not work correct search ip-address in <code> #2767

New Issue

GiteaMirror · 2025-11-02T04:47:43-06:00

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-02 04:47:43 -06:00

Originally created by @vorlon001 on GitHub (Jan 17, 2019).

Gitea version (or commit ref): 176a604
Git version:
Operating system: Docker https://hub.docker.com/r/gitea/gitea/
Database (use [x]):
- PostgreSQL
- MySQL
- MSSQL
- SQLite
Can you reproduce the bug at https://try.gitea.io:
- Yes (provide example URL)
- No
- Not relevant
Log gist:

Description

on https://try.gitea.io not work search code....

for string not work search and indexer
example 1)
...
interface gi1/0
{space}{space}{space}ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
!

interface gi1/0
ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
!

...
example 2)
...
10.0.0.2
{space}{space}10.0.0.3

...

example 1): not search 10.0.0.1 or gi1/0 in document repo
example 1): not search 10.0.0.3. search only 10.0.0.2 in document repo

Screenshots

Originally created by @vorlon001 on GitHub (Jan 17, 2019).  - Gitea version (or commit ref): 176a604 - Git version: - Operating system: Docker https://hub.docker.com/r/gitea/gitea/ - Database (use `[x]`): - [ ] PostgreSQL - [x] MySQL - [ ] MSSQL - [ ] SQLite - Can you reproduce the bug at https://try.gitea.io: - [ ] Yes (provide example URL) - [x] No - [ ] Not relevant - Log gist: ## Description on https://try.gitea.io not work search code.... for string not work search and indexer example 1) ... interface gi1/0 {space}{space}{space}ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0 ! interface gi1/0 ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0 ! ... example 2) ... 10.0.0.2 {space}{space}10.0.0.3 ... example 1): not search 10.0.0.1 or gi1/0 in document repo example 1): not search 10.0.0.3. search only 10.0.0.2 in document repo ## Screenshots

GiteaMirror added the issue/confirmed type/enhancement labels 2025-11-02 04:47:43 -06:00

GiteaMirror closed this issue

2025-11-02 04:47:43 -06:00

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-02 04:47:44 -06:00

@vorlon001 commented on GitHub (Jan 18, 2019):

update

@vorlon001 commented on GitHub (Jan 18, 2019): update

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-02 04:47:46 -06:00

@stale[bot] commented on GitHub (Mar 22, 2019):

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs during the next 2 weeks. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale[bot] commented on GitHub (Mar 22, 2019): This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs during the next 2 weeks. Thank you for your contributions.

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-02 04:47:46 -06:00

@vorlon001 commented on GitHub (Mar 22, 2019):

problem not fix.
search ip in gitea no work.

@vorlon001 commented on GitHub (Mar 22, 2019): problem not fix. search ip in gitea no work.

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-02 04:47:46 -06:00

@vorlon001 commented on GitHub (Mar 22, 2019):

this is a bug

@vorlon001 commented on GitHub (Mar 22, 2019): this is a bug

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-02 04:47:47 -06:00

@vorlon001 commented on GitHub (Mar 22, 2019):

"This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs during the next 2 weeks. Thank you for your contributions." - problem not fix.
solutions developed not given.
no reason to close.
search does not work is a mistake.

@vorlon001 commented on GitHub (Mar 22, 2019): "This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs during the next 2 weeks. Thank you for your contributions." - problem not fix. solutions developed not given. no reason to close. search does not work is a mistake.

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-02 04:47:47 -06:00

@vorlon001 commented on GitHub (Apr 11, 2019):

found another solution

@vorlon001 commented on GitHub (Apr 11, 2019): found another solution

GiteaMirror referenced this issue

2025-11-02 12:13:54 -06:00

[PR #2767] [MERGED] Use identicon image for default gravatar. #16579

Sign in to join this conversation.