mirror of
https://github.com/conventional-commits/conventionalcommits.org.git
synced 2026-03-22 21:24:02 -05:00
Fix on not released feature #120
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @samds on GitHub (Jan 4, 2021).
Hi,
I'd like to use conventional commit in a project but I don't know how to handle the following scenario:
I have a commit that corresponds to the version 1.0.0 of my product.
Now, I'm developing a new feature
I decide to give my user an alpha version 1.1.0-alpha.1. The release note should look like
I fix an issue
and release another alpha
Finally, I'm happy and I want to do a production release
While I want the fix to appear in the release note 1.1.0-alpha.2, I don't want it in the final release note 1.1.0.
How do you guys handle such case?
Thanks,
Sam
@nedbat commented on GitHub (Feb 25, 2021):
Hand-authored release notes?
@damianopetrungaro commented on GitHub (Mar 8, 2021):
@samds Not sure how much it does fit within this repo since this is a specification-only repo.
Not sure how much @nedbat helps since I feel confident this is something which can be automated, but still, in a another which creates release note.
Do you have any link about the releaser you're using?
@samds commented on GitHub (Mar 8, 2021):
@nedbat @damianopetrungaro For now, I do my release note by hand.
I have been using the type
miss:to express a fix on a not released feature but I guess I'm missing something. I'll close this topic because obviously the problem is me and not the specification 😊.