github-starred/gitea
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea.git synced 2026-03-11 17:46:29 -05:00
Code Issues 2.6k Packages Projects Releases 100 Wiki Activity

[Bug] markdown link formater cant pars issue-url including comment-link #6453

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-11-02 06:56:29 -06:00 by GiteaMirror · 5 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 06:56:29 -06:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @6543 on GitHub (Dec 4, 2020).

Copy from https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/212

I just commented including this code:

and https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/140#issuecomment-49756 is now
-> and #140 now

so both the issue is not linked and the word after the URL is removed.

Inserting a second space after the url like so works:
and https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/140#issuecomment-49756 is now
-> and [#140](https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/140#issuecomment-49756) now

Originally created by @6543 on GitHub (Dec 4, 2020). Copy from https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/212 --- I just commented including this code: `and https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/140#issuecomment-49756 is now` -> `and #140 now` so both the issue is not linked and the word after the URL is removed. Inserting a second space after the url like so works: `and https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/140#issuecomment-49756 is now` -> `and [#140](https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/140#issuecomment-49756) now` --- - Gitea version (or commit ref): 1.12.6 - master (1.14.0+dev-311-g3512c7e40) - Can you reproduce the bug at https://try.gitea.io: - https://try.gitea.io/abcKing/noReaction/issues/1#issuecomment-70736
GiteaMirror added the type/bug label 2025-11-02 06:56:29 -06:00
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 06:56:31 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@noerw commented on GitHub (Sep 25, 2021):

In 1.16.0+dev-248-g45ebcb0d1 a new regression exists (not present in 1.15 as far as i can tell):

For a URL like https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/410#issue-97552 a reference is correctly detected, but the URL is empty

image

@noerw commented on GitHub (Sep 25, 2021): In 1.16.0+dev-248-g45ebcb0d1 a new regression exists (not present in 1.15 as far as i can tell): For a URL like `https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/410#issue-97552` a reference is correctly detected, but the URL is empty ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/7880552/134768660-ca428f2f-1c53-41a0-b546-b406bf3ea0d6.png)
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 06:56:31 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@fnetX commented on GitHub (Nov 20, 2021):

The original issue seems to be fixed in 1.15, does the regression still exist?

@fnetX commented on GitHub (Nov 20, 2021): The original issue seems to be fixed in 1.15, does the regression still exist?
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 06:56:31 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@lunny commented on GitHub (Nov 22, 2021):

@fnetX I think no. It's reported in v1.14. Let's close and feel free to reopen it if it's not resolved.

@lunny commented on GitHub (Nov 22, 2021): @fnetX I think no. It's reported in v1.14. Let's close and feel free to reopen it if it's not resolved.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 06:56:31 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@wxiaoguang commented on GitHub (Nov 22, 2021):

I remember that I fixed a markdown bug:

Are they related?

@wxiaoguang commented on GitHub (Nov 22, 2021): I remember that I fixed a markdown bug: * https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/17411 Are they related?
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 06:56:31 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@fnetX commented on GitHub (Nov 22, 2021):

Yeah, #17394 is a dupe.

@fnetX commented on GitHub (Nov 22, 2021): Yeah, #17394 is a dupe.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
$20
$250
$50
$500
backport/done
💎 Bounty
docs-update-needed
good first issue
hacktoberfest
issue/bounty
issue/confirmed
issue/critical
issue/duplicate
issue/needs-feedback
issue/not-a-bug
issue/regression
issue/stale
issue/workaround
lgtm/need 2
modifies/api
modifies/translation
outdated/backport/v1.18
outdated/theme/markdown
outdated/theme/timetracker
performance/bigrepo
performance/cpu
performance/memory
performance/speed
pr/breaking
proposal/accepted
proposal/rejected
pr/wip
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 reviewed/wontfix
💰 Rewarded
skip-changelog
status/blocked
topic/accessibility
topic/api
topic/authentication
topic/build
topic/code-linting
topic/commit-signing
topic/content-rendering
topic/deployment
topic/distribution
topic/federation
topic/gitea-actions
topic/issues
topic/lfs
topic/mobile
topic/moderation
topic/packages
topic/pr
topic/projects
topic/repo
topic/repo-migration
topic/security
topic/theme
topic/ui
topic/ui-interaction
topic/ux
topic/webhooks
topic/wiki
type/bug
type/deprecation
type/docs
type/enhancement
type/feature
type/miscellaneous
type/proposal
type/question
type/refactoring
type/summary
type/testing
type/upstream
No Label type/bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/gitea#6453
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?