Use Codecov App #10534

New Issue

GiteaMirror · 2025-11-02T09:10:36-06:00

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-02 09:10:36 -06:00

Originally created by @JakobDev on GitHub (Mar 27, 2023).

Feature Description

This is just a short note for the Admins. Every comment of the codecov bot on a PR in this Repo contains this text:

📣 This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more

When following the link, it says the following:

The precise timeline for this migration has not been determined, but we’re encouraging GitHub users to adopt the App Integration before March of 2023 to prevent any potential future interruption in service.

You may already working on this, but I think it's better to open a Issue in case you don't look closer at the codecov report and missed it, before something breaks.

Screenshots

Originally created by @JakobDev on GitHub (Mar 27, 2023). ### Feature Description This is just a short note for the Admins. Every comment of the codecov bot on a PR in this Repo contains this text: > 📣 This organization is not using Codecov’s [GitHub App Integration](https://github.com/apps/codecov). We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. [Learn more](https://about.codecov.io/blog/codecov-is-updating-its-github-integration/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=go-gitea) When following [the link](https://about.codecov.io/blog/codecov-is-updating-its-github-integration/), it says the following: > The precise timeline for this migration has not been determined, but we’re encouraging GitHub users to adopt the App Integration before March of 2023 to prevent any potential future interruption in service. You may already working on this, but I think it's better to open a Issue in case you don't look closer at the codecov report and missed it, before something breaks. ### Screenshots ![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15185051/227955289-24ff5ce2-878e-42d9-a424-5710efdf25e7.png)

GiteaMirror added the type/proposal topic/build labels 2025-11-02 09:10:36 -06:00

GiteaMirror closed this issue

2025-11-02 09:10:36 -06:00

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-02 09:10:37 -06:00

@delvh commented on GitHub (Mar 27, 2023):

My personal opinion:
😱 what a pity if the absolutely useless tool that does nothing but clutter PRs doesn't work anymore…

@delvh commented on GitHub (Mar 27, 2023): My personal opinion: :scream: what a pity if the absolutely useless tool that does nothing but clutter PRs doesn't work anymore…

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-02 09:10:37 -06:00

@silverwind commented on GitHub (Mar 28, 2023):

Yes, maybe this "app" has an option to turn those comments off while still having the stats and stuff 😉.

@silverwind commented on GitHub (Mar 28, 2023): Yes, maybe this "app" has an option to turn those comments off while still having the stats and stuff 😉.

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-02 09:10:37 -06:00

@jolheiser commented on GitHub (Mar 28, 2023):

fwiw I think code coverage is a good metric to be aware of (albeit not one to die on a hill for)

I'm fine if it no longer runs on PRs, but I think at least some form of using it on the main branch would be good to continue.

In terms of the "GH app integration", I would prefer we continue to use it as-is or find another way that doesn't tie it to GH, as the goal is to eventually move to gitea.com anyways.

@jolheiser commented on GitHub (Mar 28, 2023): fwiw I think code coverage _is_ a good metric to be aware of (albeit not one to die on a hill for) I'm fine if it no longer runs on PRs, but I think at least some form of using it on the main branch would be good to continue. In terms of the "GH app integration", I would prefer we continue to use it as-is or find another way that doesn't tie it to GH, as the goal is to eventually move to gitea.com anyways.

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-02 09:10:37 -06:00

@silverwind commented on GitHub (Mar 28, 2023):

Maybe instead of posting disruptive comments, the integration could append its result to the initial PR message. That way, no extra notifications are triggered like on a comment.

I guess ultimately it is up to the forge software to provide a better interface for coverage stats, like a sidebar entry or such.

@silverwind commented on GitHub (Mar 28, 2023): Maybe instead of posting disruptive comments, the integration could append its result to the initial PR message. That way, no extra notifications are triggered like on a comment. I guess ultimately it is up to the forge software to provide a better interface for coverage stats, like a sidebar entry or such.

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-02 09:10:37 -06:00

@silverwind commented on GitHub (Mar 28, 2023):

One also has to mention that CodeCov provides no integration with gitea, so I wonder if there are more supportative coverage providers we should consider.

Edit: New link to upvote.

@silverwind commented on GitHub (Mar 28, 2023): One also has to mention that CodeCov [provides no integration with gitea](https://community.codecov.com/t/gitea-scm-support/228), so I wonder if there are more supportative coverage providers we should consider. Edit: [New link to upvote](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/p/support-gitea-scm).

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-02 09:10:38 -06:00

@lunny commented on GitHub (Mar 29, 2023):

covergate is a possible service(self-hosted) but with less functionality.

@lunny commented on GitHub (Mar 29, 2023): [covergate](https://github.com/covergates/covergates) is a possible service(self-hosted) but with less functionality.

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-02 09:10:38 -06:00

@silverwind commented on GitHub (Mar 29, 2023):

Yeah, I don't think there exist many viable alternatives to CodeCov unfortunately.

@silverwind commented on GitHub (Mar 29, 2023): Yeah, I don't think there exist many viable alternatives to CodeCov unfortunately.

GiteaMirror commented

2025-11-02 09:10:38 -06:00

@techknowlogick commented on GitHub (Apr 3, 2023):

Yeah, I'm not a fan of the comments either (I like the information provided, but not the amount of space it takes up on a page, and the email it generates for each comment). If only it could use the "Checks" tab of PRs instead.

Either way, I've enabled the app, and will close this ticket. Maybe I'll write a webhook receiver to hide the codecov comments so the comment doesn't take up as much space on the page.

@techknowlogick commented on GitHub (Apr 3, 2023): Yeah, I'm not a fan of the comments either (I like the information provided, but not the amount of space it takes up on a page, and the email it generates for each comment). If only it could use the "Checks" tab of PRs instead. Either way, I've enabled the app, and will close this ticket. Maybe I'll write a webhook receiver to hide the codecov comments so the comment doesn't take up as much space on the page.

Sign in to join this conversation.

Branches Tags

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/gitea#10534