Allow edits from maintainers in PR #264

Closed
opened 2025-11-02 03:16:29 -06:00 by GiteaMirror · 3 comments
Owner

Originally created by @rugk on GitHub (Jan 22, 2017).

It would be nice to introduce the same feature that GitHub now has:
prallowedits

As far as I understand it this allows maintainers of the main repo, where you submit a PR to, to push to your PR. So they can now improve your PR without having to wait that the creator of the PR fixes the issues.


upstream issue: https://github.com/gogits/gogs/issues/3762


Want to back this issue? Post a bounty on it! We accept bounties via Bountysource.

Originally created by @rugk on GitHub (Jan 22, 2017). It would be nice to introduce the same feature that GitHub now has: ![prallowedits](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/11966684/19346855/def2cd6a-9145-11e6-9a5b-752adcc28494.png) As far as I understand it this allows maintainers of the main repo, where you submit a PR to, to push to your PR. So they can now improve your PR without having to wait that the creator of the PR fixes the issues. --- upstream issue: https://github.com/gogits/gogs/issues/3762 <bountysource-plugin> --- Want to back this issue? **[Post a bounty on it!](https://www.bountysource.com/issues/41209468-allow-edits-from-maintainers-in-pr?utm_campaign=plugin&utm_content=tracker%2F47456670&utm_medium=issues&utm_source=github)** We accept bounties via [Bountysource](https://www.bountysource.com/?utm_campaign=plugin&utm_content=tracker%2F47456670&utm_medium=issues&utm_source=github). </bountysource-plugin>
GiteaMirror added the type/featureissue/confirmed labels 2025-11-02 03:16:29 -06:00
Author
Owner

@bkcsoft commented on GitHub (Feb 12, 2017):

This might be a bit hard at the moment, since we now only map HasAccess(user, repo) and not HasAccess(user, repo, branch)... And we would have to check which branches are being pushed, which might lead to security issues 🙁

@bkcsoft commented on GitHub (Feb 12, 2017): This might be a bit hard at the moment, since we now only map `HasAccess(user, repo)` and not `HasAccess(user, repo, branch)`... And we would have to check which branches are being pushed, which might lead to security issues 🙁
Author
Owner

@stale[bot] commented on GitHub (Feb 17, 2019):

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs during the next 2 weeks. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale[bot] commented on GitHub (Feb 17, 2019): This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs during the next 2 weeks. Thank you for your contributions.
Author
Owner

@wxiaoguang commented on GitHub (Apr 29, 2022):

@wxiaoguang commented on GitHub (Apr 29, 2022): * https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/18002
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/gitea#264