When investigating, I sometimes want to undo an enrichment because it brings too much unwanted information.
Do you think it would be feasible ?
Thank you
Originally created by @johanneskolik on GitHub (Jan 20, 2026).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/reconurge/flowsint/issues/109
Hi,
When investigating, I sometimes want to undo an enrichment because it brings too much unwanted information.
Do you think it would be feasible ?
Thank you
Hey @johanneskolik, I get your point. This is a feature we might want to see in the future (just like do/undo), but is a big one to implement.
I'll add it to the roadmap.
<!-- gh-comment-id:3773757744 -->
@dextmorgn commented on GitHub (Jan 20, 2026):
Hey @johanneskolik, I get your point. This is a feature we might want to see in the future (just like do/undo), but is a big one to implement.
I'll add it to the roadmap.
@johanneskolik @dextmorgn when have time please take a time to review #127 ([WiP] RFC: Agnostic Revert Feature), I'm working a RFC to guide the implementation of this functionality, which is not a trivial feature.
<!-- gh-comment-id:3969984069 -->
@gustavorps commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2026):
@johanneskolik @dextmorgn when have time please take a time to review #127 ([WiP] RFC: Agnostic Revert Feature), I'm working a RFC to guide the implementation of this functionality, which is not a trivial feature.
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Originally created by @johanneskolik on GitHub (Jan 20, 2026).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/reconurge/flowsint/issues/109
Hi,
When investigating, I sometimes want to undo an enrichment because it brings too much unwanted information.
Do you think it would be feasible ?
Thank you
@dextmorgn commented on GitHub (Jan 20, 2026):
Hey @johanneskolik, I get your point. This is a feature we might want to see in the future (just like do/undo), but is a big one to implement.
I'll add it to the roadmap.
@gustavorps commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2026):
@johanneskolik @dextmorgn when have time please take a time to review #127 ([WiP] RFC: Agnostic Revert Feature), I'm working a RFC to guide the implementation of this functionality, which is not a trivial feature.