New Logo Gitea #500

@davydov-vyacheslav commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2017):

I like this one

@davydov-vyacheslav commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2017): I like this one ![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/9931946/23941519/c19b643a-0971-11e7-97be-ec53cb9fa66f.png)

GiteaMirror commented

@lunny commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2017):

@qdbdbp how about deep green one? or red cup and green tea pack

@lunny commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2017): @qdbdbp how about deep green one? or red cup and green tea pack

GiteaMirror commented

@lunny commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2017):

agree with @davydov-vyacheslav

@lunny commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2017): agree with @davydov-vyacheslav

GiteaMirror commented

@andreynering commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2017):

I also like this one.

But maybe with Gitea green as @lunny said #8BC34A

@andreynering commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2017): I also like [this one](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/9931946/23941519/c19b643a-0971-11e7-97be-ec53cb9fa66f.png). But maybe with Gitea green as @lunny said #8BC34A

GiteaMirror commented

@tboerger commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2017):

I also like the mentioned one

@tboerger commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2017): I also like the mentioned one

GiteaMirror commented

@pgaskin commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2017):

I like the mentioned one, but green. I also like the first top one, but maybe make everything lowercase.

@pgaskin commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2017): I like the mentioned one, but green. I also like the first top one, but maybe make everything lowercase.

GiteaMirror commented

@metalmatze commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2017):

Yes, a green version would be very nice. And just an idea: How about we move the git logo into the center of the cup?.
For lower resolutions the logo without the string to the git logo would be nice, and for really small logo sizes, like favicons, maybe just the cup, without anything else?!

@metalmatze commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2017): Yes, a green version would be very nice. And just an idea: How about we move the git logo into the center of the cup?. For lower resolutions the logo without the string to the git logo would be nice, and for really small logo sizes, like favicons, maybe just the cup, without anything else?!

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-02 03:25:42 -06:00

@lcges commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2017):

Another proposal logo. I look forward to the discussions.

@metalmatze I think so, with a low resolution, details will disappear.
Good movement will be making, few levels in graphic logo.

@lcges commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2017): Another proposal logo. I look forward to the discussions. @metalmatze I think so, with a low resolution, details will disappear. Good movement will be making, few levels in graphic logo. ![gitea_logo](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/19255071/23969762/d9db0e8c-09c7-11e7-815b-d7f17d168ce4.png)

GiteaMirror commented

@davydov-vyacheslav commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2017):

We do need some kind of voting plugin :)
as for me, I like 1 and 5 .... the next closest is 2 , but there is something I can't explain which is repels me :(

@davydov-vyacheslav commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2017): We do need some kind of voting plugin :) as for me, I like 1 and 5 .... the next closest is 2 , but there is something I can't explain which is repels me :(

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-02 03:25:42 -06:00

@sailfish009 commented on GitHub (Mar 16, 2017):

i like 5.

@sailfish009 commented on GitHub (Mar 16, 2017): i like 5.

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-02 03:25:42 -06:00

@lunny commented on GitHub (Mar 16, 2017):

1

@lunny commented on GitHub (Mar 16, 2017): 1

GiteaMirror commented

@lunny commented on GitHub (Mar 16, 2017):

2

@lunny commented on GitHub (Mar 16, 2017): 2

GiteaMirror commented

@lunny commented on GitHub (Mar 16, 2017):

3

@lunny commented on GitHub (Mar 16, 2017): 3

GiteaMirror commented

@lunny commented on GitHub (Mar 16, 2017):

4

@lunny commented on GitHub (Mar 16, 2017): 4

GiteaMirror commented

@lunny commented on GitHub (Mar 16, 2017):

5

@lunny commented on GitHub (Mar 16, 2017): 5

GiteaMirror commented

@lunny commented on GitHub (Mar 16, 2017):

6

@lunny commented on GitHub (Mar 16, 2017): 6

GiteaMirror commented

@bkcsoft commented on GitHub (Mar 16, 2017):

I like 5 with the logo from 2 but the logo being red from 1 :trollface: (really though, I like 5)

Maybe a black/white version as well for icons? 😄

@bkcsoft commented on GitHub (Mar 16, 2017): I like 5 with the logo from 2 but the logo being red from 1 :trollface: (really though, I like 5) Maybe a black/white version as well for icons? 😄

GiteaMirror commented

@lunny commented on GitHub (Mar 16, 2017):

@bkcsoft add your reaction to vote.

@lunny commented on GitHub (Mar 16, 2017): @bkcsoft `add your reaction` to vote.

GiteaMirror commented

@lotus-king commented on GitHub (Mar 17, 2017):

I like 6

@lotus-king commented on GitHub (Mar 17, 2017): I like 6

GiteaMirror commented

@lunny commented on GitHub (Mar 17, 2017):

@lotus-king please add your reaction on my commented 6.

