github-starred/better-auth
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth.git synced 2026-05-23 07:18:56 -05:00
Code Issues 2.5k Packages Projects Releases 112 Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #95] Support for Qwik #16755

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-04-15 14:43:07 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 7 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-15 14:43:07 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @osdiab on GitHub (Oct 5, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/issues/95

https://www.qwik.dev/

Originally created by @osdiab on GitHub (Oct 5, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/issues/95 https://www.qwik.dev/
GiteaMirror added the locked label 2026-04-15 14:43:07 -05:00
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-15 14:43:08 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@nelsonprsousa commented on GitHub (Feb 6, 2025):

Subscribed! That would be dope 🚀

@Bekacru initially this was tagged for v1.0 but I guess it lost some priority. Any new plans for this?

<!-- gh-comment-id:2640167187 --> @nelsonprsousa commented on GitHub (Feb 6, 2025): Subscribed! That would be dope 🚀 @Bekacru initially this was tagged for v1.0 but I guess it lost some priority. Any new plans for this?
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-15 14:43:09 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@wpaholic commented on GitHub (May 1, 2025):

please @Bekacru .Qwik is superb framework.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2845333466 --> @wpaholic commented on GitHub (May 1, 2025): please @Bekacru .Qwik is superb framework.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-15 14:43:09 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@tinkerer-shubh commented on GitHub (Jun 27, 2025):

is this still on the roadmap? @Bekacru happy to give this one a try and open a pr 🫡

<!-- gh-comment-id:3013203384 --> @tinkerer-shubh commented on GitHub (Jun 27, 2025): is this still on the roadmap? @Bekacru happy to give this one a try and open a pr 🫡
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-15 14:43:09 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@frectonz commented on GitHub (Jul 28, 2025):

Better Auth already supports taking in raw Request objects and returning raw Response objects so all you need to do is create a file src/routes/api/auth/[...all]/index.ts and enter the following contents.

import type { RequestHandler } from "@builder.io/qwik-city";
import { auth } from "~/auth";

export const onRequest: RequestHandler = async (event) => {
	const response = await auth.handler(event.request);
	event.send(response);
};
<!-- gh-comment-id:3127458595 --> @frectonz commented on GitHub (Jul 28, 2025): Better Auth already supports taking in raw `Request` objects and returning raw `Response` objects so all you need to do is create a file ` src/routes/api/auth/[...all]/index.ts` and enter the following contents. ```typescript import type { RequestHandler } from "@builder.io/qwik-city"; import { auth } from "~/auth"; export const onRequest: RequestHandler = async (event) => { const response = await auth.handler(event.request); event.send(response); }; ```
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-15 14:43:10 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@dosubot[bot] commented on GitHub (Oct 27, 2025):

Hi, @osdiab. I'm Dosu, and I'm helping the better-auth team manage their backlog and am marking this issue as stale.

Issue Summary:

  • You requested adding support for the Qwik framework to better-auth.
  • Community members showed interest and asked about the roadmap for this feature.
  • A contributor offered to create a PR, and another shared a code snippet for integrating better-auth with Qwik.
  • No official resolution or merged PR has been made yet.

Next Steps:

  • Please let me know if this issue is still relevant with the latest version of better-auth by commenting here.
  • If I don’t hear back within 7 days, this issue will be automatically closed.

Thanks for your understanding and contribution!

<!-- gh-comment-id:3452148582 --> @dosubot[bot] commented on GitHub (Oct 27, 2025): Hi, @osdiab. I'm [Dosu](https://dosu.dev), and I'm helping the better-auth team manage their backlog and am marking this issue as stale. **Issue Summary:** - You requested adding support for the Qwik framework to better-auth. - Community members showed interest and asked about the roadmap for this feature. - A contributor offered to create a PR, and another shared a code snippet for integrating better-auth with Qwik. - No official resolution or merged PR has been made yet. **Next Steps:** - Please let me know if this issue is still relevant with the latest version of better-auth by commenting here. - If I don’t hear back within 7 days, this issue will be automatically closed. Thanks for your understanding and contribution!
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-15 14:43:10 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jakovljevic-mladen commented on GitHub (Oct 27, 2025):

If I may jump in, this issue is relevant now more than ever. The reason being: Auth.js already supports Qwik and since Auth.js is now part of Better Auth, this should be supported.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3453465678 --> @jakovljevic-mladen commented on GitHub (Oct 27, 2025): If I may jump in, this issue is relevant now more than ever. The reason being: Auth.js [already supports](https://authjs.dev/reference/qwik) Qwik and since Auth.js is now part of Better Auth, this should be supported.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-15 14:43:11 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@dosubot[bot] commented on GitHub (Jan 26, 2026):

Hi, @osdiab. I'm Dosu, and I'm helping the better-auth team manage their backlog and am marking this issue as stale.

Issue Summary:

  • You requested support for the Qwik framework in better-auth, which generated community interest.
  • A contributor shared a basic integration code snippet, and another offered to assist with a PR.
  • No official support or merged PR has been added yet.
  • The issue was previously marked stale pending further feedback.
  • With Auth.js now supporting Qwik, this issue has renewed relevance.

Next Steps:

  • Please let me know if this issue is still relevant with the latest version of better-auth by commenting here.
  • If I don’t hear back within 7 days, the issue will be automatically closed.

Thanks for your understanding and contribution!

<!-- gh-comment-id:3800420678 --> @dosubot[bot] commented on GitHub (Jan 26, 2026): Hi, @osdiab. I'm [Dosu](https://dosu.dev), and I'm helping the better-auth team manage their backlog and am marking this issue as stale. **Issue Summary:** - You requested support for the Qwik framework in better-auth, which generated community interest. - A contributor shared a basic integration code snippet, and another offered to assist with a PR. - No official support or merged PR has been added yet. - The issue was previously marked stale pending further feedback. - With Auth.js now supporting Qwik, this issue has renewed relevance. **Next Steps:** - Please let me know if this issue is still relevant with the latest version of better-auth by commenting here. - If I don’t hear back within 7 days, the issue will be automatically closed. Thanks for your understanding and contribution!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
adapter
astro
awaiting external contributor
blocked
breaking
breaking change
bug
c-devops
core
credentials
database
dependencies
devops
devtools
docs
documentation
duplicate
elysia
enhancement
enterprise
expo
express
fastify
good first issue
help wanted
hono
identity
infra
integration
invalid
javascript
locked
maintenance
need-more-information
needs: info
needs: repro
nextjs
nuxt
oauth
organization
P0
payments
perf
platform
plugin
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
ready
regression
remix
security
social-provider
solid
stale
svelte
tanstack-start
tracking
version-bump
vue
wontfix
No Label locked
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/better-auth#16755
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?