github-starred/better-auth
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth.git synced 2026-05-24 08:01:56 -05:00
Code Issues 2.5k Packages Projects Releases 112 Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #7896] Drizzle adapter mssql support #19574

New Issue
Open
opened 2026-04-15 18:50:20 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 3 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-15 18:50:20 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @JohnFScha on GitHub (Feb 10, 2026).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/issues/7896

Is this suited for github?

  • Yes, this is suited for github

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

I'm currently working on a project that heavily relies on SQL Server (the infra is built entirely on Microsoft's vendor lock-in).

Not having the chance to use drizzle in my node projects creates a serious overhead to roll out my own auth.

Describe the solution you'd like

Drizzle ORM has realesed a beta 1.0.0 with long awaited SQL Server support.

It would be nice to have this translated to the adapter, so as to be able to deploy this architecture from windows server + IIS

Describe alternatives you've considered

I can use sqlite on this windows server instance, but I loose a lot of native types that come in handy in diverse scenarios.

Additional context

No response

Originally created by @JohnFScha on GitHub (Feb 10, 2026). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/issues/7896 ### Is this suited for github? - [x] Yes, this is suited for github ### Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. I'm currently working on a project that heavily relies on SQL Server (the infra is built entirely on Microsoft's vendor lock-in). Not having the chance to use drizzle in my node projects creates a serious overhead to roll out my own auth. ### Describe the solution you'd like Drizzle ORM has realesed a beta 1.0.0 with long awaited SQL Server support. It would be nice to have this translated to the adapter, so as to be able to deploy this architecture from windows server + IIS ### Describe alternatives you've considered I can use sqlite on this windows server instance, but I loose a lot of native types that come in handy in diverse scenarios. ### Additional context _No response_
GiteaMirror added the database label 2026-04-15 18:50:20 -05:00
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-15 18:50:22 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@better-auth-agent[bot] commented on GitHub (Feb 10, 2026):

It looks like you're interested in adding Microsoft SQL Server support to the Drizzle adapter within Better Auth. Currently, there is not direct support for SQL Server in the Better Auth Drizzle adapter, but you mentioned that Drizzle ORM has released a beta version with SQL Server support.

For the feature you’re suggesting, mapping this SQL Server capability into the adapter could indeed enhance its usability for those locked into Microsoft's infrastructure, like in your case. As of now, there is no existing issue or pull request directly related to supporting SQL Server in the Better Auth Drizzle adapter that I could find, but this could be a valuable feature to propose.

I recommend that you consider opening a new issue on GitHub to formally request this feature. You can describe how critical this functionality is for your projects and any specific requirements you might have.

If you have any more questions, feel free to ask! What specific functionalities would you want the SQL Server support to include?

If you need more help, tag @better-auth-agent in a comment so I can respond.

Diagram • Discord • GitHub

Diagram Join Star

<!-- gh-comment-id:3880594016 --> @better-auth-agent[bot] commented on GitHub (Feb 10, 2026): It looks like you're interested in adding Microsoft SQL Server support to the Drizzle adapter within Better Auth. Currently, there is not direct support for SQL Server in the Better Auth Drizzle adapter, but you mentioned that Drizzle ORM has released a beta version with SQL Server support. For the feature you’re suggesting, mapping this SQL Server capability into the adapter could indeed enhance its usability for those locked into Microsoft's infrastructure, like in your case. As of now, there is no existing issue or pull request directly related to supporting SQL Server in the Better Auth Drizzle adapter that I could find, but this could be a valuable feature to propose. I recommend that you consider opening a new issue on GitHub to formally request this feature. You can describe how critical this functionality is for your projects and any specific requirements you might have. If you have any more questions, feel free to ask! What specific functionalities would you want the SQL Server support to include? _If you need more help, tag @better-auth-agent in a comment so I can respond._ <!-- bot:webhook reply v1 --> [Diagram](https://repodiagrams.s3.eu-north-1.amazonaws.com/better-auth_ultra_detailed_interactive.html) • [Discord](https://discord.gg/better-auth) • [GitHub](https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth) [![Diagram](https://img.shields.io/badge/Diagram-2b3137?style=flat-square)](https://repodiagrams.s3.eu-north-1.amazonaws.com/better-auth_ultra_detailed_interactive.html) [![Join](https://img.shields.io/badge/join-5865F2?logo=discord&logoColor=white&style=flat-square)](https://discord.gg/better-auth) [![Star](https://img.shields.io/badge/star-181717?logo=github&logoColor=white&style=flat-square)](https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth)
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-15 18:50:23 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@ping-maxwell commented on GitHub (Feb 11, 2026):

hmm? this should work out of the box.

Are you running into some error?

<!-- gh-comment-id:3882944715 --> @ping-maxwell commented on GitHub (Feb 11, 2026): hmm? this should work out of the box. Are you running into some error?
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-15 18:50:24 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@JohnFScha commented on GitHub (Feb 11, 2026):

It doesn't, instantiating the better-auth client on the backend gives a type error on the provider:

export const auth = betterAuth({
  database: drizzleAdapter(db, {
    provider: "mssql", // Type '"msqql"' is not assignable to type '"pg" | "mysql" | "sqlite"'
  }),
 ...
});
<!-- gh-comment-id:3883990397 --> @JohnFScha commented on GitHub (Feb 11, 2026): It doesn't, instantiating the better-auth client on the backend gives a type error on the provider: ```ts export const auth = betterAuth({ database: drizzleAdapter(db, { provider: "mssql", // Type '"msqql"' is not assignable to type '"pg" | "mysql" | "sqlite"' }), ... }); ```
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
adapter
astro
awaiting external contributor
blocked
breaking
breaking change
bug
c-devops
core
credentials
database
dependencies
devops
devtools
docs
documentation
duplicate
elysia
enhancement
enterprise
expo
express
fastify
good first issue
help wanted
hono
identity
infra
integration
invalid
javascript
locked
maintenance
need-more-information
needs: info
needs: repro
nextjs
nuxt
oauth
organization
P0
payments
perf
platform
plugin
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
ready
regression
remix
security
social-provider
solid
stale
svelte
tanstack-start
tracking
version-bump
vue
wontfix
No Label database
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/better-auth#19574
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?