github-starred/better-auth
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth.git synced 2026-05-24 08:01:56 -05:00
Code Issues 2.5k Packages Projects Releases 112 Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #8744] [Docs] accountInfo code snippet is wrong #11180

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-04-13 07:32:25 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 1 comment
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-13 07:32:25 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @mintydev789 on GitHub (Mar 23, 2026).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/issues/8744

Is this suited for github?

  • Yes, this is suited for github

To Reproduce

Go to the docs page for getting account info by provider

Current vs. Expected behavior

It has this code snippet:

const info = await authClient.accountInfo({
  accountId: "accountId", // here you pass in the provider given account id, the provider is automatically detected from the account id
})

But the correct code is this:

const info = await authClient.accountInfo({ query:
  accountId: "accountId", // here you pass in the provider given account id, the provider is automatically detected from the account id
}})

What version of Better Auth are you using?

1.5.5

System info

Not applicable

Which area(s) are affected? (Select all that apply)

Documentation

Auth config (if applicable)

Additional context

No response

Originally created by @mintydev789 on GitHub (Mar 23, 2026). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/issues/8744 ### Is this suited for github? - [x] Yes, this is suited for github ### To Reproduce Go to the [docs page for getting account info by provider](https://better-auth.com/docs/concepts/oauth#get-account-info-provided-by-the-provider) ### Current vs. Expected behavior It has this code snippet: ```ts const info = await authClient.accountInfo({ accountId: "accountId", // here you pass in the provider given account id, the provider is automatically detected from the account id }) ``` But the correct code is this: ```ts const info = await authClient.accountInfo({ query: accountId: "accountId", // here you pass in the provider given account id, the provider is automatically detected from the account id }}) ``` ### What version of Better Auth are you using? 1.5.5 ### System info ```bash Not applicable ``` ### Which area(s) are affected? (Select all that apply) Documentation ### Auth config (if applicable) ```typescript ``` ### Additional context _No response_
GiteaMirror added the locked label 2026-04-13 07:32:25 -05:00
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-13 07:32:26 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2026):

This issue has been locked as it was closed more than 7 days ago. If you're experiencing a similar problem or you have additional context, please open a new issue and reference this one.

<!-- gh-comment-id:4165909832 --> @github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2026): This issue has been locked as it was closed more than 7 days ago. If you're experiencing a similar problem or you have additional context, please open a new issue and reference this one.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
adapter
astro
awaiting external contributor
blocked
breaking
breaking change
bug
c-devops
core
credentials
database
dependencies
devops
devtools
docs
documentation
duplicate
elysia
enhancement
enterprise
expo
express
fastify
good first issue
help wanted
hono
identity
infra
integration
invalid
javascript
locked
maintenance
need-more-information
needs: info
needs: repro
nextjs
nuxt
oauth
organization
P0
payments
perf
platform
plugin
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
ready
regression
remix
security
social-provider
solid
stale
svelte
tanstack-start
tracking
version-bump
vue
wontfix
No Label locked
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/better-auth#11180
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?