New Gitea-Logo #532

@hughesjs commented on GitHub (Mar 20, 2017):

I must say I like this... A lot.
As an extension to this, it would be nice to be able to define custom logos.

@hughesjs commented on GitHub (Mar 20, 2017): I must say I like this... A lot. As an extension to this, it would be nice to be able to define custom logos.

GiteaMirror commented

@lunny commented on GitHub (Mar 20, 2017):

Custom Logo is already supported. See https://docs.gitea.io about Customizing Gitea

@lunny commented on GitHub (Mar 20, 2017): Custom Logo is already supported. See https://docs.gitea.io about `Customizing Gitea`

GiteaMirror commented

@hughesjs commented on GitHub (Mar 20, 2017):

lunny, all I can see under that section is the avatar not the actual gitea branding

@hughesjs commented on GitHub (Mar 20, 2017): lunny, all I can see under that section is the avatar not the actual gitea branding

GiteaMirror commented

@andreynering commented on GitHub (Mar 20, 2017):

I think I like this more than https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/1260, but both are good.

Maybe the cup and the tag should be squares instead of rectangles. Otherwise the logo may not fit well in the favicon or in the Gitea navbar.

@andreynering commented on GitHub (Mar 20, 2017): I think I like this more than https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/1260, but both are good. Maybe the cup and the tag should be squares instead of rectangles. Otherwise the logo may not fit well in the favicon or in the Gitea navbar.

GiteaMirror commented

@silverwind commented on GitHub (Mar 20, 2017):

The smaller versions look too similar to the git logo imho:

@silverwind commented on GitHub (Mar 20, 2017): The smaller versions look too similar to the git logo imho: ![](https://git-scm.com/images/logos/logomark-orange@2x.png)

GiteaMirror commented

@Fastidious commented on GitHub (Mar 20, 2017):

@silverwind it is intended. It is about an application which sole existence revolves around git. I see absolutely no issue with it.

@Fastidious commented on GitHub (Mar 20, 2017): @silverwind it is intended. It is about an application which sole existence revolves around git. I see absolutely no issue with it.

GiteaMirror commented

@kolaente commented on GitHub (Mar 20, 2017):

@Fastidious @silverwind we wouldn't get any liscening problems with it at git is also an open-source project, wouldn't we?
But to be sure, we maybe should change the color to green, also because green is somehow more of a "gitea-color"

@kolaente commented on GitHub (Mar 20, 2017): @Fastidious @silverwind we wouldn't get any liscening problems with it at git is also an open-source project, wouldn't we? But to be sure, we maybe should change the color to green, also because green is somehow more of a "gitea-color"

GiteaMirror commented

@hughesjs commented on GitHub (Mar 20, 2017):

I definitely prefer this to #1260, if it's of any importance I just held a snap poll and my office is split 12/4 in favour of this one ;p

@hughesjs commented on GitHub (Mar 20, 2017): I definitely prefer this to #1260, if it's of any importance I just held a snap poll and my office is split 12/4 in favour of this one ;p

GiteaMirror commented

@silverwind commented on GitHub (Mar 20, 2017):

Well, I'd prefer a different color at least. like the green ones in https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/1260.

I'm not sure I like the logo here. The big one is a bit too complex for my taste, and the smaller ones aren't square which can be an issue.

@silverwind commented on GitHub (Mar 20, 2017): Well, I'd prefer a different color at least. like the green ones in https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/1260. I'm not sure I like the logo here. The big one is a bit too complex for my taste, and the smaller ones aren't square which can be an issue.

GiteaMirror commented

@kolaente commented on GitHub (Mar 20, 2017):

I've changed the colour to green, also darkened the colour of the cup a bit and shortened the teabag rope. I think it is better recognizable with the green colour (so you won't think it is "the" git).

@kolaente commented on GitHub (Mar 20, 2017): I've changed the colour to green, also darkened the colour of the cup a bit and shortened the teabag rope. I think it is better recognizable with the green colour (so you won't think it is "the" git). ![gitea-logo_v2](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/13721712/24114544/f0d3cb4c-0da0-11e7-8ac6-f60b36808018.png)

GiteaMirror commented

@lunny commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2017):

I like the green one.

@lunny commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2017): I like the green one.

GiteaMirror commented

@sailfish009 commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2017):

me, too. green!

@sailfish009 commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2017): me, too. green!

GiteaMirror commented

@appleboy commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2017):

green + 1

@appleboy commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2017): green + 1

GiteaMirror commented

@go2sh commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2017):

Very nice. Great work!

@go2sh commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2017): Very nice. Great work!

GiteaMirror commented

@lcges commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2017):

The favicon is barely visible, too much detail.

@lcges commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2017): The favicon is barely visible, too much detail.

GiteaMirror commented

@kolaente commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2017):

@qdbdbp Yes, i'd agree with that. But i think the favicon would be recognizable as the one of Gitea by the coulour and the white kinda-thing (-> the git icon). It's the same with the gitlogo.

(Gitlogo for comparison)

@kolaente commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2017): @qdbdbp Yes, i'd agree with that. But i think the favicon would be recognizable as the one of Gitea by the coulour and the white kinda-thing (-> the git icon). It's the same with the gitlogo. ![gitea-logo_v2_fav](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/13721712/24153214/1fef6280-0e4e-11e7-9b97-4e5724c509b6.png) (Gitlogo for comparison)

GiteaMirror commented

@kolaente commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2017):

I've made a quick test for the favicon and decided to shorten the rope even more.

First Try:

Final Result:

@kolaente commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2017): I've made a quick test for the favicon and decided to shorten the rope even more. First Try: ![bildschirmfoto von 2017-03-21 15-53-38](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/13721712/24153394/97afcf62-0e4e-11e7-8e1d-58759450af3f.png) Final Result: ![bildschirmfoto von 2017-03-21 16-00-04](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/13721712/24153704/7bbf1820-0e4f-11e7-9d18-0c44ea052fdc.png)

GiteaMirror commented

@Fastidious commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2017):

Small icon still looks odd, and rather out of place.

@Fastidious commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2017): Small icon still looks odd, and rather out of place.

GiteaMirror commented

@kolaente commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2017):

Removed the rope completly:

@kolaente commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2017): Removed the rope completly: ![bildschirmfoto von 2017-03-21 16-36-46](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/13721712/24155613/a22805ee-0e54-11e7-96fe-b598075e4a0f.png)

GiteaMirror commented

@lunny commented on GitHub (Mar 22, 2017):

But in fact, maybe this cup is not a traditional tea cup. But the original cup is. At least in China.

@lunny commented on GitHub (Mar 22, 2017): But in fact, maybe this cup is not a traditional tea cup. But the original cup is. At least in China.

GiteaMirror commented