cjslep](https://github.com/cjslep) do you feel like you could write down something? Now that the generic grant application is drafted, my next action item will be to rewrite it entirely so that it can be something convincing to a skilled Free Software Go developer. If it can convince them the project is doable and worth pursuing, that will be a first major milestone. I don't mean the polite: "this is awesome!" answer from a friend :stuck_out_tongue: I mean the inspired "interesting" answer from a stranger. If someone finds the time to read the draft and comment on it, that would be :sparkles: fantastic. Cheers
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 07:31:31 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@pilou- commented on GitHub (Aug 4, 2021):

Posted on behalf of Loic

Regarding the bio part, It needs to be something like (this is mine for the fedeproxy proposal):

Loïc Dachary: In 2001 Dachary raised concerns about centralized proprietary forges and worked with the Free Software Foundation to setup, install and maintain the Savannah forge. He also contributed to the GNA! forge, until 2017, when it shut down. In the recent years Dachary published software to migrate software projects from GitHub to GitLab and infrastructure as code including GitLab deployment Ansible playbooks as well as end to end integration tests for a Django based API server including the automated installation of a GitLab server for the duration of the test.

In other words it does not need to be long but it must be contextualized and someone reading it would know you're a good candidate to implement your part of the project. I find it useful to add URLs where someone can verify the facts (e.g. "XYZ is on of the top N most active Gitea contributors" ).

In addition there needs to be a paragraph about what motivates you to work on federation. Again quoting my part from the forge federation proposal:

In 2018 Dachary closed his GitHub account for ethical reasons and has since been unable to participate in Free Software projects hosted there. The federeration of forges would allow him to reconnect with these projects.

Loïc and Pierre-Louis would both use fedeproxy and contribute to its development if it already existed, on a volunteer basis, because they need it for their day to day work. But the initial effort to create fedeproxy from scratch cannot conveniently be done on a volunteer basis and requires funding. In addition, because Libregerbil is a Free Software service provider, the expertise developed while creating fedeproxy may generate additional income in the future, if a market for the development of federation features emerges.

@pilou- commented on GitHub (Aug 4, 2021): Posted on behalf of [Loic](https://forum.fedeproxy.eu/t/advancing-federation-in-gitea/240/22) --- Regarding the bio part, It needs to be something like (this is mine f[or the fedeproxy proposal](https://forum.fedeproxy.eu/t/about-the-funding-category/19)): > **Loïc Dachary:** In 2001 Dachary raised concerns about centralized proprietary forges and worked with the Free Software Foundation to setup, install and maintain the Savannah forge. He also contributed to the GNA! forge, until 2017, when it shut down. In the recent years Dachary published software to migrate software projects from GitHub to GitLab and infrastructure as code including GitLab deployment Ansible playbooks as well as end to end integration tests for a Django based API server including the automated installation of a GitLab server for the duration of the test. In other words it does not need to be long but it must be contextualized and someone reading it would know you're a good candidate to implement your part of the project. I find it useful to add URLs where someone can verify the facts (e.g. "XYZ is on of the top N most [ active Gitea contributors](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/graphs/contributors?from=2018-09-20&to=2021-08-04&type=c)" ). In addition there needs to be a paragraph about what motivates you to work on federation. Again quoting my part from the forge federation proposal: > In 2018 Dachary [closed his GitHub account for ethical reasons](https://blog.dachary.org/2018/07/29/why-i-deleted-my-github-account/) and has since been unable to participate in Free Software projects hosted there. The federeration of forges would allow him to reconnect with these projects. > > Loïc and Pierre-Louis would both use fedeproxy and contribute to its development if it already existed, on a volunteer basis, because they need it for their day to day work. But the initial effort to create fedeproxy from scratch cannot conveniently be done on a volunteer basis and requires funding. In addition, because Libregerbil is a Free Software service provider, the expertise developed while creating fedeproxy may generate additional income in the future, if a market for the development of federation features emerges.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 07:31:31 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@pilou- commented on GitHub (Aug 4, 2021):

Posted on behalf of Loic

A grant application has a better chance to be considered if it has the backing of known people/organizations and/or many individuals. Gitea is popular and and effort to get such support is likely to succeed.

