github-starred/gitea
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea.git synced 2026-03-12 02:24:21 -05:00
Code Issues 2.6k Packages Projects Releases 100 Wiki Activity

Not readable style #11253

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-11-02 09:32:18 -06:00 by GiteaMirror · 19 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 09:32:18 -06:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @somera on GitHub (Jul 17, 2023).

Originally assigned to: @denyskon on GitHub.

Description

The new style is so compact, that the table is not readable.

I would say, that the ID column is not needed.

Screenshots

image

image

Gitea Version

1.20.0

Can you reproduce the bug on the Gitea demo site?

No

Operating System

Ubuntu 20.04.4

Browser Version

Chrome

Originally created by @somera on GitHub (Jul 17, 2023). Originally assigned to: @denyskon on GitHub. ### Description The new style is so compact, that the table is not readable. I would say, that the ID column is not needed. ### Screenshots ![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/8334250/ed55d949-c91a-4a47-93ee-26cc8c041c6d) ![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/8334250/a9845b12-124d-419d-8f5d-a1f16e401eff) ### Gitea Version 1.20.0 ### Can you reproduce the bug on the Gitea demo site? No ### Operating System Ubuntu 20.04.4 ### Browser Version Chrome
GiteaMirror added the topic/uitype/bug labels 2025-11-02 09:32:18 -06:00
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 09:32:19 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@somera commented on GitHub (Jul 17, 2023):

This ist the old style.
image
You can read the content in the table better.

@somera commented on GitHub (Jul 17, 2023): This ist the old style. ![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/8334250/b6ac8f50-f909-4763-9c3f-6243d4b4b18f) You can read the content in the table better.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 09:32:19 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@KazzmanK commented on GitHub (Jul 17, 2023):

For such a request it may be sufficient to make left pane be collapsible under hamburger menu.

@KazzmanK commented on GitHub (Jul 17, 2023): For such a request it may be sufficient to make left pane be collapsible under hamburger menu.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 09:32:19 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@silverwind commented on GitHub (Jul 18, 2023):

This was https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/25568. Could maybe increase horizontal padding by like 1-2px, but I wouldn't do more.

@silverwind commented on GitHub (Jul 18, 2023): This was https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/25568. Could maybe increase horizontal padding by like 1-2px, but I wouldn't do more.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 09:32:20 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@KN4CK3R commented on GitHub (Jul 18, 2023):

Maybe we could drop some columns like Beobachtungen as they are not really relevant in the admin context.

@KN4CK3R commented on GitHub (Jul 18, 2023): Maybe we could drop some columns like `Beobachtungen` as they are not really relevant in the admin context.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 09:32:20 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@somera commented on GitHub (Jul 18, 2023):

@KN4CK3R I would say this columns
image
are not so important in this view.

@somera commented on GitHub (Jul 18, 2023): @KN4CK3R I would say this columns ![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/8334250/811d9da1-3950-4db7-9975-70ba7da0172c) are not so important in this view.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 09:32:20 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@denyskon commented on GitHub (Jul 18, 2023):

Maybe we should make a separate page with user details to move stuff out of the table

@denyskon commented on GitHub (Jul 18, 2023): Maybe we should make a separate page with user details to move stuff out of the table
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 09:32:21 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@lunny commented on GitHub (Jul 19, 2023):

Group the numbers columns as 1 column if they are not sortable columns.

@lunny commented on GitHub (Jul 19, 2023): Group the numbers columns as 1 column if they are not sortable columns.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 09:32:21 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@somera commented on GitHub (Jul 19, 2023):

I checked the whole new UI and I'm not so happy with mowing the navigation to the left size. When you will extend the table size to WQHD, than it will look better. But the compressend width is not good. Sorry, this was wrong UI change.

@somera commented on GitHub (Jul 19, 2023): I checked the whole new UI and I'm not so happy with mowing the navigation to the left size. When you will extend the table size to WQHD, than it will look better. But the compressend width is not good. Sorry, this was wrong UI change.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 09:32:21 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@denyskon commented on GitHub (Jul 19, 2023):

Regardless of the navigation, I think we need to simplify these tables.

