Does my platform Actifisys qualify for awesome-selfhosted? #4641

Closed
opened 2025-11-26 21:06:29 -06:00 by GiteaMirror · 3 comments
Owner

Originally created by @danielbrendel on GitHub (Aug 5, 2023).

https://github.com/danielbrendel/dnyActifisys

It is a self-hosted community event platform and social network. It is similar to meetup and the old german Spontacts version. Users and organizations can create upcoming activities where users can participate and discuss them, upload photos, etc. There is also a forum, gallery and basic market place implemented, among many other things. The software can be configured to match any theme, e.g. a gaming (LFG) platform, music platform, spare time platform, etc.

I am the developer and maintainer of the project and I am also using it live for my medieval community platform: https://www.mittelalter-events.com/

Currently there are no detailed install instructions and no release yet, but I just wanted to generally ask if that software qualifies for that list here, because it is not really popular (only a few stars and 1 fork). Also the GUI might not really be that beautiful and I didn't find anything in the contribution guidelines describing requirements of popularity, design, code quality etc.

Originally created by @danielbrendel on GitHub (Aug 5, 2023). https://github.com/danielbrendel/dnyActifisys It is a self-hosted community event platform and social network. It is similar to meetup and the old german Spontacts version. Users and organizations can create upcoming activities where users can participate and discuss them, upload photos, etc. There is also a forum, gallery and basic market place implemented, among many other things. The software can be configured to match any theme, e.g. a gaming (LFG) platform, music platform, spare time platform, etc. I am the developer and maintainer of the project and I am also using it live for my medieval community platform: https://www.mittelalter-events.com/ Currently there are no detailed install instructions and no release yet, but I just wanted to generally ask if that software qualifies for that list here, because it is not really popular (only a few stars and 1 fork). Also the GUI might not really be that beautiful and I didn't find anything in the contribution guidelines describing requirements of popularity, design, code quality etc.
GiteaMirror added the reviewers wantedaddition labels 2025-11-26 21:06:29 -06:00
Author
Owner

@kokomo123 commented on GitHub (Aug 7, 2023):

Hi there, thanks for your input before creating a PR. There's no popularity, design, code quality guidelines. We just ask to be included in the list, it's mature, it has working, detailed installation instructions, and has a license along with following the format of the list entries as explained in the PR template.

@kokomo123 commented on GitHub (Aug 7, 2023): Hi there, thanks for your input before creating a PR. There's no popularity, design, code quality guidelines. We just ask to be included in the list, it's mature, it has working, detailed installation instructions, and has a license along with following the format of the list entries as explained in the PR template.
Author
Owner

@danielbrendel commented on GitHub (Aug 7, 2023):

Thank you. I'll create a PR when I updated the mentioned things.

@danielbrendel commented on GitHub (Aug 7, 2023): Thank you. I'll create a PR when I updated the mentioned things.
Author
Owner

@EmailScraper commented on GitHub (Oct 20, 2025):

Good

@EmailScraper commented on GitHub (Oct 20, 2025): Good
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/awesome-selfhosted#4641