[PR #759] [CLOSED] Add Packet Test Bundle to Troubleshooting #3423

New Issue

GiteaMirror · 2026-04-19T05:21:06-05:00

GiteaMirror commented

2026-04-19 05:21:06 -05:00

📋 Pull Request Information

Original PR: https://github.com/awesome-foss/awesome-sysadmin/pull/759
Author: @galenthas
Created: 4/18/2026
Status: ❌ Closed

Base: master ← Head: add-packet-test-bundle

📝 Commits (1)

20a5cda Add Packet Test Bundle to Troubleshooting

📊 Changes

1 file changed (+1 additions, -0 deletions)

View changed files

📝 README.md (+1 -0)

📄 Description

Your additions are Free software
Submit one item per pull request.
Format your submission as follows.
Additions are inserted preserving alphabetical order.
Additions are not already listed at awesome-selfhosted
You have searched the repository for any relevant issues or PRs, including closed ones.
Any software project you are adding to the list is actively maintained.
The pull request title is informative.

Why is it awesome?

It combines three common network troubleshooting CLI tools (iperf2, iperf3, tshark) into a single native GUI with live throughput and latency charts. Instead of switching between terminal windows and parsing text output, you get real-time ImPlot graphs and one-click server/client mode switching. It is the only open-source tool that bundles both iperf bandwidth testing and tshark packet capture in a single interface.

Have you used it? For how long?

Yes, since the initial release. Used for LAN throughput testing and packet capture during network troubleshooting.

Is this in a personal or professional setup?

Both — personal home network testing and professional network diagnostics.

How many devices/users/services/... do you manage with it?

Used across a small fleet of Windows workstations for point-to-point network testing.

Biggest pros/cons compared to other solutions?

Pros: Single portable .exe, no Java runtime (unlike jperf), combines iperf + tshark in one UI, live charts.
Cons: Windows-only, relatively new project.

Any other comments?

MIT licensed, C++17, builds with CMake/Ninja. Bundles iperf2, iperf3, and tshark so there are no external dependencies beyond Npcap for packet capture.

_{🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.}

## 📋 Pull Request Information **Original PR:** https://github.com/awesome-foss/awesome-sysadmin/pull/759 **Author:** [@galenthas](https://github.com/galenthas) **Created:** 4/18/2026 **Status:** ❌ Closed **Base:** `master` ← **Head:** `add-packet-test-bundle` --- ### 📝 Commits (1) - [`20a5cda`](https://github.com/awesome-foss/awesome-sysadmin/commit/20a5cda8831703b76881e0a4d2fc9caff625ca44) Add Packet Test Bundle to Troubleshooting ### 📊 Changes **1 file changed** (+1 additions, -0 deletions) <details> <summary>View changed files</summary> 📝 `README.md` (+1 -0) </details> ### 📄 Description - [x] Your additions are [Free software](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software) - [x] Submit one item per pull request. - [x] Format your submission as follows. - [x] Additions are inserted preserving alphabetical order. - [x] Additions are not already listed at [awesome-selfhosted](https://awesome-selfhosted.net) - [x] You have searched the repository for any relevant issues or PRs, including closed ones. - [x] Any software project you are adding to the list is actively maintained. - [x] The pull request title is informative. --- - **Why is it awesome?** It combines three common network troubleshooting CLI tools (iperf2, iperf3, tshark) into a single native GUI with live throughput and latency charts. Instead of switching between terminal windows and parsing text output, you get real-time ImPlot graphs and one-click server/client mode switching. It is the only open-source tool that bundles both iperf bandwidth testing and tshark packet capture in a single interface. - **Have you used it? For how long?** Yes, since the initial release. Used for LAN throughput testing and packet capture during network troubleshooting. - **Is this in a personal or professional setup?** Both — personal home network testing and professional network diagnostics. - **How many devices/users/services/... do you manage with it?** Used across a small fleet of Windows workstations for point-to-point network testing. - **Biggest pros/cons compared to other solutions?** Pros: Single portable .exe, no Java runtime (unlike jperf), combines iperf + tshark in one UI, live charts. Cons: Windows-only, relatively new project. - **Any other comments?** MIT licensed, C++17, builds with CMake/Ninja. Bundles iperf2, iperf3, and tshark so there are no external dependencies beyond Npcap for packet capture. --- <sub>🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.</sub>

GiteaMirror added the pull-request label 2026-04-19 05:21:06 -05:00

GiteaMirror changed title from ~~[PR #759] Add Packet Test Bundle to Troubleshooting~~ to [PR #759] [CLOSED] Add Packet Test Bundle to Troubleshooting

2026-04-21 16:13:36 -05:00

GiteaMirror closed this issue

2026-04-21 16:13:36 -05:00

Sign in to join this conversation.

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/awesome-sysadmin#3423