github-starred/better-auth
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth.git synced 2026-07-17 08:20:03 -05:00
Code Issues 2.5k Packages Projects Releases 112 Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #3777] [SSO] Fetch SSO/SAML configuration #9721

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-04-13 05:23:35 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 7 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-13 05:23:35 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @TheUntraceable on GitHub (Aug 4, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/issues/3777

Originally assigned to: @Kinfe123 on GitHub.

Is this suited for github?

  • Yes, this is suited for github

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Right now when you register an SSO provider you cannot fetch the current configuration to allow modifications.

Describe the solution you'd like

A function such as authClient.sso.get({organizationId: ...}) to retrieve the configuration for SSO/SAML

Describe alternatives you've considered

Manually writing your own endpoint to fetch the configuration from your database

Additional context

No response

Originally created by @TheUntraceable on GitHub (Aug 4, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/issues/3777 Originally assigned to: @Kinfe123 on GitHub. ### Is this suited for github? - [x] Yes, this is suited for github ### Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. Right now when you register an SSO provider you cannot fetch the current configuration to allow modifications. ### Describe the solution you'd like A function such as authClient.sso.get({organizationId: ...}) to retrieve the configuration for SSO/SAML ### Describe alternatives you've considered Manually writing your own endpoint to fetch the configuration from your database ### Additional context _No response_
GiteaMirror added the enhancementlocked labels 2026-04-13 05:23:36 -05:00
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-13 05:23:38 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Kinfe123 commented on GitHub (Aug 5, 2025):

Currently, there's a way to fetch the registered spMetadata, but it's limited to service providers (SP). you can use

await auth.api.spMetadata({
   query: {
   	providerId: 'provider-id'
   }
})
<!-- gh-comment-id:3155164636 --> @Kinfe123 commented on GitHub (Aug 5, 2025): Currently, there's a way to fetch the registered spMetadata, but it's limited to service providers (SP). you can use ```ts await auth.api.spMetadata({ query: { providerId: 'provider-id' } }) ```
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-13 05:23:39 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@TheUntraceable commented on GitHub (Aug 6, 2025):

Currently, there's a way to fetch the registered spMetadata, but it's limited to service providers (SP). you can use

await auth.api.spMetadata({
 query: {
 	providerId: 'provider-id'
 }
})

But is there any way to get the configured SSO provider details?

<!-- gh-comment-id:3159611056 --> @TheUntraceable commented on GitHub (Aug 6, 2025): > Currently, there's a way to fetch the registered spMetadata, but it's limited to service providers (SP). you can use > > ```ts > await auth.api.spMetadata({ > query: { > providerId: 'provider-id' > } > }) > ``` But is there any way to get the configured SSO provider details?
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-13 05:23:39 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Kinfe123 commented on GitHub (Aug 6, 2025):

You mean the ones stored in your ssoProvider table?

<!-- gh-comment-id:3159869073 --> @Kinfe123 commented on GitHub (Aug 6, 2025): You mean the ones stored in your ssoProvider table?
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-13 05:23:40 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@TheUntraceable commented on GitHub (Aug 7, 2025):

You mean the ones stored in your ssoProvider table?

Yeah. I want to get that data and present the OIDC config (in my case, also would be useful for SAML), so that users can edit it if needed and view it (or just check if SSO/SAML is even configured)

<!-- gh-comment-id:3165361518 --> @TheUntraceable commented on GitHub (Aug 7, 2025): > You mean the ones stored in your ssoProvider table? Yeah. I want to get that data and present the OIDC config (in my case, also would be useful for SAML), so that users can edit it if needed and view it (or just check if SSO/SAML is even configured)
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-13 05:23:41 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Kinfe123 commented on GitHub (Aug 8, 2025):

If that is needed you can also do it at db level or orm if you do have that. But I will see the potential use case and will add it if that is something that is actually needed.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3168840373 --> @Kinfe123 commented on GitHub (Aug 8, 2025): If that is needed you can also do it at db level or orm if you do have that. But I will see the potential use case and will add it if that is something that is actually needed.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-13 05:23:42 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@TheUntraceable commented on GitHub (Aug 8, 2025):

If that is needed you can also do it at db level or orm if you do have that. But I will see the potential use case and will add it if that is something that is actually needed.

Yeah, definitely I think I could make a PR for this. Right now in my app in the organisation plugin page it currently always prompts for SSO configuration as I can't check if any exists right now.

Would I have to filter out the client ID and client secret when returning it? And for when there is an organisation ID present should I limit it to admin roles? Not sure how to handle the permissions.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3169077414 --> @TheUntraceable commented on GitHub (Aug 8, 2025): > If that is needed you can also do it at db level or orm if you do have that. But I will see the potential use case and will add it if that is something that is actually needed. Yeah, definitely I think I could make a PR for this. Right now in my app in the organisation plugin page it currently always prompts for SSO configuration as I can't check if any exists right now. Would I have to filter out the client ID and client secret when returning it? And for when there is an organisation ID present should I limit it to admin roles? Not sure how to handle the permissions.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-13 05:23:43 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Kinfe123 commented on GitHub (Aug 8, 2025):

Dont you think this should be the thing that you have to internally do it. i dont think there could some source ambiguity on implementing this not the technical wise but somehow the data that we have to return but as long as it is not holding you back from implementing your features thats all good. but as i have said we will even welcome PR and see how people react on the feature. even from the issue.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3169169394 --> @Kinfe123 commented on GitHub (Aug 8, 2025): Dont you think this should be the thing that you have to internally do it. i dont think there could some source ambiguity on implementing this not the technical wise but somehow the data that we have to return but as long as it is not holding you back from implementing your features thats all good. but as i have said we will even welcome PR and see how people react on the feature. even from the issue.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
adapter
astro
awaiting external contributor
blocked
breaking
breaking change
bug
c-devops
core
credentials
database
dependencies
devops
devtools
docs
documentation
duplicate
elysia
enhancement
enterprise
expo
express
fastify
good first issue
help wanted
hono
identity
infra
integration
invalid
javascript
locked
maintenance
need-more-information
needs: info
needs: repro
nextjs
nuxt
oauth
organization
P0
payments
perf
platform
plugin
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
ready
regression
remix
security
social-provider
solid
stale
svelte
tanstack-start
tracking
version-bump
vue
wontfix
No Label enhancement locked
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/better-auth#9721
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?