Show number of commits ahead/behind in branch overview #2704

New Issue

GiteaMirror · 2025-11-02T04:45:05-06:00

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-02 04:45:05 -06:00

Originally created by @vijfhoek on GitHub (Jan 4, 2019).

Like #5326, but in the branch overview, like this:

This would be massively useful for deleting old branches, to check if they happen to have commits that aren't merged to develop yet (so you can't accidentally delete work).

Originally created by @vijfhoek on GitHub (Jan 4, 2019). Like #5326, but in the branch overview, like this: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/345785/50683452-674bfe00-1012-11e9-9858-bb2a1d2d9322.png) This would be massively useful for deleting old branches, to check if they happen to have commits that aren't merged to develop yet (so you can't accidentally delete work).

GiteaMirror added the issue/confirmed type/enhancement labels 2025-11-02 04:45:05 -06:00

GiteaMirror closed this issue

2025-11-02 04:45:05 -06:00

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-02 04:45:05 -06:00

@stale[bot] commented on GitHub (Mar 5, 2019):

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs during the next 2 weeks. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale[bot] commented on GitHub (Mar 5, 2019): This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs during the next 2 weeks. Thank you for your contributions.

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-02 04:45:06 -06:00

@vijfhoek commented on GitHub (Mar 10, 2019):

Do we want to close this issue? Seems to me that feature requests like these should not be marked stale and be closed after a few months.

@vijfhoek commented on GitHub (Mar 10, 2019): Do we want to close this issue? Seems to me that feature requests like these should not be marked stale and be closed after a few months.

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-02 04:45:06 -06:00

@morph027 commented on GitHub (Apr 17, 2019):

Stumbled into the same use case yesterday (after finally switching to wonderful gitea). It would be nice. Discussion here or in #5326 ?

@morph027 commented on GitHub (Apr 17, 2019): Stumbled into the same use case yesterday (after finally switching to wonderful gitea). It would be nice. Discussion here or in #5326 ?

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-02 04:45:06 -06:00

@saitho commented on GitHub (Apr 20, 2019):

I'll try to implement this feature.

@saitho commented on GitHub (Apr 20, 2019): I'll try to implement this feature.

GiteaMirror referenced this issue

2025-11-02 12:13:08 -06:00

[PR #2704] [MERGED] Integration test for activity page #16546

Sign in to join this conversation.