github-starred/better-auth
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth.git synced 2026-05-30 10:56:31 -05:00
Code Issues 2.5k Packages Projects Releases 112 Wiki Activity

What do you plan to do? #663

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-03-13 07:59:34 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 1 comment
GiteaMirror commented 2026-03-13 07:59:34 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @Rakhsan on GitHub (Feb 12, 2025).

I just have a simple question. Do you ever plan to deprecate better-auth. I don't want to get scamed like Lucia-auth. I will just have to migrate again if you do

Originally created by @Rakhsan on GitHub (Feb 12, 2025). I just have a simple question. Do you ever plan to deprecate better-auth. I don't want to get scamed like Lucia-auth. I will just have to migrate again if you do
GiteaMirror commented 2026-03-13 07:59:35 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@b3nab commented on GitHub (Feb 14, 2025):

The way you expressed your thoughts is pretty rough, raw and rude.

But focusing just on the concept, yes it's totally understandable that people don't want to waste time with a library that will loose support from their mantainers.

Anyway just a quick note and my 2 cents on this topic:
Keep in mind that this library and the code is open-source, released under the MIT license so you can do literally whatever you want with it. So it's suggested to contribute back to open source projects in the form each one is capable of, like opening and reporting issues, answering to people doubts, create guides/tutorials/videos and help other people. That is the main reason why open-source is still a thing in 2025.

That being said, if you feel "scammed" by a library being deprecated tell me: how much did you paid for lucia-auth to feel scammed? Basically you are ignoring the fact that lucia-auth was an open-source project and people were working and giving all of that for free. What does it mean "open-source" for you?
In any case I strongly suggest you to not try to roll out your own auth system and go with an external maintained and paid one (but even with companies you pay you really don't know if their solution will last forever).

--

Maybe, and I say maybe, if you had just asked it in a better-way™ I would have avoided this rant. lol

@b3nab commented on GitHub (Feb 14, 2025): The way you expressed your thoughts is pretty rough, raw and rude. But focusing just on the concept, yes it's totally understandable that people don't want to waste time with a library that will loose support from their mantainers. Anyway just a quick note and my 2 cents on this topic: Keep in mind that this library and the code is open-source, released under the MIT license so you can do literally whatever you want with it. So it's suggested to contribute back to open source projects in the form each one is capable of, like opening and reporting issues, answering to people doubts, create guides/tutorials/videos and help other people. That is the main reason why open-source is still a thing in 2025. That being said, if you feel "scammed" by a library being deprecated tell me: how much did you paid for lucia-auth to feel scammed? Basically you are ignoring the fact that lucia-auth was an open-source project and people were working and giving all of that for free. What does it mean "open-source" for you? In any case I strongly suggest you to not try to roll out your own auth system and go with an external maintained and paid one (but even with companies you pay you really don't know if their solution will last forever). -- Maybe, and I say maybe, if you had just asked it in a better-way™ I would have avoided this rant. lol
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
adapter
astro
awaiting external contributor
blocked
breaking
breaking change
bug
c-devops
core
credentials
database
dependencies
devops
devtools
docs
documentation
duplicate
elysia
enhancement
enterprise
expo
express
fastify
good first issue
help wanted
hono
identity
infra
integration
invalid
javascript
locked
maintenance
need-more-information
needs: info
needs: repro
nextjs
nuxt
oauth
organization
P0
payments
perf
platform
plugin
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
ready
regression
remix
security
social-provider
solid
stale
svelte
tanstack-start
tracking
version-bump
vue
wontfix
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/better-auth#663
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?