Stable version tag for Docker #4992

New Issue

GiteaMirror · 2025-11-02T06:10:20-06:00

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-02 06:10:20 -06:00

Originally created by @alexanderadam on GitHub (Mar 3, 2020).

Description

Would it be possible to have a stable version tag? Something like an alias called 1-stable that will always return the latest but stable build for version 1 (seems that this is not always the case)?

Originally created by @alexanderadam on GitHub (Mar 3, 2020). ## Description Would it be possible to have a stable version tag? Something like an alias called `1-stable` that will always return the latest but stable build for version `1` (seems that [this is not always the case](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/10657))?

GiteaMirror added the type/proposal label 2025-11-02 06:10:20 -06:00

GiteaMirror closed this issue

2025-11-02 06:10:20 -06:00

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-02 06:10:21 -06:00

@sapk commented on GitHub (Mar 3, 2020):

We could. This has already been discussed to also change what 1 and 1.11 tag means.
Actually 1 and 1.11 mean latest 1.11.x tag (what I would call stable) and that the default comportement of the drone plugin we use.
From my point of view that would add another pipeline configuration for such case which add complexity to a file that is already complex. I think that people that would use this tag could easely build the image locally from the last commit themself.
To be clear, this is only my point of view and why I am not in favor but if someone want to do it and it get 2 validation I wouldn't block because maybe I simply doesn't see the full need.

@sapk commented on GitHub (Mar 3, 2020): We could. This has already been discussed to also change what `1` and `1.11` tag means. Actually `1` and `1.11` mean latest `1.11.x` tag (what I would call stable) and that the default comportement of the drone plugin we use. From my point of view that would add another pipeline configuration for such case which add complexity to a file that is already complex. I think that people that would use this tag could easely build the image locally from the last commit themself. To be clear, this is only my point of view and why I am not in favor but if someone want to do it and it get 2 validation I wouldn't block because maybe I simply doesn't see the full need.

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-02 06:10:21 -06:00

@alexanderadam commented on GitHub (Mar 3, 2020):

Ah, in that case 1 is what I'm looking for and I'm happy with it. 👍

@alexanderadam commented on GitHub (Mar 3, 2020): Ah, in that case `1` is what I'm looking for and I'm happy with it. :+1:

GiteaMirror referenced this issue

2025-11-02 14:20:40 -06:00

[PR #5026] [MERGED] Remove links from topics in edit mode #17599

Sign in to join this conversation.