mirror of
https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome.git
synced 2026-07-19 04:53:11 -05:00
[PR #3863] Add LLM Papers #10763
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
📋 Pull Request Information
Original PR: https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome/pull/3863
Author: @puneet-chandna
Created: 1/9/2026
Status: 🔄 Open
Base:
main← Head:patch-1📝 Commits (2)
6f6994aAdd LLM Papers1e128f2Add LLM Papers📊 Changes
1 file changed (+2 additions, -0 deletions)
View changed files
📝
readme.md(+2 -0)📄 Description
https://github.com/puneet-chandna/awesome-LLM-papers
A curated list of seminal and breakthrough papers in Large Language Models. Focuses on papers that fundamentally changed the field, with detailed summaries and practical impact analysis.
PRs reviewed:
https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome/pull/3861
https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome/pull/3859
By submitting this pull request I confirm I've read and complied with the below requirements 🖖
Please read it multiple times. I spent a lot of time on these guidelines and most people miss a lot.
Requirements for your pull request
Don't open a Draft / WIP pull request while you work on the guidelines. A pull request should be 100% ready and should adhere to all the guidelines when you open it. Instead use #2242 for incubation visibility.
Don't waste my time. Do a good job, adhere to all the guidelines, and be responsive.
You have to review at least 2 other open pull requests.
Try to prioritize unreviewed PRs, but you can also add more comments to reviewed PRs. Go through the below list when reviewing. This requirement is meant to help make the Awesome project self-sustaining. Comment here which PRs you reviewed. You're expected to put a good effort into this and to be thorough. Look at previous PR reviews for inspiration. Just commenting “looks good” or simply marking the pull request as approved does not count! You have to actually point out mistakes or improvement suggestions. Comments pointing out lint violation are allowed, but does not count as a review.
You have read and understood the instructions for creating a list.
This pull request has a title in the format
Add Name of List. It should not contain the wordAwesome.Add SwiftAdd Software ArchitectureUpdate readme.mdAdd Awesome SwiftAdd swiftadd SwiftAdding SwiftAdded SwiftYour entry here should include a short description of the project/theme of the list. It should not describe the list itself. The first character should be uppercase and the description should end in a dot. It should be an objective description and not a tagline or marketing blurb. It should not contain the name of the list.
- [iOS](…) - Mobile operating system for Apple phones and tablets.- [Framer](…) - Prototyping interactive UI designs.- [iOS](…) - Resources and tools for iOS development.- [Framer](…)- [Framer](…) - prototyping interactive UI designsYour entry should be added at the bottom of the appropriate category.
The title of your entry should be title-cased and the URL to your list should end in
#readme.- [Software Architecture](https://github.com/simskij/awesome-software-architecture#readme) - The discipline of designing and building software.No blockchain-related lists.
The suggested Awesome list complies with the below requirements.
Requirements for your Awesome list
That means 30 days from either the first real commit or when it was open-sourced. Whatever is most recent.
awesome-linton your list and fix the reported issues. If there are false-positives or things that cannot/shouldn't be fixed, please report it.main, notmaster.Mobile operating system for Apple phones and tablets.Prototyping interactive UI designs.Resources and tools for iOS development.Awesome Framer packages and tools.If you have not put in considerable effort into your list, your pull request will be immediately closed.
awesome-name-of-list.awesome-swiftawesome-web-typographyawesome-SwiftAwesomeWebTypography# Awesome Name of List.# Awesome Swift# Awesome Web Typography# awesome-swift# AwesomeSwiftawesome-list&awesomeas GitHub topics. I encourage you to add more relevant topics.Awesome Xand a logo withAwesome X. You can put the header image in a#(Markdown header) or<h1>.Contents, notTable of Contents.ContributingorFootnotessections.https://github.com/<user>/<repo>/community/license/new?branch=main&template=cc0-1.0(replace<user>and<repo>accordingly).licenseorLICENSEin the repo root with the license text.Licencesection to the readme. GitHub already shows the license name and link to the full text at the top of the repo.unicorn.contributing.md. The casing is up to you.Contributing, positioned at the top or bottom of the main content.Footnotessection at the bottom of the readme. The section should not be present in the Table of Contents.Example:
- [AVA](…) - JavaScript test runner.Node.js, notNodeJSornode.js.You can still use a CI for linting, but the badge has no value in the readme.
Inspired by awesome-fooorInspired by the Awesome projectkinda link at the top of the readme. The Awesome badge is enough.Go to the top and read it again.
🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.