Archiving a repo should not make it new #3145

Closed
opened 2025-11-02 05:01:57 -06:00 by GiteaMirror · 2 comments
Owner

Originally created by @Oreolek on GitHub (Apr 6, 2019).

When I'm archiving a 10 year old repository it should not make it new. It should not jump to the first page in the project list. Thank you.

Originally created by @Oreolek on GitHub (Apr 6, 2019). When I'm archiving a 10 year old repository it should not make it new. It should not jump to the first page in the project list. Thank you.
GiteaMirror added the type/proposal label 2025-11-02 05:01:57 -06:00
Author
Owner

@lunny commented on GitHub (Apr 11, 2019):

We have to update the repository on database with x.NoAutoTime().Cols().Update() to avoid fill updated column.

@lunny commented on GitHub (Apr 11, 2019): We have to update the repository on database with `x.NoAutoTime().Cols().Update()` to avoid fill `updated` column.
Author
Owner

@mrsdizzie commented on GitHub (Sep 7, 2020):

Fixed in #12266

@mrsdizzie commented on GitHub (Sep 7, 2020): Fixed in #12266
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/gitea#3145