github-starred/awesome-cryptography
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/sobolevn/awesome-cryptography.git synced 2026-03-14 02:53:43 -05:00
Code Issues 29 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

shields/badges? #11

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-11-06 09:05:41 -06:00 by GiteaMirror · 1 comment
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-06 09:05:41 -06:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @robjtede on GitHub (Apr 22, 2018).

Looking at the Rust libraries some of them are pretty inactive. Wondering if using shields is a good idea for this. Eg. the Rust rust-openssl and suruga library entries could look like this.

or a more radical change being converting the list to a table layout which could include more shields if needed like number of open issues?

Repo Description Info
rust-openssl OpenSSL bindings for Rust. GitHub last commit
suruga TLS 1.2 implementation in Rust. GitHub last commit

I feel like the freshness of a crypto repo is a pretty important factor for choosing, personally.

Originally created by @robjtede on GitHub (Apr 22, 2018). Looking at the Rust libraries some of them are pretty inactive. Wondering if using shields is a good idea for this. Eg. the Rust `rust-openssl` and `suruga` library entries could look like this. - [rust-openssl](https://github.com/sfackler/rust-openssl) - OpenSSL bindings for Rust. ![GitHub last commit](https://img.shields.io/github/last-commit/sfackler/rust-openssl.svg) - [suruga](https://github.com/klutzy/suruga) - TLS 1.2 implementation in Rust. ![GitHub last commit](https://img.shields.io/github/last-commit/klutzy/suruga.svg) or a more radical change being converting the list to a table layout which could include more shields if needed like number of open issues? | Repo | Description | Info | |--|--|--| | [rust-openssl](https://github.com/sfackler/rust-openssl) | OpenSSL bindings for Rust. | ![GitHub last commit](https://img.shields.io/github/last-commit/sfackler/rust-openssl.svg) | [suruga](https://github.com/klutzy/suruga) | TLS 1.2 implementation in Rust. | ![GitHub last commit](https://img.shields.io/github/last-commit/klutzy/suruga.svg) | I feel like the freshness of a crypto repo is a pretty important factor for choosing, personally.
GiteaMirror commented 2025-11-06 09:05:43 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@sobolevn commented on GitHub (Apr 22, 2018):

I like badges!

But sometimes there can be too many badges. Maybe just removing some outdated packages?

@sobolevn commented on GitHub (Apr 22, 2018): I like badges! But sometimes there can be too many badges. Maybe just removing some outdated packages?
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
bug
content-request
enhancement
foreign-invalid-link
help wanted
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
section-request
waits-feedback
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
GiteaMirror ninjasurge
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/awesome-cryptography#11
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?