github-starred/better-auth
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth.git synced 2026-05-23 07:18:56 -05:00
Code Issues 2.5k Packages Projects Releases 112 Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #811] Rename integrations to frameworks in the docs. #17081

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-04-15 15:02:02 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 4 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-15 15:02:02 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @ping-maxwell on GitHub (Dec 8, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/issues/811

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
"Integrations" can be somewhat confusing, I've scanned the entire docs and improved it over time with a few contributions, but despite personally only use Next.js, when I saw integrations, I never thought to click into it.
image

"Frameworks" may be a less confusing name for it. For users who have concerns or want to know what to do around using Better auth in their choice of framework, this makes sense.

Though I understand that integrations is like "integrating better auth", I still believe that frameworks sounds easier to understand.

Describe the solution you'd like
Rename integrations section in the docs to be frameworks.

Additional context
image
It was this message by a user from the Discord server which made me think that I had the same conclusion too.
I never even considered checking "integrations".
If he had saw "frameworks", he, and other users, may check it first while setting up better auth in their project, thus eliminating a lot of FAQ.

Originally created by @ping-maxwell on GitHub (Dec 8, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/issues/811 **Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** "Integrations" can be somewhat confusing, I've scanned the entire docs and improved it over time with a few contributions, but despite personally only use Next.js, when I saw integrations, I never thought to click into it. <img width="278" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/bf0a66d3-d45a-4759-8ea3-be85f4b5500a"> "Frameworks" may be a less confusing name for it. For users who have concerns or want to know what to do around using Better auth in their choice of framework, this makes sense. > Though I understand that integrations is like "integrating better auth", I still believe that `frameworks` sounds easier to understand. **Describe the solution you'd like** Rename `integrations` section in the docs to be `frameworks`. **Additional context** <img width="801" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7f0e6bb4-c439-4129-bf12-42744fe672cf"> It was this message by a user from the Discord server which made me think that I had the same conclusion too. I never even considered checking "integrations". If he had saw "frameworks", he, and other users, may check it first while setting up better auth in their project, thus eliminating a lot of FAQ.
GiteaMirror added the locked label 2026-04-15 15:02:02 -05:00
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-15 15:02:04 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@ping-maxwell commented on GitHub (Dec 8, 2024):

If you're happy with this, I'll happily update it for you.
And check other links in the repo if any link to the existing integrations docs to update their URL.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2525427115 --> @ping-maxwell commented on GitHub (Dec 8, 2024): If you're happy with this, I'll happily update it for you. And check other links in the repo if any *link* to the existing `integrations` docs to update their URL.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-15 15:02:04 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Sama-004 commented on GitHub (Dec 8, 2024):

+1

<!-- gh-comment-id:2525428412 --> @Sama-004 commented on GitHub (Dec 8, 2024): +1
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-15 15:02:05 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Bekacru commented on GitHub (Dec 16, 2024):

I think it should stay as 'Integration.' Frameworks only describe some of the items listed, but 'Integrations' covers anything, framework or not. It’s about how Better Auth works with different 'things.' I get that it might be a bit confusing, so maybe we could add a link at the end of the installation section to point people to the integrations page along with basic usage.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2545025332 --> @Bekacru commented on GitHub (Dec 16, 2024): I think it should stay as 'Integration.' Frameworks only describe some of the items listed, but 'Integrations' covers anything, framework or not. It’s about how Better Auth works with different 'things.' I get that it might be a bit confusing, so maybe we could add a link at the end of the installation section to point people to the integrations page along with basic usage.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-15 15:02:06 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@ping-maxwell commented on GitHub (Dec 16, 2024):

Alright.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2545888112 --> @ping-maxwell commented on GitHub (Dec 16, 2024): Alright.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
adapter
astro
awaiting external contributor
blocked
breaking
breaking change
bug
c-devops
core
credentials
database
dependencies
devops
devtools
docs
documentation
duplicate
elysia
enhancement
enterprise
expo
express
fastify
good first issue
help wanted
hono
identity
infra
integration
invalid
javascript
locked
maintenance
need-more-information
needs: info
needs: repro
nextjs
nuxt
oauth
organization
P0
payments
perf
platform
plugin
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
ready
regression
remix
security
social-provider
solid
stale
svelte
tanstack-start
tracking
version-bump
vue
wontfix
No Label locked
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/better-auth#17081
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?