mirror of
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea.git
synced 2026-03-12 02:24:21 -05:00
Closed
opened 2025-11-02 05:34:36 -06:00 by GiteaMirror
·
9 comments
No Branch/Tag Specified
main
release/v1.25
release/v1.24
release/v1.23
release/v1.22
release/v1.21
release/v1.20
release/v1.19
release/v1.18
release/v1.17
release/v1.16
release/v1.15
release/v1.14
release/v1.13
release/v1.12
release/v1.11
release/v1.10
release/v1.9
release/v1.8
v1.25.3
v1.25.2
v1.25.1
v1.25.0
v1.24.7
v1.25.0-rc0
v1.26.0-dev
v1.24.6
v1.24.5
v1.24.4
v1.24.3
v1.24.2
v1.24.1
v1.24.0
v1.23.8
v1.24.0-rc0
v1.25.0-dev
v1.23.7
v1.23.6
v1.23.5
v1.23.4
v1.23.3
v1.23.2
v1.23.1
v1.23.0
v1.23.0-rc0
v1.24.0-dev
v1.22.6
v1.22.5
v1.22.4
v1.22.3
v1.22.2
v1.22.1
v1.22.0
v1.23.0-dev
v1.22.0-rc1
v1.21.11
v1.22.0-rc0
v1.21.10
v1.21.9
v1.21.8
v1.21.7
v1.21.6
v1.21.5
v1.21.4
v1.21.3
v1.21.2
v1.20.6
v1.21.1
v1.21.0
v1.21.0-rc2
v1.21.0-rc1
v1.20.5
v1.22.0-dev
v1.21.0-rc0
v1.20.4
v1.20.3
v1.20.2
v1.20.1
v1.20.0
v1.19.4
v1.21.0-dev
v1.20.0-rc2
v1.20.0-rc1
v1.20.0-rc0
v1.19.3
v1.19.2
v1.19.1
v1.19.0
v1.19.0-rc1
v1.20.0-dev
v1.19.0-rc0
v1.18.5
v1.18.4
v1.18.3
v1.18.2
v1.18.1
v1.18.0
v1.17.4
v1.18.0-rc1
v1.19.0-dev
v1.18.0-rc0
v1.17.3
v1.17.2
v1.17.1
v1.17.0
v1.17.0-rc2
v1.16.9
v1.17.0-rc1
v1.18.0-dev
v1.16.8
v1.16.7
v1.16.6
v1.16.5
v1.16.4
v1.16.3
v1.16.2
v1.16.1
v1.16.0
v1.15.11
v1.17.0-dev
v1.16.0-rc1
v1.15.10
v1.15.9
v1.15.8
v1.15.7
v1.15.6
v1.15.5
v1.15.4
v1.15.3
v1.15.2
v1.15.1
v1.14.7
v1.15.0
v1.15.0-rc3
v1.14.6
v1.15.0-rc2
v1.14.5
v1.16.0-dev
v1.15.0-rc1
v1.14.4
v1.14.3
v1.14.2
v1.14.1
v1.14.0
v1.13.7
v1.14.0-rc2
v1.13.6
v1.13.5
v1.14.0-rc1
v1.15.0-dev
v1.13.4
v1.13.3
v1.13.2
v1.13.1
v1.13.0
v1.12.6
v1.13.0-rc2
v1.14.0-dev
v1.13.0-rc1
v1.12.5
v1.12.4
v1.12.3
v1.12.2
v1.12.1
v1.11.8
v1.12.0
v1.11.7
v1.12.0-rc2
v1.11.6
v1.12.0-rc1
v1.13.0-dev
v1.11.5
v1.11.4
v1.11.3
v1.10.6
v1.12.0-dev
v1.11.2
v1.10.5
v1.11.1
v1.10.4
v1.11.0
v1.11.0-rc2
v1.10.3
v1.11.0-rc1
v1.10.2
v1.10.1
v1.10.0
v1.9.6
v1.9.5
v1.10.0-rc2
v1.11.0-dev
v1.10.0-rc1
v1.9.4
v1.9.3
v1.9.2
v1.9.1
v1.9.0
v1.9.0-rc2
v1.10.0-dev
v1.9.0-rc1
v1.8.3
v1.8.2
v1.8.1
v1.8.0
v1.8.0-rc3
v1.7.6
v1.8.0-rc2
v1.7.5
v1.8.0-rc1
v1.9.0-dev
v1.7.4
v1.7.3
v1.7.2
v1.7.1
v1.7.0
v1.7.0-rc3
v1.6.4
v1.7.0-rc2
v1.6.3
v1.7.0-rc1
v1.7.0-dev
v1.6.2
v1.6.1
v1.6.0
v1.6.0-rc2
v1.5.3
v1.6.0-rc1
v1.6.0-dev
v1.5.2
v1.5.1
v1.5.0
v1.5.0-rc2
v1.5.0-rc1
v1.5.0-dev
v1.4.3
v1.4.2
v1.4.1
v1.4.0
v1.4.0-rc3
v1.4.0-rc2
v1.3.3
v1.4.0-rc1
v1.3.2
v1.3.1
v1.3.0
v1.3.0-rc2
v1.3.0-rc1
v1.2.3
v1.2.2
v1.2.1
v1.2.0
v1.2.0-rc3
v1.2.0-rc2
v1.1.4
v1.2.0-rc1
v1.1.3
v1.1.2
v1.1.1
v1.1.0
v1.0.2
v1.0.1
v1.0.0
v0.9.99
Labels
Clear labels
$20
$250
$50
$500
backport/done
💎 Bounty
docs-update-needed
good first issue
hacktoberfest
issue/bounty
issue/confirmed
issue/critical
issue/duplicate
issue/needs-feedback
issue/not-a-bug
issue/regression
issue/stale
issue/workaround
lgtm/need 2
modifies/api
modifies/translation
outdated/backport/v1.18
outdated/theme/markdown
outdated/theme/timetracker
performance/bigrepo
performance/cpu
performance/memory
performance/speed
pr/breaking
proposal/accepted
proposal/rejected
pr/wip
pull-request
reviewed/wontfix
💰 Rewarded
skip-changelog
status/blocked
topic/accessibility
topic/api
topic/authentication
topic/build
topic/code-linting
topic/commit-signing
topic/content-rendering
topic/deployment
topic/distribution
topic/federation
topic/gitea-actions
topic/issues
topic/lfs
topic/mobile
topic/moderation
topic/packages
topic/pr
topic/projects
topic/repo
topic/repo-migration
topic/security
topic/theme
topic/ui
topic/ui-interaction
topic/ux
topic/webhooks
topic/wiki
type/bug
type/deprecation
type/docs
type/enhancement
type/feature
type/miscellaneous
type/proposal
type/question
type/refactoring
type/summary
type/testing
type/upstream
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
No Label
type/bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
No Assignees
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: github-starred/gitea#4023
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @HarvsG on GitHub (Sep 27, 2019).
