github-starred/gitea
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea.git synced 2026-03-09 04:25:18 -05:00
Code Issues 2.6k Packages Projects Releases 100 Wiki Activity

Have to reauthorize OAuth on every login for public clients #14217

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-11-02 11:06:43 -06:00 by GiteaMirror · 2 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 11:06:43 -06:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @jimafisk on GitHub (Mar 4, 2025).

Description

There was an update to the OAuth workflow that requires public clients to click "Authorize Application" every time they login: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/25061

In reading the referenced spec (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8252#section-8.6) I noticed it says:

Measures such as claimed "https" scheme redirects MAY be accepted by authorization servers as identity proof.

I assume that means you shouldn't have to do this if using SSL/TLS in your redirect URI? It would be nice to not force our users to re-authorize every time they login. Thanks!

Gitea Version

1.23.3

Can you reproduce the bug on the Gitea demo site?

No

Log Gist

No response

Screenshots

Image

Git Version

No response

Operating System

No response

How are you running Gitea?

I'm using a binary from the official releases, run with systemd (no docker).

Database

SQLite

Originally created by @jimafisk on GitHub (Mar 4, 2025). ### Description There was an update to the OAuth workflow that requires public clients to click "Authorize Application" every time they login: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/25061 In reading the referenced spec (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8252#section-8.6) I noticed it says: > Measures such as claimed "https" scheme redirects MAY be accepted by authorization servers as identity proof. I assume that means you shouldn't have to do this if using SSL/TLS in your redirect URI? It would be nice to not force our users to re-authorize every time they login. Thanks! ### Gitea Version 1.23.3 ### Can you reproduce the bug on the Gitea demo site? No ### Log Gist _No response_ ### Screenshots ![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a128ca23-c7e0-40be-8331-49cd7018f0e8) ### Git Version _No response_ ### Operating System _No response_ ### How are you running Gitea? I'm using a binary from the official releases, run with systemd (no docker). ### Database SQLite
GiteaMirror added the type/bug label 2025-11-02 11:06:43 -06:00
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 11:06:44 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@wxiaoguang commented on GitHub (Mar 4, 2025):

Have you tried this option?

Image

@wxiaoguang commented on GitHub (Mar 4, 2025): Have you tried this option? ![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e458694c-9552-41e3-b956-dfbd3296d2b2)
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 11:06:44 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jimafisk commented on GitHub (Mar 4, 2025):

Oh jeeze, sorry I missed that! This is exactly what I wanted @wxiaoguang. I just tested and it works perfectly 👌 . Thank you!!

@jimafisk commented on GitHub (Mar 4, 2025): Oh jeeze, sorry I missed that! This is exactly what I wanted @wxiaoguang. I just tested and it works perfectly 👌 . Thank you!!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
$20
$250
$50
$500
backport/done
💎 Bounty
docs-update-needed
good first issue
hacktoberfest
issue/bounty
issue/confirmed
issue/critical
issue/duplicate
issue/needs-feedback
issue/not-a-bug
issue/regression
issue/stale
issue/workaround
lgtm/need 2
modifies/api
modifies/translation
outdated/backport/v1.18
outdated/theme/markdown
outdated/theme/timetracker
performance/bigrepo
performance/cpu
performance/memory
performance/speed
pr/breaking
proposal/accepted
proposal/rejected
pr/wip
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 reviewed/wontfix
💰 Rewarded
skip-changelog
status/blocked
topic/accessibility
topic/api
topic/authentication
topic/build
topic/code-linting
topic/commit-signing
topic/content-rendering
topic/deployment
topic/distribution
topic/federation
topic/gitea-actions
topic/issues
topic/lfs
topic/mobile
topic/moderation
topic/packages
topic/pr
topic/projects
topic/repo
topic/repo-migration
topic/security
topic/theme
topic/ui
topic/ui-interaction
topic/ux
topic/webhooks
topic/wiki
type/bug
type/deprecation
type/docs
type/enhancement
type/feature
type/miscellaneous
type/proposal
type/question
type/refactoring
type/summary
type/testing
type/upstream
No Label type/bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/gitea#14217
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?