mirror of
https://github.com/harvard-edge/cs249r_book.git
synced 2026-05-06 09:38:33 -05:00
[GH-ISSUE #1327] [StaffML] Link health 48.2% (520/1004 broken) #5716
No Assignees
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: github-starred/cs249r_book#5716
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @github-actions[bot] on GitHub (Apr 13, 2026).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/harvard-edge/cs249r_book/issues/1327
Weekly StaffML link-health report
Top 10 broken URLs by user-impact
https://mlsysbook.ai/vol1/hw_acceleration.htmlhttps://harvard-edge.github.io/cs249r_book_dev/contents/hw_acceleration/hw_acceleration.htmlhttps://harvard-edge.github.io/cs249r_book_dev/contents/data_engineering/data_engineering.htmlhttps://mlsysbook.ai/vol1/model_compression.htmlhttps://mlsysbook.ai/tinyml/01_microcontroller.htmlhttps://harvard-edge.github.io/cs249r_book_dev/contents/frameworks/frameworks.htmlhttps://mlsysbook.ai/vol1/serving.htmlhttps://mlsysbook.ai/mobile/02_app_experience.htmlhttps://mlsysbook.ai/vol1/dnn_architectures.htmlhttps://mlsysbook.ai/vol1/responsible_engr.htmlFull report attached as artifact
staffml-link-reporton the workflow run.Auto-filed by
.github/workflows/staffml-link-check.yml.@profvjreddi commented on GitHub (Apr 16, 2026):
flagging for attention. 48% broken is a quiet crisis and needs a dedicated audit pass to categorize dead links vs stale-but-fixable ones. not blocking anything today but shouldnt be left sitting much longer.
@profvjreddi commented on GitHub (Apr 17, 2026):
Closing as orphan. The weekly link-check workflow that files and updates this issue was deleted in commit
409d58c57(PR #1348). Seeinterviews/vault/BOOK_LINKING_PLAN.md"2026-04-16 follow-up decision" section for full rationale — book URLs were ~90% stale due to anchor churn, and the StaffML → book linking model was replaced with author-curateddetails.resources: [{name, url}]per question. The 48.2% link health number this issue tracked reflects exactly the anchor-churn problem the new model was adopted to resolve.