[GH-ISSUE #368] Request Community Review: oauth2-proxy #2762

Open
opened 2026-04-19 04:57:09 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 3 comments
Owner

Originally created by @nodiscc on GitHub (Jan 13, 2022).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/awesome-foss/awesome-sysadmin/issues/368

A reverse proxy that provides authentication with Google, Azure, OpenID Connect and many more identity providers.

Go
MIT

I have not tested it but it seems popular, can be installed as a single binary, work with any oAuth2 provided inclusing self-hosted ones

Originally created by @nodiscc on GitHub (Jan 13, 2022). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/awesome-foss/awesome-sysadmin/issues/368 - https://oauth2-proxy.github.io/oauth2-proxy/ - https://github.com/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy > A reverse proxy that provides authentication with Google, Azure, OpenID Connect and many more identity providers. `Go` `MIT` I have not tested it but it seems popular, can be installed as a single binary, work with any oAuth2 provided inclusing self-hosted ones
GiteaMirror added the additionhelp wanted labels 2026-04-19 04:57:09 -05:00
Author
Owner

@mffap commented on GitHub (Jan 19, 2022):

Great tool, should be on there. I wanted to add it under identity management as well. Why not do a PR?

<!-- gh-comment-id:1016256013 --> @mffap commented on GitHub (Jan 19, 2022): Great tool, should be on there. I wanted to add it under identity management as well. Why not do a PR?
Author
Owner

@anonhostpi commented on GitHub (Jul 1, 2025):

@mffap nodiscc is a reviewer. Creating said PR would not be unbiased.

This is basically nodiscc asking if the community agrees and if so, voice it by opening a PR independently

<!-- gh-comment-id:3023063123 --> @anonhostpi commented on GitHub (Jul 1, 2025): @mffap nodiscc is a reviewer. Creating said PR would not be unbiased. This is basically nodiscc asking if the community agrees and if so, voice it by opening a PR _independently_
Author
Owner

@anonhostpi commented on GitHub (Jul 1, 2025):

@nodiscc maybe these issues should have more descriptive titles via replacing "Add" with "Request Review:" or more verbosely "Request Community Review?"

<!-- gh-comment-id:3023080234 --> @anonhostpi commented on GitHub (Jul 1, 2025): @nodiscc maybe these issues should have more descriptive titles via replacing "Add" with "Request Review:" or more verbosely "Request Community Review?"
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/awesome-sysadmin#2762