[PR #32] [CLOSED] feat(specs): Introduce 'improvement' type #253

New Issue

GiteaMirror · 2026-02-17T11:56:02-06:00

GiteaMirror commented

2026-02-17 11:56:02 -06:00

📋 Pull Request Information

Original PR: https://github.com/conventional-commits/conventionalcommits.org/pull/32
Author: @damianopetrungaro
Created: 1/23/2018
Status: ❌ Closed

Base: master ← Head: master

📝 Commits (1)

bb49a87 feat(specs): Introduce 'improvement' type

📊 Changes

1 file changed (+13 additions, -10 deletions)

View changed files

📝 index.md (+13 -10)

📄 Description

@stevemao let me know what do you think.
I saw in another PR that we'll use noun instead of verb, so improvement is used instead of improve

_{🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.}

## 📋 Pull Request Information **Original PR:** https://github.com/conventional-commits/conventionalcommits.org/pull/32 **Author:** [@damianopetrungaro](https://github.com/damianopetrungaro) **Created:** 1/23/2018 **Status:** ❌ Closed **Base:** `master` ← **Head:** `master` --- ### 📝 Commits (1) - [`bb49a87`](https://github.com/conventional-commits/conventionalcommits.org/commit/bb49a8702b5caa265716983aa01cd379ae06beed) feat(specs): Introduce 'improvement' type ### 📊 Changes **1 file changed** (+13 additions, -10 deletions) <details> <summary>View changed files</summary> 📝 `index.md` (+13 -10) </details> ### 📄 Description @stevemao let me know what do you think. I saw in another PR that we'll use `noun` instead of `verb`, so `improvement` is used instead of `improve` --- <sub>🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.</sub>

GiteaMirror added the pull-request label 2026-02-17 11:56:02 -06:00

GiteaMirror closed this issue

2026-02-17 11:56:03 -06:00

Sign in to join this conversation.

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/conventionalcommits.org#253