github-starred/awesome-sysadmin
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/awesome-foss/awesome-sysadmin.git synced 2026-03-09 03:33:05 -05:00
Code Issues 104 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Add "features limited or restricted by licensing" anti-feature marker #102

New Issue
Open
opened 2025-11-06 16:44:59 -06:00 by GiteaMirror · 0 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-06 16:44:59 -06:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @anonhostpi on GitHub (Jun 13, 2025).

On this particular thread, it was mentioned that there may be a need to provide a disclaimer or flag for certain projects that have not-so-obvious caveats:

I don't really mind, especially SAML... 😭 but I think we should add an anti-feature warning similar to https://awesome-selfhosted.net/ (Security features exclusive to non-free tier or something close)

I think a more appropriate option would be Security features limited or restricted by licensing. This would prevent contributors from trying to circumvent the flag through usage of legal verbage.

I am moving the conversation here.

I think adding [xxxxx] features limited or restricted by licensing flags and other disclaimers would be a valuable disclosure for people considering certain projects.

This was driven by a conversation about https://sso.tax applicability to certain projects listed here.

Originally created by @anonhostpi on GitHub (Jun 13, 2025). On [this particular thread](https://github.com/awesome-foss/awesome-sysadmin/pull/618), it was mentioned that there may be a need to provide a disclaimer or flag for certain projects that have not-so-obvious caveats: > > I don't really mind, especially SAML... 😭 but I think we should add an anti-feature warning similar to https://awesome-selfhosted.net/ (`Security features exclusive to non-free tier` or something close) > > I think a more appropriate option would be `Security features limited or restricted by licensing`. This would prevent contributors from trying to circumvent the flag through usage of legal verbage. I am moving the conversation here. I think adding `[xxxxx] features limited or restricted by licensing` flags and other disclaimers would be a valuable disclosure for people considering certain projects. This was driven by a conversation about https://sso.tax applicability to certain projects listed here.
GiteaMirror added the feedback neededenhancement labels 2025-11-06 16:44:59 -06:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
addition
curation
discussion
duplicate
enhancement
feedback needed
fix
help wanted
invalid
non-free
not awesome enough
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question / discussion
reviewers wanted
tools
No Label enhancement feedback needed
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/awesome-sysadmin#102
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?