@denyskon commented on GitHub (Jul 19, 2023): Regardless of the navigation, I think we need to simplify these tables.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 09:32:21 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@somera commented on GitHub (Jul 19, 2023):

But you have to fix all tables.

image

image

image

@somera commented on GitHub (Jul 19, 2023): But you have to fix all tables. ![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/8334250/261850b1-1567-4502-ba6b-0e520391a985) ![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/8334250/4a8e904d-75bd-476a-9ea3-5522b4320894) ![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/8334250/8bb8ce75-7216-461a-ae6a-6bd73c9a2fef)
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 09:32:22 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@lunny commented on GitHub (Aug 28, 2023):

The width of admin page could be extended like code review pages.

@lunny commented on GitHub (Aug 28, 2023): The width of admin page could be extended like code review pages.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 09:32:22 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@denyskon commented on GitHub (Aug 31, 2023):

Also needed for at least repo list

@denyskon commented on GitHub (Aug 31, 2023): Also needed for at least repo list
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 09:32:22 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@silverwind commented on GitHub (Aug 31, 2023):

Yes I suppose it could be made flexible full width, but still that's just a workaround that does not help on small screens.

@silverwind commented on GitHub (Aug 31, 2023): Yes I suppose it could be made flexible full width, but still that's just a workaround that does not help on small screens.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 09:32:22 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@denyskon commented on GitHub (Mar 4, 2024):

Reopening, because org and repo details can still be moved out to separate pages

@denyskon commented on GitHub (Mar 4, 2024): Reopening, because org and repo details can still be moved out to separate pages
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 09:32:22 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@lunny commented on GitHub (Apr 8, 2024):

I think the UI problem mentioned in this issue has been resolved. So I will move this issue to another milestone.

@lunny commented on GitHub (Apr 8, 2024): I think the UI problem mentioned in this issue has been resolved. So I will move this issue to another milestone.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 09:32:23 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@somera commented on GitHub (Apr 13, 2024):

I think the UI problem mentioned in this issue has been resolved. So I will move this issue to another milestone.

Gitea version 1.21.10

There are a few small improvements. But it's not "perfect".

Sorted by size
image

Sorted by name
image

Date should be in one line. And the repo size.

@somera commented on GitHub (Apr 13, 2024): > I think the UI problem mentioned in this issue has been resolved. So I will move this issue to another milestone. Gitea version 1.21.10 There are a few small improvements. But it's not "perfect". Sorted by size ![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/8334250/d9c459e0-f0e5-42ac-8bf8-8a57c9b396b8) Sorted by name ![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/8334250/a4fecc8f-1a2d-460d-a550-764876ed3b5a) Date should be in one line. And the repo size.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 09:32:23 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@lunny commented on GitHub (Apr 14, 2024):

#29581 hasn't been backport to v1.21

@lunny commented on GitHub (Apr 14, 2024): #29581 hasn't been backport to v1.21
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 09:32:23 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@lunny commented on GitHub (Sep 20, 2024):

@somera Can you confirm v1.22 still have the problem?

@lunny commented on GitHub (Sep 20, 2024): @somera Can you confirm v1.22 still have the problem?
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 09:32:24 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@somera commented on GitHub (Sep 20, 2024):

I checked it with 1.22.2 and it looks good.

@somera commented on GitHub (Sep 20, 2024): I checked it with 1.22.2 and it looks good.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
$20
$250
$50
$500
backport/done
💎 Bounty
docs-update-needed
good first issue
hacktoberfest
issue/bounty
issue/confirmed
issue/critical
issue/duplicate
issue/needs-feedback
issue/not-a-bug
issue/regression
issue/stale
issue/workaround
lgtm/need 2
modifies/api
modifies/translation
outdated/backport/v1.18
outdated/theme/markdown
outdated/theme/timetracker
performance/bigrepo
performance/cpu
performance/memory
performance/speed
pr/breaking
proposal/accepted
proposal/rejected
pr/wip
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 reviewed/wontfix
💰 Rewarded
skip-changelog
status/blocked
topic/accessibility
topic/api
topic/authentication
topic/build
topic/code-linting
topic/commit-signing
topic/content-rendering
topic/deployment
topic/distribution
topic/federation
topic/gitea-actions
topic/issues
topic/lfs
topic/mobile
topic/moderation
topic/packages
topic/pr
topic/projects
topic/repo
topic/repo-migration
topic/security
topic/theme
topic/ui
topic/ui-interaction
topic/ux
topic/webhooks
topic/wiki
type/bug
type/deprecation
type/docs
type/enhancement
type/feature
type/miscellaneous
type/proposal
type/question
type/refactoring
type/summary
type/testing
type/upstream
No Label topic/ui type/bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/gitea#11253
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?