[GH-ISSUE #368] Request Community Review: oauth2-proxy #18281

New Issue

GiteaMirror · 2026-07-12T02:12:55-05:00

GiteaMirror commented

2026-07-12 02:12:55 -05:00

Originally created by @nodiscc on GitHub (Jan 13, 2022).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/awesome-foss/awesome-sysadmin/issues/368

A reverse proxy that provides authentication with Google, Azure, OpenID Connect and many more identity providers.

Go
MIT

I have not tested it but it seems popular, can be installed as a single binary, work with any oAuth2 provided inclusing self-hosted ones

Originally created by @nodiscc on GitHub (Jan 13, 2022). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/awesome-foss/awesome-sysadmin/issues/368 - https://oauth2-proxy.github.io/oauth2-proxy/ - https://github.com/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy > A reverse proxy that provides authentication with Google, Azure, OpenID Connect and many more identity providers. `Go` `MIT` I have not tested it but it seems popular, can be installed as a single binary, work with any oAuth2 provided inclusing self-hosted ones

GiteaMirror added the addition help wanted labels 2026-07-12 02:12:55 -05:00

GiteaMirror closed this issue

2026-07-12 02:12:56 -05:00

GiteaMirror commented

2026-07-12 02:12:58 -05:00

@mffap commented on GitHub (Jan 19, 2022):

Great tool, should be on there. I wanted to add it under identity management as well. Why not do a PR?

@mffap commented on GitHub (Jan 19, 2022): Great tool, should be on there. I wanted to add it under identity management as well. Why not do a PR?

GiteaMirror commented

2026-07-12 02:12:59 -05:00

@anonhostpi commented on GitHub (Jul 1, 2025):

@mffap nodiscc is a reviewer. Creating said PR would not be unbiased.

This is basically nodiscc asking if the community agrees and if so, voice it by opening a PR independently

@anonhostpi commented on GitHub (Jul 1, 2025): @mffap nodiscc is a reviewer. Creating said PR would not be unbiased. This is basically nodiscc asking if the community agrees and if so, voice it by opening a PR _independently_

GiteaMirror commented

2026-07-12 02:13:00 -05:00

@anonhostpi commented on GitHub (Jul 1, 2025):

@nodiscc maybe these issues should have more descriptive titles via replacing "Add" with "Request Review:" or more verbosely "Request Community Review?"

@anonhostpi commented on GitHub (Jul 1, 2025): @nodiscc maybe these issues should have more descriptive titles via replacing "Add" with "Request Review:" or more verbosely "Request Community Review?"

GiteaMirror commented

2026-07-12 02:13:01 -05:00

@Rabenherz112 commented on GitHub (Jun 19, 2026):

Thanks for reaching out!

We've migrated all contributions over to a new repository: awesome-foss/awesome-sysadmin-data. Submissions are now handled there instead of in this repo.

If you're suggesting software, please resubmit it over at the new repo so we can review it.

Closing this Issue for now, sorry for the extra step, and thanks for understanding

@Rabenherz112 commented on GitHub (Jun 19, 2026): Thanks for reaching out! We've migrated all contributions over to a new repository: **[awesome-foss/awesome-sysadmin-data](https://github.com/awesome-foss/awesome-sysadmin-data)**. Submissions are now handled there instead of in this repo. If you're suggesting software, please resubmit it over at the new repo so we can review it. Closing this Issue for now, sorry for the extra step, and thanks for understanding

Sign in to join this conversation.

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/awesome-sysadmin#18281