github-starred/awesome-obsidian
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/kmaasrud/awesome-obsidian.git synced 2026-07-16 10:22:13 -05:00
Code Issues 683 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #38] "Handy tools" contains different types of things #1138

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-06-10 04:56:52 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 2 comments
GiteaMirror commented 2026-06-10 04:56:52 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @konhi on GitHub (Aug 24, 2021).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/kmaasrud/awesome-obsidian/issues/38

Handy tools section contains different type of tools:

  • Plugins, e.g. Obsidian Day Planner
  • External Tools, e.g. Oboe
  • Templates, e.g. Obsidian Starter Templates

I think it should be split for clarity! 😀

I think another issue is that there is a credits section, but these are open-source projects with multiple contributors. Should credits then stay in the table? Repository is linked anyway, so user can see contributors anyway. Let me know what do you think! 😊

Originally created by @konhi on GitHub (Aug 24, 2021). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/kmaasrud/awesome-obsidian/issues/38 **Handy tools** section contains different type of tools: - **Plugins**, e.g. Obsidian Day Planner - **External Tools**, e.g. Oboe - **Templates**, e.g. Obsidian Starter Templates I think it should be split for clarity! 😀 --- I think another issue is that there is a credits section, but these are open-source projects with multiple contributors. Should credits then stay in the table? Repository is linked anyway, so user can see contributors anyway. Let me know what do you think! 😊
GiteaMirror commented 2026-06-10 04:56:54 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@kmaasrud commented on GitHub (Aug 24, 2021):

I agree with the splitting you have done in #39. I made that section before the Obsidian API was released and we did not have many plugins/other tools, so it made sense. But now this is a much better solution!

I like the "community" feeling we get when giving credits, so I think we should keep them for now. Or at least as long as the contributor lists don't get too long - in which case I might consider removing them.

<!-- gh-comment-id:904899207 --> @kmaasrud commented on GitHub (Aug 24, 2021): I agree with the splitting you have done in #39. I made that section before the Obsidian API was released and we did not have many plugins/other tools, so it made sense. But now this is a much better solution! I like the "community" feeling we get when giving credits, so I think we should keep them for now. Or at least as long as the contributor lists don't get too long - in which case I might consider removing them.
GiteaMirror commented 2026-06-10 04:56:55 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@konhi commented on GitHub (Aug 24, 2021):

Thanks for feedback, an interesting perspective! 😊
Nothing left to change in the PR, it's ready to merge.

<!-- gh-comment-id:904919124 --> @konhi commented on GitHub (Aug 24, 2021): Thanks for feedback, an interesting perspective! 😊 Nothing left to change in the PR, it's ready to merge.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
bug
help wanted
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/awesome-obsidian#1138
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?