Make Issues list more like GitHub's #437

New Issue

GiteaMirror · 2025-11-02T03:23:25-06:00

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-02 03:23:25 -06:00

Originally created by @Fastidious on GitHub (Mar 7, 2017).

Gitea version (or commit ref): N/A
Git version: N/A
Operating system: N/A
Database (use [x]): N/A
- PostgreSQL
- MySQL
- SQLite
Can you reproduce the bug at https://try.gitea.io:
- Yes (provide example URL) N/A
- No
- Not relevant
Log gist:

Description

The Issues page should be made to look more like GitHub’s. As it is right now, it sticks like a sore thumb to the rest of the application (). Since gitea, just like gogs, are modelled after GitHub, why stop half way?

Compare Gitea's:

To GitHub’s:

Originally created by @Fastidious on GitHub (Mar 7, 2017). - Gitea version (or commit ref): `N/A` - Git version: `N/A` - Operating system: `N/A` - Database (use `[x]`): `N/A` - [ ] PostgreSQL - [ ] MySQL - [ ] SQLite - Can you reproduce the bug at https://try.gitea.io: - [x] Yes (provide example URL) `N/A` - [ ] No - [ ] Not relevant - Log gist: ## Description The `Issues` page should be made to look more like GitHub’s. As it is right now, it sticks like a sore thumb to the rest of the application (). Since `gitea`, just like `gogs`, are modelled after GitHub, why stop half way? Compare Gitea's: ![screen shot 2017-03-07 at 07 29 06](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/8352292/23656467/d91efd3a-0307-11e7-984c-2a55532870ac.png) To GitHub’s: ![screen shot 2017-03-07 at 07 29 17](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/8352292/23656486/ed81b0a6-0307-11e7-8ad0-e6098b4400b2.png)

GiteaMirror added the type/proposal label 2025-11-02 03:23:25 -06:00

GiteaMirror closed this issue

2025-11-02 03:23:25 -06:00

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-02 03:23:25 -06:00

@moltam commented on GitHub (Mar 13, 2017):

I don't know if you guys are aware of this, but an exact clone could be problematic.

@moltam commented on GitHub (Mar 13, 2017): I don't know if you guys are aware of this, but [an exact clone could be problematic](http://gitbucket.github.io/gitbucket-news/gitbucket/2016/03/20/change-user-interface.html).

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-02 03:23:25 -06:00

@lesderid commented on GitHub (Apr 9, 2017):

@moltam That doesn't seem like a valid reason not to do it.

@lesderid commented on GitHub (Apr 9, 2017): @moltam That doesn't seem like a valid reason not to do it.

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-02 03:23:26 -06:00

@moltam commented on GitHub (Apr 9, 2017):

@lesderid I am not against it. Just wanted to share this, to make sure gitea stays different enough from github (as it is now).

@moltam commented on GitHub (Apr 9, 2017): @lesderid I am not against it. Just wanted to share this, to make sure gitea stays different enough from github (as it is now).

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-02 03:23:26 -06:00

@bkcsoft commented on GitHub (Apr 18, 2017):

@Fastidious as @moltam pointed out, making an exact clone has legal implications. Also while the design is borrowed from GitHub, Gitea is not a straight up clone of GitHub, there will be subtle (or not so subtle) differences here and there 🙂

@bkcsoft commented on GitHub (Apr 18, 2017): @Fastidious as @moltam pointed out, making an exact clone has legal implications. Also while the design is borrowed from GitHub, Gitea is not a straight up clone of GitHub, there will be subtle (or not so subtle) differences here and there 🙂

GiteaMirror referenced this issue

2025-11-02 11:45:14 -06:00

[PR #437] [MERGED] Add Korean support #15379

Sign in to join this conversation.

Branches Tags

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/gitea#437