github-starred/better-auth
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth.git synced 2026-05-23 07:18:56 -05:00
Code Issues 2.5k Packages Projects Releases 112 Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #1655] Support Data Root Wrapper on API Responses to Avoid Root-Level Array Issues #8852

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-04-13 04:05:35 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 3 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-13 04:05:35 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @solarsoft0 on GitHub (Mar 3, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/issues/1655

Is this suited for github?

  • Yes, this is suited for github

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Some environments (e.g., Encore.dev) don’t support root-level arrays on typed API, breaking better-auth client responses expectation.

Describe the solution you'd like

Standardizing with JSend or having a root data wrapper ensures compatibility, consistency, and easier client integration. making better-auth truly backend-agnostic. Thoughts?

Describe alternatives you've considered

Additional context

No response

Originally created by @solarsoft0 on GitHub (Mar 3, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/issues/1655 ### Is this suited for github? - [x] Yes, this is suited for github ### Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. Some environments (e.g., Encore.dev) don’t support root-level arrays on typed API, breaking better-auth client responses expectation. ### Describe the solution you'd like Standardizing with [JSend](https://github.com/omniti-labs/jsend) or having a root data wrapper ensures compatibility, consistency, and easier client integration. making better-auth truly backend-agnostic. Thoughts? ### Describe alternatives you've considered - ### Additional context _No response_
GiteaMirror added the locked label 2026-04-13 04:05:35 -05:00
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-13 04:05:37 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@solarsoft0 commented on GitHub (Mar 3, 2025):

@Bekacru 👋🏾

<!-- gh-comment-id:2694363876 --> @solarsoft0 commented on GitHub (Mar 3, 2025): @Bekacru 👋🏾
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-13 04:05:37 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@solarsoft0 commented on GitHub (Mar 6, 2025):

i think i will send a PR for this.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2703790772 --> @solarsoft0 commented on GitHub (Mar 6, 2025): i think i will send a PR for this.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-13 04:05:38 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@abdul-mustapha commented on GitHub (May 16, 2025):

i think i will send a PR for this.

Did you manage to find a way to get this working?

<!-- gh-comment-id:2886802393 --> @abdul-mustapha commented on GitHub (May 16, 2025): > i think i will send a PR for this. > Did you manage to find a way to get this working?
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
adapter
astro
awaiting external contributor
blocked
breaking
breaking change
bug
c-devops
core
credentials
database
dependencies
devops
devtools
docs
documentation
duplicate
elysia
enhancement
enterprise
expo
express
fastify
good first issue
help wanted
hono
identity
infra
integration
invalid
javascript
locked
maintenance
need-more-information
needs: info
needs: repro
nextjs
nuxt
oauth
organization
P0
payments
perf
platform
plugin
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
ready
regression
remix
security
social-provider
solid
stale
svelte
tanstack-start
tracking
version-bump
vue
wontfix
No Label locked
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/better-auth#8852
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?