Originally created by @waldyrious on GitHub (May 25, 2015).
It would be nice to merge efforts.
Clickable link: https://github.com/bayandin/awesome-awesomeness
/cc @bayandin
That list is pretty inactive. Look at last commit date and the PR queue.
Happy to have it merged in here though.
@sindresorhus commented on GitHub (May 25, 2015):
That list is pretty inactive. Look at last commit date and the PR queue.
Happy to have it merged in here though.
Fair enough, but why close this issue? The suggestion was merge with, not merge into; the direction of the merge is surely something that can and should be discussed. I would say that e.g. if a PR is opened to add the entries here, its merging should close this issue.
Anyway, I've pinged @bayandin, who was active as recently as last week so I'd suggest we at least give it a couple days for him to voice his thoughts here. Please consider reopening :)
@waldyrious commented on GitHub (May 25, 2015):
Fair enough, but why close this issue? The suggestion was merge with, not merge into; the direction of the merge is surely something that can and should be discussed. I would say that e.g. if a PR is opened to add the entries here, its merging should close this issue.
Anyway, I've pinged @bayandin, who was active [as recently as last week](https://github.com/bayandin?tab=activity) so I'd suggest we at least give it a couple days for him to voice his thoughts here. Please consider reopening :)
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Originally created by @waldyrious on GitHub (May 25, 2015).
It would be nice to merge efforts.
Clickable link: https://github.com/bayandin/awesome-awesomeness
/cc @bayandin
@sindresorhus commented on GitHub (May 25, 2015):
That list is pretty inactive. Look at last commit date and the PR queue.
Happy to have it merged in here though.
@waldyrious commented on GitHub (May 25, 2015):
Fair enough, but why close this issue? The suggestion was merge with, not merge into; the direction of the merge is surely something that can and should be discussed. I would say that e.g. if a PR is opened to add the entries here, its merging should close this issue.
Anyway, I've pinged @bayandin, who was active as recently as last week so I'd suggest we at least give it a couple days for him to voice his thoughts here. Please consider reopening :)
@waldyrious commented on GitHub (Jun 7, 2015):
God, I hate github abandonware. Thanks for the patience @sindresorhus :)