[Branch View] [Bug] Restore Branch Button dont work #3646

Originally created by @6543 on GitHub (Jul 22, 2019).

The Restore Branch Button dont work on Firefox (Linux/68.0.1 x64)

testet on Gitea 1.10

Originally created by @6543 on GitHub (Jul 22, 2019). The Restore Branch Button dont work on Firefox (Linux/68.0.1 x64) testet on Gitea 1.10

GiteaMirror added the issue/confirmed type/bug labels 2025-11-02 05:20:25 -06:00

GiteaMirror closed this issue

GiteaMirror commented

@6543 commented on GitHub (Jul 27, 2019):

@lunny please add the kind/bug label so i can rename the issue name

@6543 commented on GitHub (Jul 27, 2019): @lunny please add the kind/bug label so i can rename the issue name

GiteaMirror commented

@6543 commented on GitHub (Jul 29, 2019):

http://localhost:3000/test/hometest/branches/restore?branch_id=22&name=merge-calcle produce page 404
is api brocken? (tested on firefox and chrome)

url was taken from "data-url" atribute of undo-button

@6543 commented on GitHub (Jul 29, 2019): http://localhost:3000/test/hometest/branches/restore?branch_id=22&name=merge-calcle produce page 404 is api brocken? (tested on firefox and chrome) url was taken from "data-url" atribute of undo-button

GiteaMirror commented

@techknowlogick commented on GitHub (Jul 29, 2019):

It may 404 for GET requests, I believe it only accepts POST

@techknowlogick commented on GitHub (Jul 29, 2019): It may 404 for GET requests, I believe it only accepts POST

GiteaMirror commented

@lunny commented on GitHub (Aug 1, 2019):

Cannot reproduce on macOS Chrome and Firefox.

@lunny commented on GitHub (Aug 1, 2019): Cannot reproduce on macOS Chrome and Firefox.

GiteaMirror commented

@6543 commented on GitHub (Aug 25, 2019):

I'll test it on Windows and two different Linux systems today ...

EDIT: two diff Windows too

@6543 commented on GitHub (Aug 25, 2019): I'll test it on Windows and two different Linux systems today ... EDIT: two diff Windows too

GiteaMirror commented

@6543 commented on GitHub (Aug 25, 2019):

Version: 1.10.0+dev-210-gc9546d4cd

System	Browser	Worked	Didn't
5.2.8-1-MANJARO	Chrome 76 (64-Bit)	x
5.2.8-1-MANJARO	Chromium 76 (64-Bit)	x
5.2.8-1-MANJARO	Falkon 3.1.0 (QtWebEngine 5.13.0)	x
5.2.8-1-MANJARO	Firefox 68.0.1 (64-Bit)		x
5.2.8-1-MANJARO	Firefox Developer Ed. 69.0b12 (64-Bit)		x
4.18.0-25-lowlatency Ubuntu Cosmic	Firefox 68.0 (64-Bit)		x
4.18.0-25-lowlatency Ubuntu Cosmic	Chrome73 (64-Bit)	x
Windows 8.1 Pro	Firefox 62.0.3 (64-Bit)	x
Windows 8.1 Pro	Firefox 68.0.2 (64-Bit)	x
Windows 10 Pro N	Firefox 67.0.2 (64-Bit)		x
Windows 10 Pro N	Firefox 68.0.2 (64-Bit)	x
Windows 10 Pro N	Edge 42	x
Android 9	Fennec F-Droid 68.0		x
Android 9	Tor Browser 60.8.0		x
Android 9	Lightning 4.5.1	x

@6543 commented on GitHub (Aug 25, 2019): Version: 1.10.0+dev-210-gc9546d4cd System | Browser | Worked | Didn't ----------- | ------------ | ----------- | -------- 5.2.8-1-MANJARO | Chrome 76 (64-Bit) | x | 5.2.8-1-MANJARO | Chromium 76 (64-Bit) | x | 5.2.8-1-MANJARO | Falkon 3.1.0 (QtWebEngine 5.13.0) | x | 5.2.8-1-MANJARO | Firefox 68.0.1 (64-Bit) | | x 5.2.8-1-MANJARO | Firefox Developer Ed. 69.0b12 (64-Bit) | | x 4.18.0-25-lowlatency Ubuntu Cosmic | Firefox 68.0 (64-Bit) | | x 4.18.0-25-lowlatency Ubuntu Cosmic | Chrome73 (64-Bit) |x| Windows 8.1 Pro | Firefox 62.0.3 (64-Bit) |x| Windows 8.1 Pro | Firefox 68.0.2 (64-Bit) |x| Windows 10 Pro N | Firefox 67.0.2 (64-Bit) | |x Windows 10 Pro N | Firefox 68.0.2 (64-Bit) | x | Windows 10 Pro N | Edge 42 | x | Android 9 | Fennec F-Droid 68.0 | | x Android 9 | Tor Browser 60.8.0 | | x Android 9 | Lightning 4.5.1 | x |

GiteaMirror commented

@6543 commented on GitHub (Aug 25, 2019):

so only Firefox Linux versions and one Windows Firefox combi has problems with this :(

-> cant test Max OSX so if somebody can do this ...

EDIT: @lunny can you add detailed information of your OSX test?

@6543 commented on GitHub (Aug 25, 2019): so only Firefox Linux versions and one Windows Firefox combi has problems with this :( -> cant test Max OSX so if somebody can do this ... EDIT: @lunny can you add detailed information of your OSX test?

GiteaMirror commented

@6543 commented on GitHub (Aug 28, 2019):

it realy looks like Linux + Firefox dont open the link as POST but as GET request!

@6543 commented on GitHub (Aug 28, 2019): it realy looks like Linux + Firefox dont open the link as POST but as GET request!

GiteaMirror commented

@lunny commented on GitHub (Aug 28, 2019):

System	Browser	Worked
macOS 10.14.5	Chrome 76 (64-Bit)	x
macOS 10.14.5	Firefox 68 (64-Bit)	x
macOS 10.14.5	Safari 12.1.1 (64-Bit)	x

@lunny commented on GitHub (Aug 28, 2019): System | Browser | Worked | Didn't ----------- | ------------ | ----------- | -------- macOS 10.14.5 | Chrome 76 (64-Bit) | x | macOS 10.14.5 | Firefox 68 (64-Bit) | x | macOS 10.14.5 | Safari 12.1.1 (64-Bit) | x |

GiteaMirror commented

@6543 commented on GitHub (Oct 6, 2019):

tested with current version 8a828500e6

System: Linux 5.2 | Manjaro | Firefox 69.0.1 (64-Bit)

result: still exist

@6543 commented on GitHub (Oct 6, 2019): tested with current version https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/commit/8a828500e689b7958e050ebd2dc46d380c3d6ae6 System: Linux 5.2 | Manjaro | Firefox 69.0.1 (64-Bit) result: still exist

GiteaMirror commented

@stale[bot] commented on GitHub (Dec 5, 2019):

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs during the next 2 weeks. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale[bot] commented on GitHub (Dec 5, 2019): This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs during the next 2 weeks. Thank you for your contributions.

GiteaMirror commented

@6543 commented on GitHub (Dec 5, 2019):

tested with e80fe201c0 still exist :(

@6543 commented on GitHub (Dec 5, 2019): tested with e80fe201c0e7b1f7a73aa932d4a02068e044f0ce still exist :(

GiteaMirror commented