github-starred/better-auth
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth.git synced 2026-05-24 08:01:56 -05:00
Code Issues 2.5k Packages Projects Releases 112 Wiki Activity

adapter to unadapter #1086

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-03-13 08:21:50 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 4 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2026-03-13 08:21:50 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @productdevbook on GitHub (Apr 20, 2025).

Originally assigned to: @ping-maxwell on GitHub.

Is this suited for github?

  • Yes, this is suited for github

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

I don't know how good a solution it will be for you, but I managed to extract and organize the better-auth adapter structure. It is currently being used in several different projects. I can help you migrate the better-auth adapter to it if you think it's appropriate. unadapter

Describe the solution you'd like

I think it would be good to use a common adapter structure.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Additional context

No response

Originally created by @productdevbook on GitHub (Apr 20, 2025). Originally assigned to: @ping-maxwell on GitHub. ### Is this suited for github? - [x] Yes, this is suited for github ### Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. I don't know how good a solution it will be for you, but I managed to extract and organize the better-auth adapter structure. It is currently being used in several different projects. I can help you migrate the better-auth adapter to it if you think it's appropriate. [unadapter](https://github.com/productdevbook/unadapter) ### Describe the solution you'd like I think it would be good to use a common adapter structure. ### Describe alternatives you've considered - ### Additional context _No response_
GiteaMirror added the enhancementadapter labels 2026-03-13 08:21:50 -05:00
GiteaMirror commented 2026-03-13 08:21:51 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@ping-maxwell commented on GitHub (Apr 20, 2025):

After discussion with the team, we will not be using this. Thanks for the suggestion however.

I'll close this for now.

@ping-maxwell commented on GitHub (Apr 20, 2025): After discussion with the team, we will not be using this. Thanks for the suggestion however. I'll close this for now.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-03-13 08:21:51 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@productdevbook commented on GitHub (Apr 20, 2025):

Thank you, Is there any way to find out your reasons for not using it? Maybe there's a possibility that I can regulate it.

@productdevbook commented on GitHub (Apr 20, 2025): Thank you, Is there any way to find out your reasons for not using it? Maybe there's a possibility that I can regulate it.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-03-13 08:21:51 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Bekacru commented on GitHub (Apr 20, 2025):

@productdevbook Mostly because we don't want outsource our adapter implementations

@Bekacru commented on GitHub (Apr 20, 2025): @productdevbook Mostly because we don't want outsource our adapter implementations
GiteaMirror commented 2026-03-13 08:21:51 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@productdevbook commented on GitHub (Apr 20, 2025):

So are there reasons for this? I wonder what factors outside are preventing you from doing this. So my aim here is not to force you to use it. I'm trying to research and learn.

@productdevbook commented on GitHub (Apr 20, 2025): So are there reasons for this? I wonder what factors outside are preventing you from doing this. So my aim here is not to force you to use it. I'm trying to research and learn.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
adapter
astro
awaiting external contributor
blocked
breaking
breaking change
bug
c-devops
core
credentials
database
dependencies
devops
devtools
docs
documentation
duplicate
elysia
enhancement
enterprise
expo
express
fastify
good first issue
help wanted
hono
identity
infra
integration
invalid
javascript
locked
maintenance
need-more-information
needs: info
needs: repro
nextjs
nuxt
oauth
organization
P0
payments
perf
platform
plugin
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
ready
regression
remix
security
social-provider
solid
stale
svelte
tanstack-start
tracking
version-bump
vue
wontfix
No Label adapter enhancement
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/better-auth#1086
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?