github-starred/gitea
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea.git synced 2026-03-22 14:34:54 -05:00
Code Issues 2.6k Packages Projects Releases 100 Wiki Activity

Support libsql #12576

New Issue
Open
opened 2025-11-02 10:14:40 -06:00 by GiteaMirror · 8 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 10:14:40 -06:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @rawkode on GitHub (Mar 2, 2024).

Feature Description

I for love to see the SQLite driver swapped out for libsql, allowing us to use a highly available sqlite database.

This should be close to a drop in replacement.

Screenshots

No response

Originally created by @rawkode on GitHub (Mar 2, 2024). ### Feature Description I for love to see the SQLite driver swapped out for libsql, allowing us to use a highly available sqlite database. This should be close to a drop in replacement. ### Screenshots _No response_
GiteaMirror added the type/proposal label 2025-11-02 10:14:40 -06:00
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 10:14:41 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@delvh commented on GitHub (Mar 2, 2024):

Sounds good to me.
Only the

To get started with the libSQL API:
Go (experimental)

is a bit concerning to me

@delvh commented on GitHub (Mar 2, 2024): Sounds good to me. Only the > To get started with the libSQL API: [Go](https://github.com/tursodatabase/libsql/blob/main/bindings/go) (experimental) is a bit concerning to me
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 10:14:41 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@lunny commented on GitHub (Mar 2, 2024):

Sorry, maybe we need some investigate whether libsql is mature enough.

@lunny commented on GitHub (Mar 2, 2024): Sorry, maybe we need some investigate whether libsql is mature enough.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 10:14:41 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@delvh commented on GitHub (Mar 2, 2024):

I mean, according to their docs, they are a fork of SQLite.
In other words, they are as mature as SQLite.

@delvh commented on GitHub (Mar 2, 2024): I mean, according to their docs, they are a fork of SQLite. In other words, they are as mature as SQLite.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 10:14:41 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@silverwind commented on GitHub (Mar 2, 2024):

Does this Go binding require CGO? We've been looking for a native sqlite driver.

@silverwind commented on GitHub (Mar 2, 2024): Does this Go binding require CGO? We've been looking for a native sqlite driver.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 10:14:42 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@delvh commented on GitHub (Mar 2, 2024):

Probably

@delvh commented on GitHub (Mar 2, 2024): Probably
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 10:14:42 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@techknowlogick commented on GitHub (Mar 2, 2024):

Yes, it does require CGO. I've just thrown up an experimental branch

@techknowlogick commented on GitHub (Mar 2, 2024): Yes, it does require CGO. I've just thrown up an experimental branch
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 10:14:42 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@rawkode commented on GitHub (Mar 2, 2024):

There's a client which I don't believe needs CGO

https://github.com/tursodatabase/libsql-client-go

@rawkode commented on GitHub (Mar 2, 2024): There's a client which I don't believe needs CGO https://github.com/tursodatabase/libsql-client-go
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 10:14:42 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@rawkode commented on GitHub (Mar 2, 2024):

However, I believe that will only support libsql and not SQLite

@rawkode commented on GitHub (Mar 2, 2024): However, I believe that will only support libsql and not SQLite
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
$20
$250
$50
$500
backport/done
💎 Bounty
docs-update-needed
good first issue
hacktoberfest
issue/bounty
issue/confirmed
issue/critical
issue/duplicate
issue/needs-feedback
issue/not-a-bug
issue/regression
issue/stale
issue/workaround
lgtm/need 2
modifies/api
modifies/translation
outdated/backport/v1.18
outdated/theme/markdown
outdated/theme/timetracker
performance/bigrepo
performance/cpu
performance/memory
performance/speed
pr/breaking
proposal/accepted
proposal/rejected
pr/wip
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 reviewed/wontfix
💰 Rewarded
skip-changelog
status/blocked
topic/accessibility
topic/api
topic/authentication
topic/build
topic/code-linting
topic/commit-signing
topic/content-rendering
topic/deployment
topic/distribution
topic/federation
topic/gitea-actions
topic/issues
topic/lfs
topic/mobile
topic/moderation
topic/packages
topic/pr
topic/projects
topic/repo
topic/repo-migration
topic/security
topic/theme
topic/ui
topic/ui-interaction
topic/ux
topic/webhooks
topic/wiki
type/bug
type/deprecation
type/docs
type/enhancement
type/feature
type/miscellaneous
type/proposal
type/question
type/refactoring
type/summary
type/testing
type/upstream
No Label type/proposal
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/gitea#12576
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?