github-starred/gitea
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea.git synced 2026-03-17 13:42:23 -05:00
Code Issues 2.6k Packages Projects Releases 100 Wiki Activity

Issue/PR labels arc-green contrast issue introduced by #13181 #6196

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-11-02 06:47:58 -06:00 by GiteaMirror · 3 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 06:47:58 -06:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @wULLSnpAXbWZGYDYyhWTKKspEQoaYxXyhoisqHf on GitHub (Oct 22, 2020).

  • Gitea version (or commit ref): Gitea version 1.14.0+dev-56-ge964c6ec1 built with GNU Make 4.3, go1.15.3 : bindata, sqlite, sqlite_unlock_notify
  • Git version: git version 2.29.0.311.g38ddec7408
  • Operating system: Arch Linux
  • Built from source:
    • Yes
  • Run with:
    • systemd
  • Database:
    • SQLite
  • Can you reproduce the bug at https://try.gitea.io:
    • No

Description

I just recently noticed there has been a change to how labels are displayed in Issue/PR feeds when using arc-green theme.
Colourful labels are gone due to an addition from #13181 , precisely - file theme-arc-green.less, line 622.
This overrides the labels original colours and everything now looks grim.
While I understand the line was added for a reason, this most certainly was not it.

Screenshots

now - grim:
image
image
image

before - colourful:
image
image
image

Originally created by @wULLSnpAXbWZGYDYyhWTKKspEQoaYxXyhoisqHf on GitHub (Oct 22, 2020). - Gitea version (or commit ref): `Gitea version 1.14.0+dev-56-ge964c6ec1 built with GNU Make 4.3, go1.15.3 : bindata, sqlite, sqlite_unlock_notify` - Git version: `git version 2.29.0.311.g38ddec7408` - Operating system: Arch Linux - Built from source: - [x] Yes - Run with: - [x] systemd - Database: - [x] SQLite - Can you reproduce the bug at https://try.gitea.io: - [x] No ## Description I just recently noticed there has been a change to how labels are displayed in Issue/PR feeds when using `arc-green` theme. Colourful labels are gone due to an addition from #13181 , precisely - [file `theme-arc-green.less`, line 622](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/13181/files#diff-b6a7d7461f3f50080599d288d49112f39678fec7ce75603a3b9bc1511be2a87bR622). This overrides the labels original colours and everything now looks grim. While I understand the line was added for a reason, this most certainly was not it. ## Screenshots now - grim: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/61180606/96875579-a5304580-1477-11eb-9cc5-41a11841864f.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/61180606/96875628-b7aa7f00-1477-11eb-89f4-0c2f713fb2a8.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/61180606/96875897-0ce69080-1478-11eb-8946-0101608e55c5.png) before - colourful: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/61180606/96875688-cc871280-1477-11eb-8b8c-460e69d1b17d.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/61180606/96875718-dad52e80-1477-11eb-93f6-17dfa18c35f2.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/61180606/96875802-f3dddf80-1477-11eb-9fd4-f75b95ad0f48.png)
GiteaMirror added the topic/uitype/bug labels 2025-11-02 06:47:58 -06:00
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 06:47:59 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@6543 commented on GitHub (Oct 22, 2020):

ping @ivanvc

@6543 commented on GitHub (Oct 22, 2020): ping @ivanvc
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 06:47:59 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@zeripath commented on GitHub (Oct 22, 2020):

And now we see why !important is a bad idea...

@zeripath commented on GitHub (Oct 22, 2020): And now we see why `!important` is a bad idea...
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 06:47:59 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@ivanvc commented on GitHub (Oct 22, 2020):

Darn, I had to add !important as another style was overriding the color for the labels I added. I can take this issue :D

@ivanvc commented on GitHub (Oct 22, 2020): Darn, I had to add `!important` as another style was overriding the color for the labels I added. I can take this issue :D
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
$20
$250
$50
$500
backport/done
💎 Bounty
docs-update-needed
good first issue
hacktoberfest
issue/bounty
issue/confirmed
issue/critical
issue/duplicate
issue/needs-feedback
issue/not-a-bug
issue/regression
issue/stale
issue/workaround
lgtm/need 2
modifies/api
modifies/translation
outdated/backport/v1.18
outdated/theme/markdown
outdated/theme/timetracker
performance/bigrepo
performance/cpu
performance/memory
performance/speed
pr/breaking
proposal/accepted
proposal/rejected
pr/wip
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 reviewed/wontfix
💰 Rewarded
skip-changelog
status/blocked
topic/accessibility
topic/api
topic/authentication
topic/build
topic/code-linting
topic/commit-signing
topic/content-rendering
topic/deployment
topic/distribution
topic/federation
topic/gitea-actions
topic/issues
topic/lfs
topic/mobile
topic/moderation
topic/packages
topic/pr
topic/projects
topic/repo
topic/repo-migration
topic/security
topic/theme
topic/ui
topic/ui-interaction
topic/ux
topic/webhooks
topic/wiki
type/bug
type/deprecation
type/docs
type/enhancement
type/feature
type/miscellaneous
type/proposal
type/question
type/refactoring
type/summary
type/testing
type/upstream
No Label topic/ui type/bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/gitea#6196
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?