github-starred/better-auth
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth.git synced 2026-05-23 15:42:09 -05:00
Code Issues 2.5k Packages Projects Releases 112 Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #7180] Docs mismatch: scope type documented as string[]? but code expects string #19384

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-04-15 18:25:39 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 2 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-15 18:25:39 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @juliuslipp on GitHub (Jan 7, 2026).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/issues/7180

Description

The documentation for the OAuth Provider plugin incorrectly states the scope field type as string[]? (optional string array), while the actual implementation expects a string.

References

Originally created by @juliuslipp on GitHub (Jan 7, 2026). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/issues/7180 ### Description The documentation for the OAuth Provider plugin incorrectly states the `scope` field type as `string[]?` (optional string array), while the actual implementation expects a `string`. ### References - **Documentation:** [`oauth-provider.mdx` L1496](https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/blob/b057064e922d5d6f1c69ea2f20e1b73675d7eb7a/docs/content/docs/plugins/oauth-provider.mdx?plain=1#L1496) — shows `string[]?` - **Code:** [`schema.ts` L72](https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/blob/b057064e922d5d6f1c69ea2f20e1b73675d7eb7a/packages/oauth-provider/src/schema.ts#L72) — expects `string`
GiteaMirror added the locked label 2026-04-15 18:25:39 -05:00
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-15 18:25:41 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@better-auth-agent[bot] commented on GitHub (Jan 7, 2026):

Thank you for raising the issue regarding the documentation mismatch on the scope field type in the OAuth Provider plugin. You're correct that the documentation states it as string[]? (optional string array), but the code actually expects it to be a string.

To proceed, I recommend submitting a pull request to update the documentation to align with the code implementation. This will help prevent confusion for users who rely on the documentation for configuration insights. If you're not sure how to draft that PR or if you need any further assistance, please feel free to tag @bekacru or @ping__, and they will be happy to assist you further.

What other details would you like to explore or clarify about the authentication framework or the specific implementation?

If you need more help, tag @better-auth-agent in a comment so I can respond.

Diagram • Discord • GitHub

Diagram Join Star

<!-- gh-comment-id:3720448886 --> @better-auth-agent[bot] commented on GitHub (Jan 7, 2026): Thank you for raising the issue regarding the documentation mismatch on the `scope` field type in the OAuth Provider plugin. You're correct that the documentation states it as `string[]?` (optional string array), but the code actually expects it to be a `string`. To proceed, I recommend submitting a pull request to update the documentation to align with the code implementation. This will help prevent confusion for users who rely on the documentation for configuration insights. If you're not sure how to draft that PR or if you need any further assistance, please feel free to tag @bekacru or @ping__, and they will be happy to assist you further. What other details would you like to explore or clarify about the authentication framework or the specific implementation? _If you need more help, tag @better-auth-agent in a comment so I can respond._ <!-- bot:webhook reply v1 --> [Diagram](https://repodiagrams.s3.eu-north-1.amazonaws.com/skyvern_ultra_detailed_interactive.html) • [Discord](https://discord.gg/fG2XXEuQX3) • [GitHub](https://github.com/Skyvern-AI/Skyvern) [![Diagram](https://img.shields.io/badge/Diagram-2b3137?style=flat-square)](https://repodiagrams.s3.eu-north-1.amazonaws.com/skyvern_ultra_detailed_interactive.html) [![Join](https://img.shields.io/badge/join-5865F2?logo=discord&logoColor=white&style=flat-square)](https://discord.gg/fG2XXEuQX3) [![Star](https://img.shields.io/badge/star-181717?logo=github&logoColor=white&style=flat-square)](https://github.com/Skyvern-AI/Skyvern)
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-15 18:25:42 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@GautamBytes commented on GitHub (Jan 8, 2026):

Will fix it!

<!-- gh-comment-id:3722564308 --> @GautamBytes commented on GitHub (Jan 8, 2026): Will fix it!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
adapter
astro
awaiting external contributor
blocked
breaking
breaking change
bug
c-devops
core
credentials
database
dependencies
devops
devtools
docs
documentation
duplicate
elysia
enhancement
enterprise
expo
express
fastify
good first issue
help wanted
hono
identity
infra
integration
invalid
javascript
locked
maintenance
need-more-information
needs: info
needs: repro
nextjs
nuxt
oauth
organization
P0
payments
perf
platform
plugin
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
ready
regression
remix
security
social-provider
solid
stale
svelte
tanstack-start
tracking
version-bump
vue
wontfix
No Label locked
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/better-auth#19384
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?