github-starred/gitea
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea.git synced 2026-03-12 02:24:21 -05:00
Code Issues 2.6k Packages Projects Releases 100 Wiki Activity

Repository owned by group, not organisation #1915

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-11-02 04:17:44 -06:00 by GiteaMirror · 2 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 04:17:44 -06:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @belliash on GitHub (Jun 10, 2018).

Please implement the ability to create a repositories owned by a group within the organisation. Actually only personal or owned by organisation repositories can be created. They are accessible by: organisation/repo_name. This has a major disadvantage. An organisation that is working on few projects cannot create two repositories for two different project with the same name and/or group repos by group.

With this issue implemented, I imagine that repositories could be accessed by organisation/group/repo_name. Thus Same organisation would be able to create several projects and repos under it w/o the need to prefix repo name with project name.

Originally created by @belliash on GitHub (Jun 10, 2018). Please implement the ability to create a repositories owned by a group within the organisation. Actually only personal or owned by organisation repositories can be created. They are accessible by: organisation/repo_name. This has a major disadvantage. An organisation that is working on few projects cannot create two repositories for two different project with the same name and/or group repos by group. With this issue implemented, I imagine that repositories could be accessed by organisation/group/repo_name. Thus Same organisation would be able to create several projects and repos under it w/o the need to prefix repo name with project name.
GiteaMirror added the issue/duplicate label 2025-11-02 04:17:44 -06:00
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 04:17:44 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@lunny commented on GitHub (Jun 11, 2018):

I thinks this is duplicated with #3840

@lunny commented on GitHub (Jun 11, 2018): I thinks this is duplicated with #3840
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 04:17:45 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@belliash commented on GitHub (Jun 11, 2018):

Yep, sounds similar.
Any chance to get this implemented? 👍

@belliash commented on GitHub (Jun 11, 2018): Yep, sounds similar. Any chance to get this implemented? :+1:
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
$20
$250
$50
$500
backport/done
💎 Bounty
docs-update-needed
good first issue
hacktoberfest
issue/bounty
issue/confirmed
issue/critical
issue/duplicate
issue/needs-feedback
issue/not-a-bug
issue/regression
issue/stale
issue/workaround
lgtm/need 2
modifies/api
modifies/translation
outdated/backport/v1.18
outdated/theme/markdown
outdated/theme/timetracker
performance/bigrepo
performance/cpu
performance/memory
performance/speed
pr/breaking
proposal/accepted
proposal/rejected
pr/wip
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 reviewed/wontfix
💰 Rewarded
skip-changelog
status/blocked
topic/accessibility
topic/api
topic/authentication
topic/build
topic/code-linting
topic/commit-signing
topic/content-rendering
topic/deployment
topic/distribution
topic/federation
topic/gitea-actions
topic/issues
topic/lfs
topic/mobile
topic/moderation
topic/packages
topic/pr
topic/projects
topic/repo
topic/repo-migration
topic/security
topic/theme
topic/ui
topic/ui-interaction
topic/ux
topic/webhooks
topic/wiki
type/bug
type/deprecation
type/docs
type/enhancement
type/feature
type/miscellaneous
type/proposal
type/question
type/refactoring
type/summary
type/testing
type/upstream
No Label issue/duplicate
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/gitea#1915
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?