License from kahun/awesome-sysadmin #674

Closed
opened 2025-11-19 20:57:30 -06:00 by GiteaMirror · 2 comments
Owner

Originally created by @garethsaxby on GitHub (Dec 24, 2015).

The original source of this fork, kahun/awesome-sysadmin, has no license against it, so is covered under standard copyright, whilst this fork has the CC-BY-SA license applied in this commit.

I believe the fork occurred at this commit with the tree at this time not containing a license.

Was permission obtained from the original maintainer? I know that the original project is in a very infrequently updated state, however with no license on the original content, if there's no permission then it seems that there's no right to apply a license to this repo?

Sorry if this has been discussed before; I've had a search through the issues and couldn't see any mention of the license against the repository itself.

Originally created by @garethsaxby on GitHub (Dec 24, 2015). The original source of this fork, [kahun/awesome-sysadmin](https://github.com/kahun/awesome-sysadmin), has no license against it, so is covered under standard copyright, whilst this fork has the CC-BY-SA license applied in [this commit](https://github.com/n1trux/awesome-sysadmin/commit/3abf5b4f63dcd7b6ea7ec572bf27239d80621496#diff-61e0bdf7e1b43c5c93d9488b22e04170). I believe the fork occurred [at this commit](https://github.com/kahun/awesome-sysadmin/commit/48fe9bc5245fd5fc66149ba072376c41548c891b) with the [tree at this time](https://github.com/kahun/awesome-sysadmin/tree/48fe9bc5245fd5fc66149ba072376c41548c891b) not containing a license. Was permission obtained from the original maintainer? I know that the original project is in a very infrequently updated state, however with no license on the original content, if there's no permission then it seems that there's no right to apply a license to this repo? Sorry if this has been discussed before; I've had a search through the issues and couldn't see any mention of the license against the repository itself.
GiteaMirror added the question / discussion label 2025-11-19 20:57:30 -06:00
Author
Owner

@n1trux commented on GitHub (Jan 1, 2016):

Was permission obtained from the original maintainer?

I tried and failed to contact him multiple times, but I doubt that this doesn't fall under Fair Use or that he has anything against it. It's just a list.

if there's no permission then it seems that there's no right to apply a license to this repo?

I asked that myself and then concluded that the facts that @kahun accepted contributions and allowed forks before as well as his name in the "forked from kahun/awesome-sysadmin" below the repository name would be enough for now.

If you can contact him somehow, I'd really appreciate it.

@n1trux commented on GitHub (Jan 1, 2016): > Was permission obtained from the original maintainer? I tried and failed to contact him multiple times, but I doubt that this doesn't fall under Fair Use or that he has anything against it. It's just a list. > if there's no permission then it seems that there's no right to apply a license to this repo? I asked that myself and then concluded that the facts that @kahun accepted contributions and allowed forks before as well as his name in the "forked from kahun/awesome-sysadmin" below the repository name would be enough for now. If you can contact him somehow, I'd really appreciate it.
Author
Owner

@n1trux commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2016):

License of @kahun's repo is now CC-BY-SA, which should be covered by mentioning him at the top of the repository. If @kahun likes, I'll add a file with all the contributors in them.

@n1trux commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2016): License of @kahun's repo is now CC-BY-SA, which should be covered by mentioning him at the top of the repository. If @kahun likes, I'll add a file with all the contributors in them.
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/awesome-sysadmin#674