github-starred/gitea
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea.git synced 2026-03-21 22:16:14 -05:00
Code Issues 2.6k Packages Projects Releases 100 Wiki Activity

Footer dispaly issue #10703

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-11-02 09:15:59 -06:00 by GiteaMirror · 11 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 09:15:59 -06:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @yp05327 on GitHub (Apr 21, 2023).

Description

image

It seems that footer has been changed. (In the middle of the footer, not left and right)

Then if we adjust the browser's width:
image
It seems that there's an issue.

Gitea Version

1.20.0+dev-517-g948a9ee5e

Can you reproduce the bug on the Gitea demo site?

No

Log Gist

No response

Screenshots

No response

Git Version

No response

Operating System

No response

How are you running Gitea?

build

Database

None

Originally created by @yp05327 on GitHub (Apr 21, 2023). ### Description ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18380374/233573621-141e1686-8d09-407d-a847-9492158a3626.png) It seems that footer has been changed. (In the middle of the footer, not left and right) Then if we adjust the browser's width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18380374/233572399-b3f5fc41-cb5e-40b5-8aa1-2a8311e773ae.png) It seems that there's an issue. ### Gitea Version 1.20.0+dev-517-g948a9ee5e ### Can you reproduce the bug on the Gitea demo site? No ### Log Gist _No response_ ### Screenshots _No response_ ### Git Version _No response_ ### Operating System _No response_ ### How are you running Gitea? build ### Database None
GiteaMirror added the type/bug label 2025-11-02 09:15:59 -06:00
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 09:16:00 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@wxiaoguang commented on GitHub (Apr 21, 2023):

Maybe I changed some code and broke it ..... (not sure .... because I made many changes on this element)

I guess we could remove the ui container and fine-tune the footer left & right, it could be simpler

@wxiaoguang commented on GitHub (Apr 21, 2023): Maybe I changed some code and broke it ..... (not sure .... because I made many changes on this element) I guess we could remove the `ui container` and fine-tune the footer left & right, it could be simpler
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 09:16:00 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@yp05327 commented on GitHub (Apr 21, 2023):

Tested in old version(release/v1.18) have no problems.
release/v1.19 have same problem

@yp05327 commented on GitHub (Apr 21, 2023): Tested in old version(release/v1.18) have no problems. release/v1.19 have same problem
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 09:16:00 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@wxiaoguang commented on GitHub (Apr 21, 2023):

Does this look good to you? Fix footer display #24251

@wxiaoguang commented on GitHub (Apr 21, 2023): Does this look good to you? Fix footer display #24251
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 09:16:00 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@yp05327 commented on GitHub (Apr 24, 2023):

@wxiaoguang
When I was checking the question you asked in https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/23625#issuecomment-1518999958,
I found that https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/24182 happend again.

Maybe the fix of this issue is related?
image
image

And private tag, user name also seems strange? Maybe no word break is better(at least the private tag)?

@yp05327 commented on GitHub (Apr 24, 2023): @wxiaoguang When I was checking the question you asked in https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/23625#issuecomment-1518999958, I found that https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/24182 happend again. Maybe the fix of this issue is related? ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18380374/233877789-d9f30cb1-a486-4cd5-b8b0-7077fbaeb1b7.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18380374/233877832-ffe808b8-f0d9-45e4-82ef-64523850d358.png) And `private` tag, user name also seems strange? Maybe no word break is better(at least the `private` tag)?
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 09:16:00 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@yp05327 commented on GitHub (Apr 24, 2023):

It seems that it also happens in the old version:
(gitea.com)
image

@yp05327 commented on GitHub (Apr 24, 2023): It seems that it also happens in the old version: (gitea.com) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18380374/233878205-3bcf4f65-65d0-4a8b-90c3-4ac6e5203356.png)
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 09:16:01 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@wxiaoguang commented on GitHub (Apr 24, 2023):

Maybe the fix of this issue is related?

IMO it's not related. It seems that the "issue list" page width is larger than expected. So a new issue could be fine.

@wxiaoguang commented on GitHub (Apr 24, 2023): > Maybe the fix of this issue is related? IMO it's not related. It seems that the "issue list" page width is larger than expected. So a new issue could be fine.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 09:16:01 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@silverwind commented on GitHub (Apr 24, 2023):

Maybe it's time to find something better for dropdowns. Maybe https://github.com/github/details-menu-element, or even better, use tippy.

@silverwind commented on GitHub (Apr 24, 2023): Maybe it's time to find something better for dropdowns. Maybe https://github.com/github/details-menu-element, or even better, use tippy.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 09:16:01 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@wxiaoguang commented on GitHub (Apr 24, 2023):

It's not related to dropdown.

I think the page width problem is a regression of

Which look like a dirty pollution to existing CSS styles.

@wxiaoguang commented on GitHub (Apr 24, 2023): It's not related to dropdown. I think the page width problem is a regression of * https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/19468 * https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/19486 Which look like a dirty pollution to existing CSS styles.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 09:16:01 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@silverwind commented on GitHub (Apr 24, 2023):

@yp05327 Share link to try page with issue?

@silverwind commented on GitHub (Apr 24, 2023): @yp05327 Share link to try page with issue?
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 09:16:02 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@wxiaoguang commented on GitHub (Apr 28, 2023):

Will be fixed by #24393 (together)

At that time, some people do not understand how to make styles work with Fomantic UI correctly.

@wxiaoguang commented on GitHub (Apr 28, 2023): Will be fixed by #24393 (together) At that time, some people do not understand how to make styles work with Fomantic UI correctly.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-02 09:16:02 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@yp05327 commented on GitHub (Apr 28, 2023):

@silverwind
https://try.gitea.io/yp05327/longnamelongnamelongnamelongnamelongnamelongnamelongnamelongname/issues

@yp05327 commented on GitHub (Apr 28, 2023): @silverwind https://try.gitea.io/yp05327/longnamelongnamelongnamelongnamelongnamelongnamelongnamelongname/issues
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
$20
$250
$50
$500
backport/done
💎 Bounty
docs-update-needed
good first issue
hacktoberfest
issue/bounty
issue/confirmed
issue/critical
issue/duplicate
issue/needs-feedback
issue/not-a-bug
issue/regression
issue/stale
issue/workaround
lgtm/need 2
modifies/api
modifies/translation
outdated/backport/v1.18
outdated/theme/markdown
outdated/theme/timetracker
performance/bigrepo
performance/cpu
performance/memory
performance/speed
pr/breaking
proposal/accepted
proposal/rejected
pr/wip
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 reviewed/wontfix
💰 Rewarded
skip-changelog
status/blocked
topic/accessibility
topic/api
topic/authentication
topic/build
topic/code-linting
topic/commit-signing
topic/content-rendering
topic/deployment
topic/distribution
topic/federation
topic/gitea-actions
topic/issues
topic/lfs
topic/mobile
topic/moderation
topic/packages
topic/pr
topic/projects
topic/repo
topic/repo-migration
topic/security
topic/theme
topic/ui
topic/ui-interaction
topic/ux
topic/webhooks
topic/wiki
type/bug
type/deprecation
type/docs
type/enhancement
type/feature
type/miscellaneous
type/proposal
type/question
type/refactoring
type/summary
type/testing
type/upstream
No Label type/bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/gitea#10703
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?