github-starred/better-auth
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth.git synced 2026-05-22 14:21:55 -05:00
Code Issues 2.5k Packages Projects Releases 112 Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #6736] Magic Links: Save Token in SecondaryStorage when No Database is defined #10606

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-04-13 06:51:00 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 1 comment
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-13 06:51:00 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @thipperz on GitHub (Dec 13, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/issues/6736

Is this suited for github?

  • Yes, this is suited for github

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

No response

Describe the solution you'd like

I'm currently using Stateless Auth (no database)

Magic Links do not seem to work without a database.

I'd like to be able to define custom Set/Get functions in order to make it work without a database.

Utilizing secondaryStorage for that would also work.

Describe alternatives you've considered

I thought that defining secondaryStorage without a database would work just like that, but it seems to not be the case.

Additional context

No response

Originally created by @thipperz on GitHub (Dec 13, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/issues/6736 ### Is this suited for github? - [x] Yes, this is suited for github ### Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. _No response_ ### Describe the solution you'd like I'm currently using Stateless Auth (no database) Magic Links do not seem to work without a database. I'd like to be able to define custom Set/Get functions in order to make it work without a database. Utilizing secondaryStorage for that would also work. ### Describe alternatives you've considered I thought that defining secondaryStorage without a database would work just like that, but it seems to not be the case. ### Additional context _No response_
GiteaMirror added the enhancementlocked labels 2026-04-13 06:51:01 -05:00
GiteaMirror commented 2026-04-13 06:51:02 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@bytaesu commented on GitHub (Jan 14, 2026):

Hi @thipperz,

Using only in-memory adapter in stateless mode is not suitable for Magic Links, as the server cannot guarantee token persistence during its valid period.

If you have any further questions, feel free to let me know 🙂

<!-- gh-comment-id:3747282555 --> @bytaesu commented on GitHub (Jan 14, 2026): Hi @thipperz, Using only in-memory adapter in stateless mode is not suitable for Magic Links, as the server cannot guarantee token persistence during its valid period. If you have any further questions, feel free to let me know 🙂
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
adapter
astro
awaiting external contributor
blocked
breaking
breaking change
bug
c-devops
core
credentials
database
dependencies
devops
devtools
docs
documentation
duplicate
elysia
enhancement
enterprise
expo
express
fastify
good first issue
help wanted
hono
identity
infra
integration
invalid
javascript
locked
maintenance
need-more-information
needs: info
needs: repro
nextjs
nuxt
oauth
organization
P0
payments
perf
platform
plugin
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
ready
regression
remix
security
social-provider
solid
stale
svelte
tanstack-start
tracking
version-bump
vue
wontfix
No Label enhancement locked
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/better-auth#10606
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?