github-starred/gitea
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea.git synced 2026-03-10 22:06:34 -05:00
Code Issues 2.6k Packages Projects Releases 100 Wiki Activity

Code search exact makes not exact search #14186

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-11-02 11:05:40 -06:00 by GiteaMirror · 6 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 11:05:40 -06:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @gomanuke on GitHub (Feb 25, 2025).

Description

Here You are a file that returns by "GetPrev" search string.
IMHO exact searching must not return it.

prompt --application/shared_components/user_interface/shortcuts/ok_to_get_next_prev_pk_value begin -- Manifest -- SHORTCUT: OK_TO_GET_NEXT_PREV_PK_VALUE -- Manifest End wwv_flow_imp.component_begin ( p_version_yyyy_mm_dd=>'2024.05.31' ,p_release=>'24.1.7' ,p_default_workspace_id=>1202104075024633 ,p_default_application_id=>401 ,p_default_id_offset=>8704503425691951 ,p_default_owner=>'OBLAKO_PRINT' ); wwv_flow_imp_shared.create_shortcut( p_id=>wwv_flow_imp.id(26669283042465176847) ,p_shortcut_name=>'OK_TO_GET_NEXT_PREV_PK_VALUE' ,p_shortcut_type=>'TEXT_ESCAPE_JS' ,p_version_scn=>1 ,p_shortcut=>'Are you sure you want to leave this page without saving?' ); wwv_flow_imp.component_end; end; /

Gitea Version

1.23.4

Can you reproduce the bug on the Gitea demo site?

No

Log Gist

No response

Screenshots

No response

Git Version

No response

Operating System

Debian 12

How are you running Gitea?

systemctl daemon

Database

MySQL/MariaDB

Originally created by @gomanuke on GitHub (Feb 25, 2025). ### Description Here You are a file that returns by "GetPrev" search string. IMHO exact searching must not return it. `prompt --application/shared_components/user_interface/shortcuts/ok_to_get_next_prev_pk_value begin -- Manifest -- SHORTCUT: OK_TO_GET_NEXT_PREV_PK_VALUE -- Manifest End wwv_flow_imp.component_begin ( p_version_yyyy_mm_dd=>'2024.05.31' ,p_release=>'24.1.7' ,p_default_workspace_id=>1202104075024633 ,p_default_application_id=>401 ,p_default_id_offset=>8704503425691951 ,p_default_owner=>'OBLAKO_PRINT' ); wwv_flow_imp_shared.create_shortcut( p_id=>wwv_flow_imp.id(26669283042465176847) ,p_shortcut_name=>'OK_TO_GET_NEXT_PREV_PK_VALUE' ,p_shortcut_type=>'TEXT_ESCAPE_JS' ,p_version_scn=>1 ,p_shortcut=>'Are you sure you want to leave this page without saving?' ); wwv_flow_imp.component_end; end; / ` ### Gitea Version 1.23.4 ### Can you reproduce the bug on the Gitea demo site? No ### Log Gist _No response_ ### Screenshots _No response_ ### Git Version _No response_ ### Operating System Debian 12 ### How are you running Gitea? systemctl daemon ### Database MySQL/MariaDB
GiteaMirror added the type/bug label 2025-11-02 11:05:40 -06:00
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 11:05:41 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@wxiaoguang commented on GitHub (Feb 25, 2025):

@6543 need to remove the "fuzzy"?

@wxiaoguang commented on GitHub (Feb 25, 2025): @6543 need to remove the "fuzzy"?
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 11:05:42 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@gomanuke commented on GitHub (Feb 25, 2025):

Exact is by default:

Image

@gomanuke commented on GitHub (Feb 25, 2025): Exact is by default: ![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/08c8947d-4239-4b4e-acd2-f3af7fb4bc94)
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 11:05:42 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jpraet commented on GitHub (Feb 25, 2025):

Possibly resolved by #33628 which restores the search mode for bleve from MatchQuery back to MatchPhraseQuery, as it was in 1.22.

On the main branch though, it is still using MatchQuery, but with #33590 a "literal search mode" was added (by using quotes).

@jpraet commented on GitHub (Feb 25, 2025): Possibly resolved by #33628 which restores the search mode for bleve from MatchQuery back to MatchPhraseQuery, as it was in 1.22. On the main branch though, it is still using MatchQuery, but with #33590 a "literal search mode" was added (by using quotes).
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 11:05:42 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@gomanuke commented on GitHub (Feb 26, 2025):

Appreciate You for explanation. Using quotes is definitely solution.
Would You clarify about release practice: when we can get binary with #33590 ?

@gomanuke commented on GitHub (Feb 26, 2025): Appreciate You for explanation. Using quotes is definitely solution. Would You clarify about release practice: when we can get binary with #33590 ?
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 11:05:42 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@lunny commented on GitHub (Feb 26, 2025):

#33628 will be released in v1.23.5 and #33590 will be released in v1.24.0 .

@lunny commented on GitHub (Feb 26, 2025): #33628 will be released in v1.23.5 and #33590 will be released in v1.24.0 .
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 11:05:42 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@lunny commented on GitHub (Feb 26, 2025):

I think we can close this at the moment since two PRs are merged.

@lunny commented on GitHub (Feb 26, 2025): I think we can close this at the moment since two PRs are merged.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
$20
$250
$50
$500
backport/done
💎 Bounty
docs-update-needed
good first issue
hacktoberfest
issue/bounty
issue/confirmed
issue/critical
issue/duplicate
issue/needs-feedback
issue/not-a-bug
issue/regression
issue/stale
issue/workaround
lgtm/need 2
modifies/api
modifies/translation
outdated/backport/v1.18
outdated/theme/markdown
outdated/theme/timetracker
performance/bigrepo
performance/cpu
performance/memory
performance/speed
pr/breaking
proposal/accepted
proposal/rejected
pr/wip
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 reviewed/wontfix
💰 Rewarded
skip-changelog
status/blocked
topic/accessibility
topic/api
topic/authentication
topic/build
topic/code-linting
topic/commit-signing
topic/content-rendering
topic/deployment
topic/distribution
topic/federation
topic/gitea-actions
topic/issues
topic/lfs
topic/mobile
topic/moderation
topic/packages
topic/pr
topic/projects
topic/repo
topic/repo-migration
topic/security
topic/theme
topic/ui
topic/ui-interaction
topic/ux
topic/webhooks
topic/wiki
type/bug
type/deprecation
type/docs
type/enhancement
type/feature
type/miscellaneous
type/proposal
type/question
type/refactoring
type/summary
type/testing
type/upstream
No Label type/bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/gitea#14186
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?