  1. Is someone willing to advertise this grant proposal and get endorsements and a significant number of individual supporters?
  2. What are the communication channels this person should use?
  3. What kind of message should they send?
@pilou- commented on GitHub (Aug 4, 2021): Posted on behalf of [Loic](https://forum.fedeproxy.eu/t/advancing-federation-in-gitea/240/23) --- A grant application has a better chance to be considered if it has the backing of known people/organizations and/or many individuals. Gitea is popular and and effort to get such support is likely to succeed. 1. Is someone willing to advertise this grant proposal and get endorsements and a significant number of individual supporters? 1. What are the communication channels this person should use? 1. What kind of message should they send?
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 07:31:32 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@pilou- commented on GitHub (Aug 5, 2021):

Posted on behalf of Loic

Bonjour,

TL;DR: first version of the generic grant application ready for comments, expecting bio from zeripath & cjslep.

This first version should contain all the elements needed to fill a grant application with requirements similar to NLnet and DAPSI (links are included in the document itself if you're curious).

In addition to the expected bios it would be useful to get a list of organizations or individuals that would support such a grant application.

There are a few question marks in the grant application for which there does not seem to be a publicly available answer but someone from the Gitea community surely does:

Next week I'll rework the grant proposal based on comments and double check with the grant guidelines that nothing significant is missing.

Cheers

@pilou- commented on GitHub (Aug 5, 2021): Posted on behalf of [Loic](https://forum.fedeproxy.eu/t/grant-application-for-federation-in-gitea/284/16) --- Bonjour, TL;DR: [first version](https://demo.hedgedoc.org/K8IDhSxJShOCOWEKILGZeA?both#) of the generic grant application ready for comments, expecting bio from [zeripath](https://github.com/zeripath) & [cjslep](https://github.com/cjslep). This [first version](https://demo.hedgedoc.org/K8IDhSxJShOCOWEKILGZeA?both#) should contain all the elements needed to fill a grant application with requirements similar to NLnet and DAPSI (links are included in the document itself if you're curious). In addition to the [expected bios](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/16518#issuecomment-892961905) it would be useful to get a list of organizations or individuals that would [support such a grant application](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/16518#issuecomment-892964312). There are a few question marks in the grant application for which there does not seem to be a publicly available answer but someone from the Gitea community surely does: * What is the [contribution of the sponsors listed on the gitea.io homepage](https://gitea.io/)? * Is there an estimate of the number of Gitea installations and/or developers using Gitea? Next week I'll rework the grant proposal based on comments and double check with the grant guidelines that nothing significant is missing. Cheers
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 07:31:32 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@zeripath commented on GitHub (Aug 5, 2021):

Hi Loïc!

Sorry I still haven't provided the bio. Was working on something else this evening - which is hopefully done now.

Will get the bio to you tomorrow.

@zeripath commented on GitHub (Aug 5, 2021): Hi Loïc! Sorry I still haven't provided the bio. Was working on something else this evening - which is hopefully done now. Will get the bio to you tomorrow.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 07:31:32 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@pilou- commented on GitHub (Aug 14, 2021):

Posted on behalf of Loic

Bonjour,

TL;DR: One last call to finalize the grant application, select your availability as soon as possible

The generic grant application is almost done. There are a few blockers that can be quickly resolved during a one hour videoconference. Please select your availability as soon as possible, between August 21st and August 28th. Unless you're on vacation :-P

Once this step is complete, applying for a grant will be a matter of cherry-picking. I would not go as far as to say it is easy, but it certainly is a lot easier than starting from scratch 😅

