[PR #75] [MERGED] Add llm-wiki to Workflows and Innovations #923

New Issue

GiteaMirror · 2026-07-11T19:34:14-05:00

GiteaMirror commented

2026-07-11 19:34:14 -05:00

📋 Pull Request Information

Original PR: https://github.com/logseq/awesome-logseq/pull/75
Author: @MehmetGoekce
Created: 4/26/2026
Status: ✅ Merged
Merged: 4/27/2026
Merged by: @logseq-cldwalker

Base: master ← Head: add-llm-wiki

📝 Commits (1)

177f563 Add llm-wiki to Workflows and Innovations

📊 Changes

1 file changed (+1 additions, -0 deletions)

View changed files

📝 README.md (+1 -0)

📄 Description

Summary

Adds llm-wiki to the Workflows and Innovations section. It is a Logseq-based implementation of Andrej Karpathy's LLM Wiki gist — Claude Code maintains the graph for you (ingest sources, query, lint, status), with schema-driven consistency and a two-layer cache architecture.

Why it fits

The "Workflows and Innovations" section already lists tools that automate parts of Logseq maintenance (Lupin, logseq-doctor, Logseq Advanced Query Builder, etc.). llm-wiki extends this idea further: it lets an LLM maintain the entire knowledge graph — extracting facts from new sources, updating cross-references, enforcing the schema, and running health checks (orphans, stale pages, broken refs, credential leaks).

The Logseq outliner format is what makes the LLM use case work — every block is independently addressable, so an ingest can append new content without disrupting existing structure. This is genuinely Logseq-native; the same pattern is much harder in flat-markdown systems.

Project details

License: MIT
Status: Active (~65★, last commit ~1 week ago)
Tech stack: Claude Code + Logseq (Obsidian also supported, but Logseq is the recommended/primary target)
Standalone: No Logseq plugin, no Logseq HTTP API dependency — operates directly on the markdown files

Test plan

Entry follows the section's existing one-line format ("by Author - Description")
Repo URL resolves and is publicly accessible
Description honestly reflects the project (no hype)
Section choice (Workflows and Innovations) matches existing similar entries

_{🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.}

## 📋 Pull Request Information **Original PR:** https://github.com/logseq/awesome-logseq/pull/75 **Author:** [@MehmetGoekce](https://github.com/MehmetGoekce) **Created:** 4/26/2026 **Status:** ✅ Merged **Merged:** 4/27/2026 **Merged by:** [@logseq-cldwalker](https://github.com/logseq-cldwalker) **Base:** `master` ← **Head:** `add-llm-wiki` --- ### 📝 Commits (1) - [`177f563`](https://github.com/logseq/awesome-logseq/commit/177f5633c7bfa057df15f09d5e70921838a0a308) Add llm-wiki to Workflows and Innovations ### 📊 Changes **1 file changed** (+1 additions, -0 deletions) <details> <summary>View changed files</summary> 📝 `README.md` (+1 -0) </details> ### 📄 Description ## Summary Adds [llm-wiki](https://github.com/MehmetGoekce/llm-wiki) to the **Workflows and Innovations** section. It is a Logseq-based implementation of [Andrej Karpathy's LLM Wiki gist](https://gist.github.com/karpathy/442a6bf555914893e9891c11519de94f) — Claude Code maintains the graph for you (ingest sources, query, lint, status), with schema-driven consistency and a two-layer cache architecture. ## Why it fits The "Workflows and Innovations" section already lists tools that automate parts of Logseq maintenance (Lupin, logseq-doctor, Logseq Advanced Query Builder, etc.). llm-wiki extends this idea further: it lets an LLM **maintain the entire knowledge graph** — extracting facts from new sources, updating cross-references, enforcing the schema, and running health checks (orphans, stale pages, broken refs, credential leaks). The Logseq outliner format is what makes the LLM use case work — every block is independently addressable, so an ingest can append new content without disrupting existing structure. This is genuinely Logseq-native; the same pattern is much harder in flat-markdown systems. ## Project details - **License:** MIT - **Status:** Active (~65★, last commit ~1 week ago) - **Tech stack:** Claude Code + Logseq (Obsidian also supported, but Logseq is the recommended/primary target) - **Standalone:** No Logseq plugin, no Logseq HTTP API dependency — operates directly on the markdown files ## Test plan - [x] Entry follows the section's existing one-line format ("by Author - Description") - [x] Repo URL resolves and is publicly accessible - [x] Description honestly reflects the project (no hype) - [x] Section choice (Workflows and Innovations) matches existing similar entries --- <sub>🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.</sub>

GiteaMirror added the pull-request label 2026-07-11 19:34:14 -05:00

GiteaMirror closed this issue

2026-07-11 19:34:15 -05:00

Sign in to join this conversation.

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/awesome-logseq#923