github-starred/gitea
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea.git synced 2026-03-22 06:24:14 -05:00
Code Issues 2.6k Packages Projects Releases 100 Wiki Activity

OAuth2 and ReverseProxy behavior is different when using email as user #11489

New Issue
Open
opened 2025-11-02 09:39:11 -06:00 by GiteaMirror · 0 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 09:39:11 -06:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @maordavidov on GitHub (Aug 21, 2023).

Description

When using oauth2_client configuraiton, there is an option to use email in the USERNAME field.
The implementation uses Split functionality like speficied here

While using ReverseProxy, I'm unable to use security.REVERSE_PROXY_AUTHENTICATION_USER = X-Auth-Request-Email the reason is it fails on the field validation and returns nil user (actually, the user looks like he is not connected) I think the relevant implementation is here

The users I'm receiving has a long user id name and I guess it's not the desired behavior.

Gitea Version

1.20.2

Can you reproduce the bug on the Gitea demo site?

No

Log Gist

No response

Screenshots

image

Git Version

No response

Operating System

No response

How are you running Gitea?

Helm chart, in Kubernetes

Database

SQLite

Originally created by @maordavidov on GitHub (Aug 21, 2023). ### Description When using `oauth2_client` configuraiton, there is an option to use `email` in the `USERNAME` field. The implementation uses Split functionality like speficied [here](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/main/routers/web/auth/auth.go#L359) While using ReverseProxy, I'm unable to use `security.REVERSE_PROXY_AUTHENTICATION_USER = X-Auth-Request-Email` the reason is it fails on the field validation and returns nil user (actually, the user looks like he is not connected) I think the relevant implementation is [here](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/main/services/auth/reverseproxy.go#L38) The users I'm receiving has a long user id name and I guess it's not the desired behavior. ### Gitea Version 1.20.2 ### Can you reproduce the bug on the Gitea demo site? No ### Log Gist _No response_ ### Screenshots ![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/14234032/01ad575d-f8dc-4d17-8f5d-f4ce223f1768) ### Git Version _No response_ ### Operating System _No response_ ### How are you running Gitea? Helm chart, in Kubernetes ### Database SQLite
GiteaMirror added the type/bug label 2025-11-02 09:39:11 -06:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
$20
$250
$50
$500
backport/done
💎 Bounty
docs-update-needed
good first issue
hacktoberfest
issue/bounty
issue/confirmed
issue/critical
issue/duplicate
issue/needs-feedback
issue/not-a-bug
issue/regression
issue/stale
issue/workaround
lgtm/need 2
modifies/api
modifies/translation
outdated/backport/v1.18
outdated/theme/markdown
outdated/theme/timetracker
performance/bigrepo
performance/cpu
performance/memory
performance/speed
pr/breaking
proposal/accepted
proposal/rejected
pr/wip
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 reviewed/wontfix
💰 Rewarded
skip-changelog
status/blocked
topic/accessibility
topic/api
topic/authentication
topic/build
topic/code-linting
topic/commit-signing
topic/content-rendering
topic/deployment
topic/distribution
topic/federation
topic/gitea-actions
topic/issues
topic/lfs
topic/mobile
topic/moderation
topic/packages
topic/pr
topic/projects
topic/repo
topic/repo-migration
topic/security
topic/theme
topic/ui
topic/ui-interaction
topic/ux
topic/webhooks
topic/wiki
type/bug
type/deprecation
type/docs
type/enhancement
type/feature
type/miscellaneous
type/proposal
type/question
type/refactoring
type/summary
type/testing
type/upstream
No Label type/bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/gitea#11489
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?