[x]):Description
Somewhere between gitea version 1.8.2 and
masterthe display of rendered html has changed in the repo view.both using the same render command: RENDER_COMMAND = "jupyter nbconvert --stdout --to html --template full "
In both cases
nbconvert==5.6.0In the latest version it passes the HTML as below with
class=jupyter, this results in unstyled HTMLHowever, previously it would pass
class=markdownwhich would maintain styling:Using the chrome inspector to edit the class from
jupytertomarkdownfixes this and returns styling.The culprit line appears to be line
c6fb7fe27c/routers/repo/view.go (L288)added 1 month ago in867f46f78e. This was a fix for #7868 (pull request #7869).A quick fix would be to change the above line to:
ctx.Data["MarkupType"] = markupType + " markdown"....
Screenshots
Current appearance in


master.Old appearance in v1.82 or after adding
class=markdowninmaster@HarvsG commented on GitHub (Sep 27, 2019):
The other possible solution would be to edit
867f46f78e/templates/repo/view_file.tmpl (L48)to:<div class="file-view {{if .IsMarkup}}{{.MarkupType}} markdown{{else if .IsRenderedHTML}}plain-text{{else if .IsTextFile}}code-view{{end}} has-emoji">However both of these solutions run the risk of creating
class=markdown markdownwhich is not very elegant.@HarvsG commented on GitHub (Sep 27, 2019):
Paging @noerw, would either of these mess with what you achieved in #7869 and #7868?
@lunny commented on GitHub (Sep 27, 2019):
@HarvsG Please send a PR.
@noerw commented on GitHub (Sep 28, 2019):
@HarvsG Hej, I was not aware that the
markdownCSS class would be needed for other types than.mdfiles. If thats the case, reusing this class for multiple formats seems kinda hacky and is hard to follow while reading the code. I changed the behaviour, so that custom styling for CSV files would be possible while making the gitea template more structured.If the old behaviour should be restored, I'd propose to introduce a new styling class for each markupType eg
html, and rename themarkdownclass to something more generic (external-render?).While more hacky, your quick fix would mostly preserve the current behaviour for CSV files (just larger margins around the table afaik).
@HarvsG commented on GitHub (Sep 28, 2019):
@noerw, Agreed. However the current
markdownclass does quite a good job of turning the plain HTML put out by by renderers such as pandoc and nbconvert into attractive formatting.Perhaps we could create a copy of the current
markdownclass called something likehtml,external-renderormarkupand instead pass that as the default in867f46f78e/templates/repo/view_file.tmpl (L48)E.g
<div class="file-view {{if .IsMarkup}}markup {{.MarkupType}}{{else if .IsRenderedHTML}}plain-text{{else if .IsTextFile}}code-view{{end}} has-emoji">markupwould have the elegant result of allowing users to write their own custom CSS in the format of.markup.asciidocor.markup.csvwhich is exactly the same format that the custom renderers are specified in app.inic6fb7fe27c/custom/conf/app.ini.sample (L797-L804)@noerw If you think this is a good idea, would you would be able to help me with the CSS changes as my CSS is weak, much less my 'less' skills.
@noerw commented on GitHub (Sep 30, 2019):
Your proposal sounds good, but refactoring this will need some elaborate manual testing (or is there a frontend test suite?).
So I'd revert the problematic change for now (so this affects only csv rendering in a minor way, I can send a PR this week), and do a proper refactor of the CSS classes as a second step.
@lunny commented on GitHub (Sep 30, 2019):
So let's sent two PRs. One for bug fix and another for a refactoring. :)
@HarvsG commented on GitHub (Oct 6, 2019):
@noerw, thank you for doing this in #8357, should we now explore the idea of the more general
markupclass and switching to this?@HarvsG commented on GitHub (Jul 16, 2020):
@noerw I have opened a PR to work on this: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/12261