@lunny commented on GitHub (Mar 17, 2017): @lotus-king please `add your reaction` on my commented 6.

GiteaMirror commented

@grissiom commented on GitHub (Mar 17, 2017):

I'm in favor of 5 but it give me a feeling that the git logo is turning over. So I rotate the logo a bit in order to make it more balanced:

This is just a proposal any way ;-)

@grissiom commented on GitHub (Mar 17, 2017): I'm in favor of 5 but it give me a feeling that the git logo is turning over. So I rotate the logo a bit in order to make it more balanced: ![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/36101/24045099/e3ae22b8-0b58-11e7-8dd1-cc05f904c941.png) This is just a proposal any way ;-)

GiteaMirror commented

@andreynering commented on GitHub (Mar 17, 2017):

I like 2, but maybe with a stronger orange (like 1) and green (like 5).

@andreynering commented on GitHub (Mar 17, 2017): I like 2, but maybe with a stronger orange (like 1) and green (like 5).

GiteaMirror commented

@ptman commented on GitHub (Mar 17, 2017):

Red-green color blindness is the most common form of color blindness

@ptman commented on GitHub (Mar 17, 2017): Red-green color blindness is the most common form of color blindness

GiteaMirror commented

@kolaente commented on GitHub (Mar 17, 2017):

I think the fifth' green is a bit to sharp and won't match the overall "look and feel" of gitea (Flat, light colors, etc)

Therefore i'd rather go for the 2 or 4

@kolaente commented on GitHub (Mar 17, 2017): I think the fifth' green is a bit to sharp and won't match the overall "look and feel" of gitea (Flat, light colors, etc) Therefore i'd rather go for the 2 or 4

GiteaMirror commented

@bkcsoft commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2017):

@grissiom others logos should be used as-is if at all, so rotating it is a bad idea 🙂

@bkcsoft commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2017): @grissiom others logos should be used as-is if at all, so rotating it is a bad idea 🙂

GiteaMirror commented

@lcges commented on GitHub (Mar 29, 2017):

I present an example of scaling the logo.
16x16 offers without teabag.

@lcges commented on GitHub (Mar 29, 2017): I present an example of scaling the logo. 16x16 offers without teabag. ![logo6](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/19255071/24450561/a14d7564-147b-11e7-8ae4-10ec46479cce.jpg)

GiteaMirror commented

@appleboy commented on GitHub (Mar 29, 2017):

so cute.

@appleboy commented on GitHub (Mar 29, 2017): so cute.

GiteaMirror commented

@lcges commented on GitHub (Apr 13, 2017):

Any decisions we make about the future logo?
Would I suggest voting between the two types of logo?

@lcges commented on GitHub (Apr 13, 2017): Any decisions we make about the future logo? Would I suggest voting between the two types of logo?

GiteaMirror commented

@lunny commented on GitHub (Apr 13, 2017):

I think close all the old related issues and make a new issue to vote between the two is a good idea.

@lunny commented on GitHub (Apr 13, 2017): I think close all the old related issues and make a new issue to vote between the two is a good idea.

GiteaMirror commented

@lunny commented on GitHub (Apr 19, 2017):

Both the two design in #1260 and #1312 are very excellent, but only one could become the official LOGO. I think the Green Tea Cup in this issue win the votes, it retrieves 24 votes but in #1312 the red one retrieves 15 and green on retrieves 14. @qdbdbp @kolaente So @qdbdbp please send a PR to replace the old LOGO to the new one so that we can merge it in v1.2. Please discuss here if you have any new opinion.

@lunny commented on GitHub (Apr 19, 2017): Both the two design in #1260 and #1312 are very excellent, but only one could become the official LOGO. I think the Green Tea Cup in this issue win the votes, it retrieves 24 votes but in #1312 the red one retrieves 15 and green on retrieves 14. @qdbdbp @kolaente So @qdbdbp please send a PR to replace the old LOGO to the new one so that we can merge it in v1.2. Please discuss here if you have any new opinion.

GiteaMirror commented

@jhasse commented on GitHub (Apr 19, 2017):

I think the Green Tea Cup in this issue win the votes, it retrieves 24 votes but in #1312 the red one retrieves 15 and green on retrieves 14.

I don't think that's fair as this issue has got a lot more attention then #1312.

@jhasse commented on GitHub (Apr 19, 2017): > I think the Green Tea Cup in this issue win the votes, it retrieves 24 votes but in #1312 the red one retrieves 15 and green on retrieves 14. I don't think that's fair as this issue has got a lot more attention then #1312.

GiteaMirror commented

@lunny commented on GitHub (Apr 19, 2017):

@jhasse where is the unfair?

@lunny commented on GitHub (Apr 19, 2017): @jhasse where is the unfair?

GiteaMirror commented