[GH-ISSUE #51] does tools written in other languages but for bash count? #3693

Closed
opened 2026-07-10 17:33:42 -05:00 by GiteaMirror · 4 comments
Owner

Originally created by @shinenelson on GitHub (May 5, 2020).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/awesome-lists/awesome-bash/issues/51

I've worked with bashly and it seemed like a good tool that could be on this list under the Shell Script Development section. I think it works similar to bashing ( from the description of the project ), but I haven't used bashing, so I cannot confirm it.

However, the catch is that the tool itself is a ruby gem which means one needs to install a ruby environment and then install the gem to use it.

I know it is kind of counter intuitive, but I'd still like to at least give it a shot and ask ( no harm in asking right? ) whether it is acceptable on this list. I know the shell script development list is already long enough that it does not need another "non-native" member to alienate.

Originally created by @shinenelson on GitHub (May 5, 2020). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/awesome-lists/awesome-bash/issues/51 I've worked with [`bashly`](https://github.com/DannyBen/bashly) and it seemed like a good tool that could be on this list under the [Shell Script Development](https://github.com/awesome-lists/awesome-bash#shell-script-development) section. I think it works similar to [`bashing`](https://github.com/xsc/bashing) ( from the description of the project ), but I haven't used `bashing`, so I cannot confirm it. However, the catch is that the tool itself is a ruby gem which means one needs to install a ruby environment and then install the gem to use it. I know it is kind of counter intuitive, but I'd still like to at least give it a shot and ask ( no harm in asking right? ) whether it is acceptable on this list. I know the shell script development list is already long enough that it does not need another "non-native" member to alienate.
Author
Owner

@aloisdg commented on GitHub (Nov 29, 2021):

I don't know for other awesome lists, but as far as I concerned I would say that bashly does apply.

<!-- gh-comment-id:981808078 --> @aloisdg commented on GitHub (Nov 29, 2021): I don't know for other awesome lists, but as far as I concerned I would say that bashly does apply.
Author
Owner

@aloisdg commented on GitHub (Nov 29, 2021):

Bashly merged #66

<!-- gh-comment-id:981808631 --> @aloisdg commented on GitHub (Nov 29, 2021): Bashly merged #66
Author
Owner

@ajeetdsouza commented on GitHub (Nov 30, 2021):

@aloisdg does https://github.com/awesome-lists/awesome-bash/pull/53 apply here too?

<!-- gh-comment-id:982311824 --> @ajeetdsouza commented on GitHub (Nov 30, 2021): @aloisdg does https://github.com/awesome-lists/awesome-bash/pull/53 apply here too?
Author
Owner

@aloisdg commented on GitHub (Nov 30, 2021):

I will answer on #53

<!-- gh-comment-id:982506479 --> @aloisdg commented on GitHub (Nov 30, 2021): I will answer on #53
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/awesome-bash#3693