Cheers

@pilou- commented on GitHub (Aug 14, 2021): Posted on behalf of [Loic](https://forum.fedeproxy.eu/t/grant-application-for-federation-in-gitea/284/20) --- Bonjour, TL;DR: One last call to finalize the grant application, select your [availability as soon as possible](https://framadate.org/jO19mi38nMKWNYbt) The [generic grant application](https://demo.hedgedoc.org/K8IDhSxJShOCOWEKILGZeA?both#) is almost done. There are a **few blockers** that can be quickly resolved during a one hour videoconference. Please select your [availability as soon as possible](https://framadate.org/jO19mi38nMKWNYbt), between August 21st and August 28th. Unless you're on vacation :-P Once this step is complete, applying for a grant will be a matter of cherry-picking. I would not go as far as to say it is easy, but it certainly is a lot easier than starting from scratch :sweat_smile: Cheers
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 07:31:32 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@aschrijver commented on GitHub (Aug 20, 2021):

Posted on behalf of Loic

One last call to finalize the grant application, select your availability as soon as possible

The call is open to everyone and will be at:

https://meet.jit.si/LargeGuidancesStabilizeCleverly Wednesday August 25th, 6pm UTC+2, 2021

The call will be recorded and published the same day. Please speak up now if this prevents you from participating. The proposed agenda is:

@aschrijver commented on GitHub (Aug 20, 2021): Posted on behalf of [Loic](https://forum.fedeproxy.eu/t/grant-application-for-federation-in-gitea/284/24) --- > One last call to finalize the grant application, select your [availability as soon as possible](https://framadate.org/jO19mi38nMKWNYbt) The call is open to everyone and will be at: **https://meet.jit.si/LargeGuidancesStabilizeCleverly Wednesday August 25th, 6pm UTC+2, 2021** The call will be recorded and published the same day. Please speak up now if this prevents you from participating. The proposed agenda is: * Live proofreading of the [executive summary](https://demo.hedgedoc.org/K8IDhSxJShOCOWEKILGZeA?view#Executive-summary): how convincing is it? * Baby step: [create a private key ](https://forum.fedeproxy.eu/t/advancing-federation-in-gitea/240/26). See: #16717 * Looking for individuals & organizations willing to support (i) this grant application and/or (ii) advancing federation in Gitea (what is the contributions of the current [sponsors](https://gitea.io/)?). * Review of the [facts and articles that demonstrate the popularity of Gitea](https://forum.fedeproxy.eu/t/how-popular-is-gitea/332) * Where to advertise the effort towards federation? * First grant application could be sent before [October 1st, 2021 for the NGI Zero Discovery](https://nlnet.nl/discovery/) call
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 07:31:33 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@aschrijver commented on GitHub (Aug 26, 2021):

Posted on behalf of Loic

Today’s videoconference recording. I started the recording late (I keep forgetting). The only thing missing is me reading the introduction of the grant proposal. The video starts when I ask for input to @techknowlogick & @zeripath.

BitTube

Grant application for the implementation of federation in Gitea (2)

Recording of the 2021-08-25 videoconference meeting related to funding the implementation of federation in Gitea. Background information at https://forum.fedeproxy.eu/t/grant-application-for-federation-in-gitea/284/24

Agenda

Action items (before October 1st):

  • @dachary :
    • Update the grant application introduction to (i) include the self-hosted stability benefit that comes with federation (ii) fix the latest paragraph that should not be about user interface (move it up?)
    • Fill the NGI Zero Discovery NLnet application
    • Select tasks that could fit in the NLnet budget
  • @techknowlogick: provide a bio
  • @zeripath @techknowlogick: provide an hourly/daily rate
  • @zeripath @techknowlogick: proofread the NLnet application

Notes

  • NLnet application, if selected, would begin around January 2022
  • Sponsors on gitea.io are “in kind” for the most part, i.e. providing resources like hosting, hardware, services rather than funding
  • Where to advertise the grant?
@aschrijver commented on GitHub (Aug 26, 2021): Posted on behalf of [Loic](https://forum.fedeproxy.eu/t/grant-application-for-federation-in-gitea/284/31) --- Today’s [videoconference recording](https://bittube.video/w/79bc6698-4f0c-4e95-b8cc-00c9a535a289). I started the recording late (I keep forgetting). The only thing missing is me reading the introduction of the grant proposal. The video starts when I ask for input to @techknowlogick & @zeripath. ![](https://forum.fedeproxy.eu/uploads/default/original/1X/893c350de9d983e187a7f6d26b18e04ac56e24af.png) [BitTube](https://bittube.video/w/79bc6698-4f0c-4e95-b8cc-00c9a535a289) ![](https://forum.fedeproxy.eu/uploads/default/original/1X/127d62ba1853d5857374cb959bc68f4bf86c6172.jpeg) ### [Grant application for the implementation of federation in Gitea (2)](https://bittube.video/w/79bc6698-4f0c-4e95-b8cc-00c9a535a289) Recording of the 2021-08-25 videoconference meeting related to funding the implementation of federation in Gitea. Background information at https://forum.fedeproxy.eu/t/grant-application-for-federation-in-gitea/284/24 ### Agenda * Live proofreading of the [executive summary](https://demo.hedgedoc.org/K8IDhSxJShOCOWEKILGZeA?view#Executive-summary): how convincing is it? * Baby steps: * [Implement Nodeinfo endpoints for federation discovery](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/16758) * [Create keypair per user for signing federated requests](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/16717) * Looking for individuals & organizations willing to support (i) this grant application and/or (ii) advancing federation in Gitea (what is the contributions of the current [sponsors](https://gitea.io/)?). * Review of the [facts and articles that demonstrate the popularity of Gitea](https://forum.fedeproxy.eu/t/how-popular-is-gitea/332) * Where to advertise the effort towards federation? * First grant application could be sent before [October 1st, 2021 for the NGI Zero Discovery](https://nlnet.nl/discovery/) call ### Action items (before October 1st): * @dachary : * Update the grant application introduction to (i) include the self-hosted stability benefit that comes with federation (ii) fix the latest paragraph that should not be about user interface (move it up?) * Fill the [NGI Zero Discovery NLnet](https://nlnet.nl/discovery/) application * Select tasks that could fit in the NLnet budget * @techknowlogick: provide a bio * @zeripath @techknowlogick: provide an hourly/daily rate * @zeripath @techknowlogick: proofread the NLnet application ### Notes * NLnet application, if selected, would begin around January 2022 * Sponsors on [gitea.io](http://gitea.io) are “in kind” for the most part, i.e. providing resources like hosting, hardware, services rather than funding * Where to advertise the grant? * [blog](https://blog.gitea.io/) * [twitter](https://twitter.com/go-gitea) * [OpenCollective](https://opencollective.com/gitea) * [reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Gitea/)
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
$20
$250
$50
$500
backport/done
💎 Bounty
docs-update-needed
good first issue
hacktoberfest
issue/bounty
issue/confirmed
issue/critical
issue/duplicate
issue/needs-feedback
issue/not-a-bug
issue/regression
issue/stale
issue/workaround
lgtm/need 2
modifies/api
modifies/translation
outdated/backport/v1.18
outdated/theme/markdown
outdated/theme/timetracker
performance/bigrepo
performance/cpu
performance/memory
performance/speed
pr/breaking
proposal/accepted
proposal/rejected
pr/wip
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 reviewed/wontfix
💰 Rewarded
skip-changelog
status/blocked
topic/accessibility
topic/api
topic/authentication
topic/build
topic/code-linting
topic/commit-signing
topic/content-rendering
topic/deployment
topic/distribution
topic/federation
topic/gitea-actions
topic/issues
topic/lfs
topic/mobile
topic/moderation
topic/packages
topic/pr
topic/projects
topic/repo
topic/repo-migration
topic/security
topic/theme
topic/ui
topic/ui-interaction
topic/ux
topic/webhooks
topic/wiki
type/bug
type/deprecation
type/docs
type/enhancement
type/feature
type/miscellaneous
type/proposal
type/question
type/refactoring
type/summary
type/testing
type/upstream
No Label topic/federation
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/gitea#7617
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?